Time-dependent multiconfiguration theory for electronic dynamics of molecules in an intense laser field

Chemical Physics Letters

Volumn 392, Issue 4-6, 2004, Pages 533-540

  Kato, Tsuyoshi ^a   Kono, Hirohiko ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTRONICS; HYDROGENATION; LASER; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; THEORY; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 3042674959     PISSN: 00092614     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.05.106     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Drescher M., Hentschel M., Kienberger R., Ulberracker M., Yakovlev V., Scrinzi A., Westerwalbesloh Th., Kleineberg U., Heinzmann U., Krausz F. Nature. 419:2002;803
2. Yamanouchi K. Science. 295:2002;1659
3. Tablebpour A., Chiesn C.-Y., Chin S.L. J. Phys. B. 29:1996;L677
4. Guo C., Li M., Nibarger J.P., Gibson G.N. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58:1998;R4271
5. Muth-Böhm J., Becker A., Faisal F.H.M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85:2001;2280
6. Becker A., Faisal F.H.M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84:2000;3546
7. Lezius M., Blanchet V., Ivanov M.Yu., Stolow A. J. Chem. Phys. 117:2002;1575
8. Harumiya K., Kawata I., Kono H., Fujimura Y. J. Chem. Phys. 113:2000;8953
9. Kawata I., Kono H., Fujimura Y. J. Chem. Phys. 110:1999;11152
10. Becker A., Faisal F.H.M. Opt. Express. 8:2001;383
11. Dirac P.A.M. P. Camb. Philos. Soc. 26:1930;376
12. Frenkel J. Wave Mechanics, Advanced General Theory. 1934;Clarendon Press, Oxford
13. McLachlan A.D. Mol. Phys. 8:1964;39
14. Löwdin P.O., Mukherjee P.K. Chem. Phys. Lett. 14:1972;1
15. Broeckhove J., Lathouwers L., Kesteloot E., van Leuven P. Chem. Phys. Lett. 149:1988;547
16. Raab A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 319:2000;674
17. Ohta K., Kamimae Y., Kodzuka K. J. Mol. Struct. 329:2000;248
18. Dahlen N.E., Leeuwen R.V. Phys. Rev. A. 64:2001;023405
19. Zanghellini J., Kitzler M., Fabian C., Brabec T., Scrinzi A. Laser Phys. 13:2003;1064
20. Zanghellini J., Kitzler M., Brabec T., Scrinzi A. J. Phys. B. 37:2004;763
21. Meyer H.-D., Manthe U., Cederbaum L.S. Chem. Phys. Lett. 165:1990;73
22. Beck M.H., Jäckle A., Worth G.A., Meyer H.-D. Phys. Rep. 324:2000;1
23. kk≤1 [24]. Thus, the assumption used in Eq. (12) is satisfied if we expand the wave function with a physical set of molecular orbitals
24. Löwdin P.O. Phys. Rev. 97:1955;1474
25. Shepard R. Lawley K.P. Advances in Chemical Physics. vol. LXIX:1987;63 Willey, Chichester
26. In general, the orbital transformation of Eq. (21) does not conserve the norm of the wave function of Eq. (4) because of the incomplete length of the determinantal expansion of the wave function (except for the full-CI expansion and the trivial single determinantal TDHF approximation). However, we can evolve the wave function by a unitary scheme that is accurate up to the second-order in Δt. Details of the unitary integration of the coupled nonlinear equations will be reported elsewhere
27. Kosloff R., Tal-Ezer H. Chem. Phys. Lett. 127:1986;223
28. EMSL Gaussian Basis Set Order Form, Available from: 〈http://www. emsl.pnl.gov/forms/basisform.html〉
29. Obara S., Saika A. J. Chem. Phys. 84:1986;3963
30. Schmidt M.W., Baldridge K.K., Boatz J.A., Elbert S.T., Gordon M.S., Jensen J.H., Koseki S., Matsunaga N., Nguyen K.A., Su S., Windus T.L., Dupuis M., Montgomery J.A. Jr. J. Comp. Chem. 14:1993;1347
31. Harumiya K., Kono H., Fujimura Y., Kawata I., Bandrauk A.D. Phys. Rev. A. 66:2002;043403
32. Nakatsuji H. J. Chem. Phys. 113:2000;2949