Semiclassical instability of the Cauchy horizon in self-similar collapse

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 69, Issue 10, 2004, Pages

  Miyamoto, Umpei ^a   Harada, Tomohiro ^b  

^a WASEDA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042699897     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.104005     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. R. Penrose, Riv. Nuovo Cimento 1, 252 (1969)
2. R. Penrosereprinted in Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 34, 1141 (2002);in General Relativity, An Einstein Century Survey, edited by S.W. Hawking and W. Israel (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1979), p. 581.
3. S.W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975).
4. L.H. Ford and L. Parker, Phys. Rev. D 17, 1485 (1978).
5. W.A. Hiscock, L.G. Williams, and D.M. Eardley, Phys. Rev. D 26, 751 (1982).
6. S. Barve, T.P. Singh, C. Vaz, and L. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B532, 361 (1998)
7. S. BarveT.P. SinghC. VazL. WittenPhys. Rev. D 58, 104018 (1998).
8. C. Vaz and L. Witten, Phys. Lett. B 442, 90 (1998).
9. T. Harada, H. Iguchi, and K. Nakao, Phys. Rev. D 61, 101502 (2000)
10. Phys. Rev. DT. HaradaH. IguchiK. Nakao62, 084037 (2000).
11. T.P. Singh and C. Vaz, Phys. Lett. B 481, 74 (2000).
12. T. Harada, H. Iguchi, and K. Nakao, Prog. Theor. Phys. 107, 449 (2002).
13. P.S. Joshi, N. Dadhich, and R. Maartens, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 15, 991 (2000).
14. B. Waugh and K. Lake, Phys. Rev. D 40, 2137 (1989).
15. K. Lake and T. Zannias, Phys. Rev. D 41, 3866 (1990).
16. A. Ori and T. Piran, Phys. Rev. D 42, 1068 (1990).
17. A. Ori and T. Piran, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2137 (1987)
18. A. OriT. PiranGen. Relativ. Gravit. 20, 7 (1988).
19. T. Harada and H. Maeda, Phys. Rev. D 63, 084022 (2001).
20. B.J. Carr and A.A. Coley, Class. Quantum Grav. 16, R31 (1999).
21. B.J. Carr, in Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on General Relativity and Gravitation, Hiroshima, Japan, 1999, edited by Y. Eriguchi et al., p. 425, gr-qc/0003009.
22. C. Gundlach, Phys. Rep. 376, 339 (2003).
23. T. Tanaka and T.P. Singh, Phys. Rev. D 63, 124021 (2001).
24. B.C. Nolan and T. Waters, Phys. Rev. D 66, 104012 (2002).
25. One can prove (Formula presented) with the dominant energy condition on collapsing matter, and the equality is excluded by a physically reasonable requirement on the collapsing matter at the CH 20.
26. The time (Formula presented) can be regarded as the Planck time (Formula presented) at least this is the case for the self-similar dust model.
27. T. Harada, H. Iguchi, K. Nakao, T. Tanaka, T.P. Singh, and C. Vaz, Phys. Rev. D 64, 041501 (2001).
28. When the CH and event horizon exactly coincide, the radiation is reduced to the Hawking radiation 34. This fact cannot be derived with the method making use of the local map since in this case (Formula presented) in Eq. (3.1). This is not surprising, since an event horizon, which plays a central role in the Hawking radiation, is not a local object but a global one.
29. P.C. Vaidya, Curr. Sci. 13, 183 (1943)
30. P.C. VaidyaPhys. Rev. 47, 10 (1951)
31. P.C. VaidyaProc. Indian Acad. Sci., Sect. A 33, 264 (1951).
32. M.D. Roberts, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 21, 907 (1989).
33. G. Lemaître, Ann. Soc. Sci. Bruxelles, Ser. 1 A 53, 51 (1933)
34. R.C. Tolman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 20, 169 (1934)
35. H. Bondi, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 107, 410 (1947).
36. P.S. Joshi and I.H. Dwivedi, Phys. Rev. D 47, 5357 (1993).
37. U. Miyamoto and T. Harada (in preparation).