Legislating equity: The distribution of emergency permit teachers in California

Education Policy Analysis Archives

Volumn 10, Issue , 2002, Pages

  Goe, Laura ^a,b,c,d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

^d University of Memphis ^*  (United States)

^e California's Immediate Intervention   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042674236     PISSN: 10682341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Anderson, M. (1998, November 29). Value-added puts Tennessee on the map. The Commercial Appeal, pp. A18-20.
2. Ballou, D., & Podgursky, M. (1999). Reforming Teacher Preparation and Licensing: What is the Evidence? Teachers College Record.
3. Beginning Teacher Support & Assessment. (2000). About BTSA, [web site]. California Department of Education. Available: http://www.btsa.ca.gov [2000, August 3, 2000].
4. Betts, J. R., Rueben, K. S., & Danenberg, A. (2000). Equal Resources, Equal Outcomes? The Distribution of School Resources and Student Achievement in California. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
5. California Department of Education. (2001). Request for Applications: Teaching as a Priority (TAP) Grant Program. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education.
6. Carroll, S., Reichardt, R., & Guarino, C. (2000). The Distribution of Teachers Among California's School Districts and Schools (MR-1298-0-JIF): RAND.
7. Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning. (2001). The status of the teaching profession 2000: An update to the Teaching and California's Future Task Force: Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning.
8. Chester, M. D., Offenberg, R., & Xu, M. D. (2001). Urban teacher transfer: A four-year cohort study of the school district of Philadelphia faculty. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, Washington.
9. CSR Research Consortium. (1999). Class Size Reduction in California 1996-98: Early Findings Signal Promise and Concerns (report): CSR Research Consortium.
10. CSR Research Consortium. (2002). Class Size Reduction in California: Summary of Findings from 1999-00 and 2000-01.
11. Darling-Hammond, L. (1994). Who will speak for the children? How "Teach for America" hurts urban schools and students. Phi Delta Kappan, 21-34.
12. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: A Review of State Policy Evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Available http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1/.
13. Darling-Hammond, L., Berry, B., & Thoreson, A. (2001). Does teacher certification matter? Evaluating the evidence. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(1), 20.
14. EdSource. (2001). Update on California's teacher workforce issues (Report): EdSource.
15. Ferguson, R. F. (1991). Paying for Public Education: New Evidence on How and Why Money Matters. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28(457), 465-498.
16. Ferguson, R. F., & Ladd, H. (1996). How and why money matters: an analysis of Alabama schools. In H. Ladd (Ed.), Holding Schools Accountable. Performance Based Reform in Education. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institute.
17. Fetler, M. (1999). High School Staff Characteristics and Mathematics Test Results. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7(9).
18. Fideler, E. F., Foster, E. D., & Schwartz, S. (2000). The urban teacher challenge: Teacher demand and supply in the Great City Schools.: Recruiting New Teachers, Inc., Council of the Great City Schools, and Council of the Great City Colleges of Education.
19. Fuller, E. (2000, April, 2000). Do Properly Certified Teachers Matter? Properly Certified Algebra Teachers and Alegebra I Achivement in Texas. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
20. Goe, L., Castro, S., & Curry, S. (2001). Factors Affecting Emergency Credential Teachers' Completion of Full Certification in a Bay Area School District. Berkeley: Bay Area Consortium for Urban Education.
21. Goldhaber, D. D., & Brewer, D. J. (1996, July 1996). Evaluating the effect of teacher degree level on educational performance. Paper presented at the NCES State Data Conference.
22. Goldhaber, D. D., & Brewer, D. J. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(2), 129-145.
23. Goldhaber, D. D., & Brewer, D. J. (2001). Evaluating the evidence on teacher certification: A rejoinder. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(1), 7.
24. Grissmer, D., Flanagan, A., Kawat, J., & Williamson, S. (2000). Improving Student Achievement: What State NAEP Test Scores Tell Us. Santa Monica: RAND.
25. Hanushek, E. A. (1994). Making Schools Work: Improving Performance and Controlling Costs (1st ed.). Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
26. Hanushek, E. A. (1998). Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement (Working Paper). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
27. Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., & Rivkin, S. G. (2001). Why Public Schools Lose Teachers (NBER Working Paper 8599). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
28. Hatch, T. (2000). What happens when improvement programs collide. Working Paper, Carnegie Foundation.
29. Hawk, P., Coble, C. R., & Swanson, M. (1985). Certification: It Does Matter. Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 13-15.
30. Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2001). Teacher Sorting and the Plight of Urban Schools: A Descriptive Analysis.
31. Loeb, S., Darling-Hammond, L., & Luczak, J. (2002). Teacher turnover: The role of working conditions and salaries in recruiting and retaining teachers. San Francisco: Stanford University.
32. Monk, D. H. (1994). Subject Area Preparation of Secondary Mathematics and Science Teachers and Student Achievement. Economics of Education Review, 13(2), 125-145.
33. Mosteller, F. (1995). The Tennessee Study of Class Size in the Early School Grades. The Future of Children, 5(2), 113-127.
34. National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Table 1.04--Percentage of public school districts that required various teacher qualifications when considering teacher applicants, by state: 1999-2000, Schools and Staffing Survey, 1999-2000: U.S. Department of Education.
35. NCES. (1996). Sources of Supply of Newly Hired Teachers, [Internet]. National Center for Education Statistics. Available: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs/ce/ c9656d)1.html [2000, June 27, 2000].
36. Public Policy Institute of California. (2000). School Resources and Student Achievement in California (Research Brief). San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
37. Public Policy Institute of California. (2002). Relationships between class size reduction, new teachers, and student achievement (Research Brief): Public Policy Institute of California.
38. Sahagun, L., & Helfand, D. (2000, May 18, 2000). ACLU Sues State Over Conditions in Poor Schools. Los Angeles Times.
39. Shields, P. M., Humphrey, D. C., Wechsler, M. E., Riehl, L. M., Tiffany-Morales, J., Woodworth, K., Young, V. M., & Price, T. (2001). Teaching and California's Future: The Status of the Teaching Profession 2001. Santa Cruz: The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning.
40. Sutton, A., & Soderstrom, I. (1999). Predicting elementary and secondary school achievement with school-related and demographic factors. The Journal of Educational Research, 92(6), 330-338.
41. Wenglinsky, H. (2002). How Schools Matter: The Link Between Teacher Classroom Practices and Student Academic Performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(12). Available http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n12.html.
42. Wilson, S. M., Darling-Hammond, L., & Berry, B. (2001). Connecticut's Story: A Model of Teaching Policy (Policy Brief): Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
43. Wing, J., Paek, P., Thompson, M., Goe, L., Urrieta, L., Pegram, J., Jinks, T., & Storms, B. (2002). 2000-2001 Evaluation of CFASST: Report on the 2001 Box Review (Evaluation Report): Educational Testing Service.