Bell states of atoms with ultralong lifetimes and their tomographic state analysis

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 92, Issue 22, 2004, Pages

  Roos, C F ^a   Lancaster, G P T ^a   Riebe, M ^a   Haffner H ^a   Hansel W ^a   Guide, S ^a   Becher, C ^a   Eschner, J ^a   Schmidt Kaler, F ^a   Blatt, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAMERAS; CHARGE COUPLED DEVICES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FLUORESCENCE; LASER BEAMS; LASER PULSES; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; RESONANCE; SET THEORY;

EIGENVECTOR; LASER FREQUENCY; LIGHT FIELDS; QUANTUM STATE;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 3042718942     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.220402     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University, Cambridge, 2000).
2. F. Schmidt-Kaler et al., Nature (London) 422, 408 (2003); D. Leibfried et al., ibid 422, 412 (2003).
3. F. Schmidt-Kaler et al., Nature (London) 422, 408 (2003); D. Leibfried et al., ibid 422, 412 (2003).
4. K. Vogel and H. Risken, Phys. Rev. A 40, 2847 (1989).
5. I. L. Chuang, N. Gershenfeld, M. G. Kubinec, and D. Leung, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 454, 447 (1998).
6. A. G. White, D.F.V. James, P.H. Eberhard, and P.G. Kwiat, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3103 (1999).
7. A. G. White, D. F.V. James, W. J. Munro, and P. G. Kwiat, Phys. Rev. A 65, 012301 (2001).
8. E. Hagley, X. Maître, G. Nogues, C. Wunderlich, M. Brune, J. M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1 (1997).
9. Q. A. Turchette, C. S. Wood, B. E. King, C. J. Myatt, D. Leibfried, W. M. Itano, C. Monroe, and D. J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3631 (1998).
10. Ch. Roos et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4713 (1999).
11. P. A. Barton, C. J. S. Donald, D. M. Lucas, D. A. Stevens, A. M. Steane, and D. N. Stacey, Phys. Rev. A 62, 032503 (2000).
12. F. Schmidt-Kaler et al., Appl. Phys. B 77, 789 (2003).
13. H. Häffner et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 143602 (2003).
14. z corresponding to the eigenvalues +1 and -1, respectively.
15. U. Fano, Rev. Mod Phys. 29, 74 (1957).
16. Z. Hradil, Phys. Rev. A 55, R1561 (1997).
17. K. Banaszek, G. M. D'Ariano, M.G.A. Paris, and M. F. Sacchi, Phys. Rev. A 61, 010304 (1999).
18. D. F.V. James, P. G. Kwiat, W. J. Munro, and A. G. White, Phys. Rev. A 64, 052312 (2001).
19. K. Usami, Y. Nambu, Y. Tsuda, K. Matsumoto, and K. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. A 68, 022314 (2003).
20. A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413 (1996).
21. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A 223, 1 (1996).
22. B. Efron and R. Tibshirani, Stat Sci. 1, 54 (1986)
23. W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998).
24. D. Kielpinski, V. Meyer, M. A. Rowe, C. A. Sackett, W. M. Itano, C. Monroe, and D. J. Wineland, Science 291, 1013 (2001).
25. The value of the field gradient was confirmed in an independent measurement.
26. J. J. Bollinger, W. M. Itano, D. J. Wineland, and D. J. Heinzen, Phys. Rev. A 54, R4649 (1996).