The public adminstration of organ allocation: Maintaining the public - Private partnership

Public Administration and Management

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 229-249

  Strosberg, Martin A ^a,c   Gimbel, Ron W ^b,d  

^a UNION COLLEGE   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES   (United States)

^d UNION COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042673918     PISSN: 10870091     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Benjamin, Martin, Carl Cohen, and Eugene Grochowski (1994). What Transplantation Can Teach Us about Health Care Reform. New England Journal of Medicine 330 (March 24): 858-860.
2. Childress, James F. (1989). Ethical Criteria for Procuring and Distributing Organs for Transplantation. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 14 (January): 87-114.
3. Childress, James F. (1998). Testimony before the Joint Hearing of the House Commerce Committee and Senate Labor and Human Resources Committee on the Department of Health and Human Services Final Rule for Allocation, "Putting Patients First: Resolving Allocation of Transplant Organs." 105th Congress, Washington, DC., U.S. Government Printing Office.
4. Coburn, Thomas (1999). Hearing before House Committee on Commerce, Subcommittee on Health and Environment, "Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Amendments of 1999 (H.R. 2418)," September 22, 1999. Serial No. 106-75. Washington, DC., U.S. Government Printing Office.
5. Fritschler, A. Lee and James M. Hoefler (1996). Smoking and Politics: Policy Making and the Federal Bureaucracy (fifth edition). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
6. House Commerce Committee. (1999). Report on the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Amendments of 1999, House of Representatives, 1st Session, 106 429, November 1, 1999.
7. Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences (1999). Organ Procurement and Transplantation: Assessing Current Policies and the Potential Impact of the DHHS Final Rule. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
8. Kettl, Donald F. (1993). Sharing Power: Public Governance and Private Markets. Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
9. Longest, Beaufort B. (1998). Health Policymaking in The United States. Chicago: Health Administration Press.
10. Marone, James (1993). The Health Care Bureaucracy: Small Changes, Big Consequences. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 18 (March): 723-39.
11. Mechanic, David (1997). Muddling Through Elegantly: Finding the Proper Balance in Rationing. Health Affairs 16 (May): 82-92.
12. Price, Don K. (1965). The Scientific Estate. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
13. Radin, Beyrl A. (1999). Managing Decentralized Departments: the Case of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, The PricewaterhouseCoopers Endowment for the Business of Government, October, 1999.
14. Rettig, Richard (1989). The Politics of Organ Transplantation: A Parable of Our Time, Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 14 (January): 191-227.
15. Rettig, Richard and Marks, Ellen (1980). Implementing the End-Stage Renal Disease Program of Medicare, Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.
16. Ripley, Randall B. and Grace A. Franklin (1991). Congress and the Bureaucracy and Public Policy, Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
17. Shalala, Donna (1998). Testimony before the Joint Hearing of the House Commerce Committee and Senate Labor and Human Resources Committee on the Department of Health and Human Services Final Rule for Allocation, "Putting Patients First: Resolving Allocation of Transplant Organs." 105th Congress, Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office.
18. Strosberg, Martin A. and Ronald Gimbel (2001). Organ Allocation: The Public Policymaking Process. In The Ethics of Organ Donation and Transplantation, eds. W. Shelton and J. Balint, 231-254. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press (Elsevier Science, Inc.).
19. Task Force on Organ Transplantation (1985). Organ Transplantation: Issues and Recommendations, Washington DC, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
20. Ubel, Peter A. and Arthur L. Caplan (1999). Geographic Favoritism in Liver Transplantation: Unfortunate or Unfair, New England Journal of Medicine 339 (18), 1322-25.
21. UNOS (2000). UNOS News Release, August 4, 2000, Richmond, VA., WWW. UNOS.ORG.
22. U.S. DHHS (1998). Improving Fairness and Effectiveness in Allocating Organs for Transplantation (Fact Sheet), March 26, 1998.
23. U.S. DHHS (1999). Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network: Final Rule (42, CFR 121), October 20, 1999, Federal Register, 64 (202), 56650-61.
24. Veatch, Robert (2000). Transplantation Ethics, Washington, D.C., Georgetown University Press.
25. Wall Street Journal (1998). With Livingston Adding Power as House Speaker, Fight Gets Tougher for Organ-Allocation Reform. November 25, 1998.
26. Washington Post (1996). Who Should Get Liver Transplants? As Demand For Organs Outpaces Donors, Federal Officials May Revamp the Rules. December 9.
27. Washington Post (2000). Wisconsin to Sue Over New Transplant Policy. March 15.