Rough set spatial data modeling for data mining

International Journal of Intelligent Systems

Volumn 19, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 567-584

  Beaubouef, Theresa ^a   Ladner, Roy ^b   Petry, Frederick ^b  

^a SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATABASE LEARNING; EGG-YOLK METHODS; TOPOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS; UNCERTAINTY MANAGEMENT;

DATABASE SYSTEMS; FUZZY SETS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; ROUGH SET THEORY; UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS;

DATA MINING;

EID: 3042693665     PISSN: 08848173     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/int.20019     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Laurini R, Thompson D. Fundamentals of spatial information systems. London: Academic Press; 1992.
2. Koperski K, Han J. Discovery of spatial association rules in geographic information databases. In: Proc 4th Int Symposium On Large Spatial Databases. Portland, MN; 1995. pp 47-66.
3. Lu W, Han J, Ooi B. Discovery of general knowledge in large spatial databases. In: Proc Far East Workshop on Geographic Information Systems. Singapore; 1993. pp 275-289.
4. Cobb M, Ladner R, Petry F. Data mining of fuzzy association rules for spatial data. Trans Geogr Inf Syst 2003;7(1): 123-138.
5. Beaubouef T, Petry F, Buckles B. Extension of the relational database and its algebra with rough set techniques. Computat Intell 1995;11(2):233-245.
6. Beaubouef T, Petry F. Rough querying of crisp data in relational databases. In: 3rd Int Workshop on Rough Sets and Soft Computing (RSSC'94). San Jose, CA; 1994. pp 368-375.
7. Beaubouef T, Petry F, Breckenridge J. Rough set based uncertainty management for spatial databases and geographical information systems. In: Suzuki Y, editor. Soft computing in industrial applications. London: Springer-Verlag; 2000. pp 471-479.
8. Pawlak Z. Rough sets. Int J Man Mach Stud 1984;21:127-134.
9. Randell D, Cui Z, Cohn A. A spatial logic based on regions and connection. In: Proc 3rd Int Conf On Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. San Mateo, CA; 1992. pp 165-176.
10. Cohn A., Gotts N. The "egg-yolk" representation of regions with indeterminate boundaries. In: Burrough P, Frank A, editors. Geographic objects with indeterminate boundaries, ch 12. GISDATA II. Strasbourg, Cedex, France: European Science Foundation; 1996. pp 68-70.
11. Slowinski R. A generalization of the indiscernibility relation for rough sets analysis of quantitative information. In: 1st Int Workshop on Rough Sets. Poland; 1992.
12. Srinivasan P. The importance of rough approximations for information retrieval. Int J Man Mach Stud 1991;34:657-671.
13. Roy A., Stell J. Spatial relations between indeterminate regions. Int J Approx Reasoning 2001;27(3):205-234.
14. Agrawal R, Imielinski T, S wami A. Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In: Proc 1993 ACM-SIGMOD Int Conf on Management of Data. New York: ACM Press; 1993. pp 207-216.
15. Han J, Kamber M. Data mining: Concepts and techniques. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann; 2001.
16. Han J, Koperski K, Stefanovic N. GeoMiner: A system prototype for spatial data mining. In: Proc 1997 ACM-SIGMOD Int Conf on Management of Data. New York: ACM Press; 1997. pp 553-556.
17. Tobler W. Cellular geography. In: Gale S, Olsson G, editors. Philosophy in Geography. Dortrecht, GD: Riedel; 1979. pp 379-386.