Response to the Norris commentary

Language Learning and Technology

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 106-108

  Kenyon, Dorry M ^a   Malabonga, Valerie ^a,b   Carpenter, Helen ^a  

^a CENTER FOR APPLIED LINGUISTICS   (United States)

^b CAL   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042682014     PISSN: 10943501     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. (1999). ACTFL proficiency guidelines-speaking: Revised 1999. Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: Author.
2. Kenyon, D. M., Farr, B., Mitchell, J., & Armengol, R. (2000). Framework for the 2003 Foreign Language National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: National Assessment Governing Board. (Pre-publication edition) [A complete copy may be downloaded from the publications page of the National Assessment Governing Board's Web site at http://www.nagb.org/pubs/pubs.html.]
3. rd Annual Language Testing Research Colloquium, St. Louis, MO.
4. Kenyon, D. M., & Tschirner, E. (2000). The rating of direct and semi-direct oral proficiency interviews: Comparing performance at lower proficiency levels. Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 85-101.
5. Lowe, P., Jr. (1988). The unassimilated history. In P. Lowe, Jr., & C. W. Stansfield (Eds)., Second language proficiency assessment: Current issues (pp. 11-51). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
6. Mislevy, R. (1995). Test theory and language-learning assessment. Language Testing, 12(3), 341-369.
7. st century. Lawrence, KS: Allen Press.
8. rd edition). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.