Information-content based sentence extraction for text summarization

International Conference on Information Technology: Coding Computing, ITCC

Volumn 2, Issue , 2004, Pages 214-218

  Mallett, Daniel ^a   Elding, James ^b   Nascimento, Mario A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b Workers' Compensation Board   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOCUMENT UNDERSTANDING CONFERENCES (DUC); NON-REDUNTANT SENTENCES; SENTENCE EXTRACTION; TEXT SUMMARIZATION;

ABSTRACTING; ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DATA COMPRESSION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; INTERPOLATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING; REDUNDANCY; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS; TEXT PROCESSING;

COMPUTER SCIENCE;

EID: 3042692996     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ITCC.2004.1286634     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. C. Aone, M. E. Okurowski, J. Gorlinsky, and B. Larsen. A Scalable Summarization System Using Robust NLP. In Proceedings of the Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization Workshop, pages 66-73, 1997.
2. R. A. Baeza-Yates and B. A. Ribeiro-Neto. Modern Information Retrieval. ACM Press / Addison-Wesley, 1999.
3. R. Barzilay and M. Elhadad. Using lexical chains for text summarization. In Proceedings of the Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization Workshop, pages 10-17, 1997.
4. J. Carbonell and J. Goldstein. The use of MMR, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 335-336, 1998.
5. K. Han, Y. Song, and H. Rim. KU Text Summarization System for DUC 2003. In Document Understanding Conference Draft Papers, pages 118-121, 2003.
6. C.-Y. Lin. Improving Summarization Performance by Sentence Compression - A Pilot Study. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Information Retrieval with Asian Language, pages 1-8, 2003.
7. C.-Y. Lin and E. Hovy. The Potential and Limitations of Automatic Sentence Extraction for Summarization. In Text Summarization: Proceedings of the NLT-NAACL Workshop, pages 73-80, 2003.
8. D. Lin. LaTaT: Language and Text Analysis Tools. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference, pages 222-227, 2001.
9. I. Mani and M. Maybury. Advances in Automatic Text Summarization. MIT Press, 1999.
10. A. Nenkova, B. Schiffman, A. Schlaiker, S. BlairGoldensohn, R. Barzilay, S. Sigelman, V. Hatzivassiloglou, and K. McKeown. Columbia at the Document Understanding Conference 2003. In 2003 Document Understanding Conference Draft Papers, pages 71-78, 2003.
11. C. Nobata and S. Sekine. Results of CRL/NYU System at DUC-2003 and an Experiment on Division of Document Sets. In 2003 Document Understanding Conference Draft Papers, pages 79-85, 2003.
12. M. Porter. An algorithm for suffix stripping. Readings in Information Retrieval, pages 130-137, 1980.
13. D. Radev, H. Jing, and M. Budzikowska. Centroid-based summarization of multiple documents: sentence extraction, utility-based evaluation and user studies. In ANLP/NAACL Workshop on Automatic Summarization, pages 21-29, 2000.
14. D. R. Radev, E. Hovy, and K. McKeown. Introduction to the special issue on summarization. Computational Linguistics, 28(4):399-408, 2002.
15. K. Sparck-Jones and T. Sakai. Generic Summaries for Indexing in IR. In SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 190-198, 2001.
16. S. Teufel and M. Moens. Sentence extraction as a classification task. In ACL/EACL Workshop on Intelligent and Scalable Text Summarization, 1997.
17. I. H. Witten, A. Moffat, and T. C. Bell. Managing Gigabytes: Compressing and Indexing Documents and Images. 1999.