Three-dimensional reconstructed images using multidetector computed tomography in evaluation of the biliary tract: An illustrative review

Abdominal Imaging

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 472-478

  Kim, H C ^a   Park, S H ^a   Park, S I ^a   Shin, H C ^a   Park, S J ^a   Kim, H H ^a   Kim, Y T ^a   Bae, W K ^a   Kim, I Y ^a  

^a Soonchunhyang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Bile duct, computed tomography; Computed tomography, three dimensional; Multidetector

Indexed keywords

BILE DUCT CARCINOMA; BILE DUCT STONE; BILIARY TRACT DISEASE; BILIARY TRACT MALFORMATION; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HEPATOBILIARY SYSTEM; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

BILIARY TRACT; BILIARY TRACT DISEASES; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 3042704097     PISSN: 09428925     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Goldberg HI (1994) Helical cholangiography: complementary or substitute study for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 192:615-616
2. Wong K, Paulson EK, Nelson RC (2001) Breath-hold three dimensional CT of the liver with multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology 219:75-79
3. Hu H, He HD, Foley WD, et al. (2000) Four multidetector-row helical CT: image quality and volume coverage speed. Radiology 215:55-62
4. Baron RL, Rohrmann CA Jr., Lee SP, et al. (1988) CT evaluation of gallstones in vitro: correlation with chemical analysis. AJR 151:1123-1128
5. Baron RL (1991) Gallstone characterization: the role of imaging. Semin Roentgenol 26:216-225
6. Baron RL, Tublin ME, Peterson MS (2002) Imaging of the spectrum of biliary tract disease. Radiol Clin North Am 40:1325-1354
7. Neitlich JD, Topazian M, Smith RC, et al. (1997) Detection of choledocholithiasis: comparison of unenhanced helical CT and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 203:753-757
8. Breen DJ, Nicholson AA (2000) The clinical utility of spiral CT cholangiography. Clin Radiol 55:733-739
9. Zandrino F, Benzi L, Ferretti ML, et al. (2002) Multislice CT cholangiography without biliary contrast agent: technique and initial clinical results in the assessment of patients with biliary obstruction. Eur Radiol 12:1155-1161
10. Park SJ, Han JK, Kim TK, et al. (2001) Three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography with minimum intensity projection in patients with suspected obstructive biliary disease: comparison with percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. Abdom Imaging 26:281-286
11. Nino-Murcia M, Tamm EP, Charnsangavej C, et al. (2003) Multidetector-row helical CT and advanced postprocessing techniques for the evaluation of pancreatic neoplasms. Abdom Imaging 28:366-377
12. Gore RM, Fulcher AS, Taylor AJ (2000) Anomalies and anatomic variants of the gallbladder and biliary tract. In: Gore RM, Levine MS (eds) Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology, 2nd ed. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1305-1320
13. Babbitt DP, et al. (1969) Congenital choledochal cyst: new etiologic concept based on anomalous relationships of common bile duct and pancreatic bulb. Ann Radiol 12:231-240
14. Irie H, Honda H, Jimi M, et al. (1998) Value of MR cholangiopancreatography in evaluating choledochal cysts. AJR 17:1381-1385