Strengthening links between health action zone evaluation and primary care research

Primary Health Care Research and Development

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 39-47

  Coppel, Dara ^a   Dyas, Jane ^b  

^a Nottingham City Primary Care Trust   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

evaluation; partnerships; primary care research

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042724137     PISSN: 14634236     EISSN: 14771128     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/1463423603pc121oa     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Amery, J. 2000: Interprofessional working in Health Action Zones: how can this be fostered and sustained? Journal of Interprofessional Care Vol. 14, No 1.
2. Billingham, K. and Drinkwater, C. 2001: Working together, Changing Together? Health Action Zones and Primary Care. HAZ National Support Network, (Unpublished).
3. Connell, J. and Klem, A. 1999: You Can Get There From Here: Using a Theories of Change Approach to Plan Urban Education Reforms. Institute for Research and Reform in Education, (Unpublished).
4. Connell, J.P. and Kubisch, A.C. 1996: Applying a Theories of Change Approach to the Evaluation of comprehensive Community Initiatives. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
5. Connell, J.P. and Kubisch, A.C. 1998: Applying a Theory of Change Approach to the Evaluation of Comprehensive Community Initiatives: Progress, Prospects, and Problems. In Fulbright-Anderson, K., Kubisch, A.C. and Connell J.P editors, New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiative. Volume 2 Theory, Measurement and Analysis, Washington DC: The Aspen Institute.
6. Connell, J.P., Kubisch, A.C., Schorr, L.B. and Weiss, C.H. editors 1995: New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives: Concepts, methods and contexts. Washington DC: The Aspen Institute.
7. Coppel, D. 1999: An Evaluation Resource Pack for Nottingham HAZ Projects. Unpublished.
8. Department of Health 2000: Research and Development for a First Class Service R&D - funding in the New NHS. London: Department of Health.
9. Department of Health 2001: Shifting the Balance of Power within the NHS Securing Delivery. London: Department of Health.
10. Jacobs, B. 2001: Evaluating a Complex Partnership: North Staffordshire Health Action Zone. Staffordshire University.
11. Judge, K., Bauld, C., Adams, C., Findlater, J., Killoran, A., Barnes, M. and Benzeval, M. 1999: Health Action Zones: Learning to make a difference. University of Kent at Canterbury: PSSRU.
12. Judge, K. 2000: Testing Evaluation to the Limits: the case of English Health Action Zones. Journal of Health Services Research Policy 5, pp 3–5.
13. Local Government Association 2000: Supporting the Action Zones - early messages, future plans. London: LGA Publications.
14. Maddock, S. 2000: Managing the Development of Partnerships in Health Action Zones. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 13, 65–73.
15. Milligan, S., Coulton, C., York P. and Register, R. 1999: Implementing a Theory of Change Evaluation in the Cleveland Community-Building Initiative: A Case Study. In: Connell, J. P., Kubisch, A.C., Schorr, L.B., and Weiss C.H. editors, New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives: Concepts, methods and contexts. Washington DC: The Aspen Institute.
16. National Cancer Institute 1995: Theory at a Glance: A Guide for Health Promotion Practice (NIH Publication No. 97–3896). Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute.
17. National Health Service Executive (EL(97)65). 1997: Health Action Zones - Invitation to Bid. NHSE Department of Health.
18. Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. 1997: Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage Publications.
19. Secretary of State for Health 1997: The New NHS, Modern, Dependable. London: Stationary Office.
20. Secretary of State for Health 1998: Our Healthier Nation. London: Stationary Office.
21. Secretary of State for Health 1999: Saving Lives: Our Healthier Nation. London: Stationary Office.
22. Secretary of State for Health 2000: The NHS Plan. Norwich: HMSO.
23. Townsend, P., Davidson, N. and Whitehead, M. 1988: Inequalities in health: the Black Report and the Health Divide. 2nd edition. London: Penguin.
24. Weiss, C.H 1995: Nothing as practical as good theory: exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiat- ives for children and families, In: Connell, J.P., Kubisch, A. C., Schorr, L.B. and Weiss, C.H. editors, New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives: Concepts, methods and contexts. Washington DC: The Aspen Institute.
25. Weiss, C.H. 1998: Evaluation. 2nd Edition. London: Prentice Hall.
26. Whitehead, M. and Diderichsen, F. 1997: International evidence on social inequalities in health. In: Dreyer F., Whitehead M. editors, Health inequalities: decennial supplement: DS Series no. 15. London: The Stationery Office.
27. Wilkinson, R.G. 1997: Health Inequalities: relative or absolute material standards? British Medical Journal 314, 591–595.
28. World Health Organisation 1978: The Alma Ata Declaration. Geneva: World Health Organisation.