Reconciling Traditional Accuracy Assessment with the ISO Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (ISO/GUM)

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2004, Pages

  Bartley, David L ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHLOROBENZENE;

ACCURACY; CALCULATION; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL SANITATION; INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE; MEASUREMENT; PERFORMANCE; POLLUTION MONITORING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SAMPLING; WORKPLACE; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; REFERENCE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; STATISTICS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GUIDELINES; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WORKPLACE;

EID: 3042672552     PISSN: 15459624     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15459620490432079     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM). Geneva: ISO. 1993.
2. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): Air Quality-Determination of the Uncertainty of the Time Average of Air Quality Measurements. Geneva: ISO. 2002.
3. S.L.R. Ellison, M. Rosslein, and A. Williams (eds.): Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement, 2nd ed. Caparica, Portugal: Eurachem, 2000.
4. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories. Geneva: ISO, 1999.
5. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): Workplace Atmospheres - Controlling and Characterizing Errors in Weighing Collected Aerosols. Geneva: ISO, 2003.
6. Busch, K.A.: Standards completion program slatistical protocol. In Documentation of the NIOSH Validation Tests, D.G. Taylor, R.E. Kupel, J.M. Bryant (eds.). Cincinnati, Ohio: NIOSH (DHEW), 1977.
7. Kennedy, E.R., T.J. Fischbach, R. Song, P.M. Eller, and S.A. Shulman: Guidelines for Air Sampling and Analytical Method Development and Evaluation (DHHS Pub. No. 95-117). Cincinnati, Ohio: NIOSH (DHHS), 1995.
8. Horwitz, W., and R. Albert: The concept of uncertainty as applied to chemical measurements. Analyst 122:615-617 (1997).
9. Vaughn, N.P., C.P. Chalmers, and R.A. Botham: Field comparison of personal samplers for inhalable dust. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 34:553-573 (1990).
10. Bartley, D.L.: Definition and assessment of sampling and analytical accuracy. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 45:357-364 (2001).
11. Bartley, D.L., S.A. Shulman, and P.C. Schlecht: Measurement uncertainty and NIOSH method accuracy range, Chapter P. In: NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, 4th ed., 3rd Suppl., DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2003-154. Cincinnati, Ohio: NIOSH (CDC), 2003.
12. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH): Method 1003. In NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, 4th ed. Cincinnati, Ohio: NIOSH, 1994.
13. Aitchison, J., and I.R. Dunsmore: Statistical Prediction Analysis. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1975.