Beyond-mean-field results for atomic Bose-Einstein condensates at interaction strengths near Feshbach resonances: A many-body dimensional perturbation-theory calculation

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 69, Issue 5 B, 2004, Pages

  McKinney, B A ^a   Dunn, M ^a   Watson, D K ^a  

^a University of Oklahoma   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; ATOMIC PHYSICS; CORRELATION METHODS; EXTRAPOLATION; HARMONIC ANALYSIS; HYDRODYNAMICS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; OPTIMIZATION; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; PROBABILITY; PROBLEM SOLVING;

BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATE (BEC); ENERGY CORRECTION; ENERGY EXPANSION; WAVE SCATTERING;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 3042713968     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.053611     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. F. Dalfovo, S. Giorgini, L. P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stingari, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 463 (1999).
2. B. D. Esry and C. H. Greene, Phys. Rev. A 60, 1451 (1999).
3. S. L. Cornish, N. R. Claussen, J. L. Roberts, E. A. Cornell, and C. Wieman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1795 (2000).
4. E. Braaten and A. Nieto, Phys. Rev. B 56, 14745 (1997).
5. E. Timmermans, P. Tommasini, and K. Huang, Phys. Rev. A 55, 3645 (1997).
6. G. S. Nunes, J. Phys. B 32, 4293 (1999).
7. S. Giorgini, J. Boronat, and J. Casulleras, Phys. Rev. A 60, 5129 (1999).
8. D. Blume and C. H. Greene, Phys. Rev. A 63, 063061 (2001).
9. A. Fabrocini and A. Polls, Phys. Rev. A 60, 2319 (1999).
10. A. Fabrocini and A. Polls, Phys. Rev. A 64, 063610 (1999).
11. N. N. Bogoliubov, J. Phys. (Moscow) 11, 23 (1947).
12. T. D. Lee, K. Huang, and C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. 106, 1135 (1957).
13. T. T. Wu, Phys. Rev. 115, 1390 (1959).
14. N. Hugenholtz and D. Pines, Phys. Rev. 116, 489 (1959).
15. E. H. Lieb and J. Yngvason, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2504 (1998).
16. J. L. DuBois and H. R. Glyde, Phys. Rev. A 63, 023602 (2001).
17. B. A. McKinney, M. Dunn, D. K. Watson, and J. G. Loeser, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 310, 56 (2004).
18. B. D. Esry, Phys. Rev. A 55, 1147 (1997).
19. M. Dunn, T. Germann, D. Goodson, C. Traynor, J. Morgan III, D. Watson, and D. Herschbach, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 5987 (1994).
20. E. B. Wilson, J. C. Decius, and P. C. Cross, Molecular Vibrations: The Theory of Infrared and Roman Vibrational Spectra (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1955).
21. J. G. Loeser, J. Chem. Phys. 86, 5635 (1987).
22. J. R. Walkup, M. Dunn, and D. K. Watson, Phys. Rev. A 63, 025405 (2001).
23. P. R. Bevington and D. K. Robinson, Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1992).
24. The uncertainties in the DMC energies are a combination of statistical and systematic uncertainties. The systematic uncertainties are thought to be small [D. Blume (private communication)].
25. Equation (62) assumes one can achive an exact fit Q= 1.0 with s=6 parameters, which is not quite possible with our fitting function. However, the fit with s=6 parameters is close enough to effectively give Q= 1.0
26. W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992).
27. In practice, there are three-parameter potential fits with Q values slightly over 0.5. The four-parameter extrapolations, however, are clearly superior to the three-parameter extrapolations. Since the errors on the DMC energies are the result of a conservative appraisal [D. Blume (private communication)], we take the four-parameter potential fits to be optimal and attribute the Q values being slightly over 0.5 for the three-parameter fits to the cautious error analysis.
28. ho for only a single atom.
29. P. Nozières and D. Pines, The Theory of Quantum Liquids (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1990), Vol. II.
30. S. Stringari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2360 (1996).
31. L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4541 (1998).