Multiple imputation methods for testing treatment differences in survival distributions with missing cause of failure

Biometrika

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 238-244

  Tsiatis, Anastasios A ^a   Davidian, Marie ^a   McNeney, Brad ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Competing risks; Log rank test; Missing at random; Survival analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042681437     PISSN: 00063444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/89.1.238     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. ANDERSEN, J., GOETGHEBEUR, E. & RYAN, L. (1996). Missing cause of death information in the analysis of survival data. Statist. Med. 15, 2191-201.
2. DEWANJI, A. (1992). A note on a test for competing risks with missing failure type. Biometrika 79, 855-7.
3. GOETGHEBEUR, E. & RYAN, L. (1990). A modified log rank test for competing risks with missing failure type. Biometrika 77, 207-11.
4. GOETGHEBEUR, E. & RYAN, L. (1995). Analysis of competing risks survival data when some failure types are missing. Biometrika 82, 821-33.
5. LAGAKOS, S. W. & Louis, T. A. (1988). Use of tumour lethality to interpret tumourigenicity experiments lacking cause-of-death data. Appl. Statist. 37, 169-79.
6. RUBIN, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika 63, 581-92.
7. RUBIN, D. B. (1987). Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: Wiley.
8. RUBIN, D. B. (1996). Multiple imputation after 18+ years. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 91, 473-89.
9. TSIATIS, A. A. (1981). A large sample study of Cox's regression model. Ann. Statist. 9, 93-108.
10. VAN DER VAART, A. W. (1998). Asymptotic Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. WANG, N. & ROBINS, J. M. (1998). Large-sample theory for parametric multiple imputation procedures. Biometrika 85, 935-48.