Comparison of repeatability of non-invasive and invasive urodynamics

Neurourology and Urodynamics

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 317-321

  Van Mastrigt, R ^a   Huang Foen Chung, J W N C ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Difference plot; Non invasive; Repeatability; Reproducibility; Urodynamics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BLADDER FUNCTION; BLADDER PRESSURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; REPRODUCIBILITY; URODYNAMICS;

ADULT; AGED; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, UROLOGICAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 3042714566     PISSN: 07332467     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nau.20043     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Abrams P. 1999. Bladder outlet obstruction index, bladder contractility index, and bladder voiding efficiency: Three simple indices to define bladder voiding function. BJU Int 84:14-5.
2. Bland JM, Altman DG. 1986. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307-10.
3. Griffiths DJ, Constantinou CE, Mastrigt R van. 1986. Urinary bladder function and its control in healthy females. Am J Physiol 251-2:R225-30.
4. Griffiths D, Mastrigt R van, Bosch R. 1989. Quantification of urethral resistance and bladder function during voiding, with special reference to the effects of prostate size reduction on urethral obstruction due to BPH. Neurourol Urodyn 8-1:17-27.
5. Hansen F, Olsen L, Atan A, et al. 1997. Pressure-flow studies: An evaluation of within-Testing reproducibility-Validity of the measured parameters. Neurourol Urodyn 16-6:521-32.
6. Huang Foen Chung JWNC, Bohnen AM, Pel JJM, et al. 2002. Application of non-invasive urodynamics to longitudinally study changes in the urinary bladder contractility. Neurourol Urodyn 21-4:351-2.
7. Huang Foen Chung JWNC, Bohnen AM, Pel JJM, et al. 2004. Applicability and reproducibility of the condom catheter method for measuring the isovolumetric bladder pressure. Urology 63:56-60.
8. Mastrigt R van. 2000. Editorial Comment to: Sonke GS, Kortmann BBM, Verbeek ALM, Kiemeney LALM, Debruyne FMJ, Rosette JJMCH de la. Variability of pressure-flow studies in men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Neurourol Urodyn 19-6:649-51.
9. Pel JJM, Mastrigt R van. 1999. Non-invasive measurement of bladder pressure using an external catheter. Neurourol Urodyn 18:455-69. (Authors' reply). Neurourol Urodyn 18:472-5.
10. Pel JJM, Mastrigt R van. 1999. Non-invasive measurement of bladder pressure using an external catheter. Neurourol Urodyn 18:455-69. (Authors' reply). Neurourol Urodyn 18:472-5.
11. Pel JJM, Mastrigt R van. 2001. The variable outflow resistance catheter: A new method to measure bladder pressure noninvasively. J Urol 165:647-52.
12. Pel JJM, Mastrigt R van. 2003. A flow rate cut-off value as a criterion for the accurate non-invasive measurement of bladder pressure using a condom-type catheter. Urol Res 31:177-82.
13. Pel JJM, Bosch JLHR, Lycklama à Nijeholt AAB, et al. 2002. Development of a non-invasive strategy to classify bladder outlet obstruction in male patients with LUTS. Neurourol Urodyn 21:117-25.
14. Rikken B, Pel JJM, Mastrigt R van. 1999. Repeat noninvasive bladder pressure measurements with an external catheter. J Urol 162:474-9.
15. Sonke GS, Kortmann BBM, Verbeek ALM, et al. 2000. Variability of pressure-flow studies in men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Neurourol Urodyn 19-6:637-56.