Matching persuasive messages to experimentally induced needs

Current Research in Social Psychology

Volumn 5, Issue 21, 2000, Pages 1-19

  Julka, Deana L ^a,c   Marsh, Kerry L ^b,d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND   (United States)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^d OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042663742     PISSN: 10887423     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Brock, T. C., L. A. Brannon, and C. Bridgwater (1990). "Message effectiveness can be increased by matching appeals to recipients' self-schemas: Laboratory demonstrations and a national field experiment." In S. J. Agres, J. A. Edell, and T. M. Dubitsky (Eds.), Emotion in advertising: Theoretical and practical explorations (pp. 285-315). New York: Quorum Books.
2. Chaiken, S., R. Giner-Sorolla, and S. Chen (1996). "Beyond accuracy: Defense and impression motives in heuristic and systematic information processing." In P. M. Gollwitzer and J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 553-578). New York: Guilford Press.
3. Chaiken, S., A. Liberman, and A. H. Eagly (1989). "Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context." In J. S. Uleman and J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford Press.
4. DeBono, K. G., and R. J. Harnish (1988). "Source expertise, source attractiveness, and the processing of persuasive information: A functional approach," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55:541-546.
5. DeBono, K. G., and M. Packer (1991). "The effects of advertising appeal on perceptions of product quality," Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17:194-200.
6. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
7. Heider, F. (1946). "Attitudes and cognitive organization," Journal of Psychology, 21:107-112.
8. Hirsch, E. D. (1988). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
9. Hovland, C. L., I. L. Janis, and J. J. Kelley (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10. Julka, D. L., and K. L. Marsh (1994). Attitude functions and the matching hypothesis: Are messages which match an aroused need for information more effective? Unpublished data, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.
11. Katz, D. (1960). "The functional approach to the study of attitudes," Public Opinion Quarterly, 24:163-204.
12. Katz, D., C. McClintock, and D. Sarnoff (1957). "The measurement of ego-defense as related to attitude change," Journal of Personality, 25:465-474.
13. Lewin, K. (1951). "Behavior and development as a function of the total situation." In D Cartwright, (Ed.), Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers (pp. 238-303).
14. Lewin, K. (1961). "Intention, will and need." In T. Shipley (Ed.), Classics in psychology (pp. 1234-1289). New York: Philosophical Library.
15. Maio, G. R., and J. M. Olson (1995a). "Involvement and persuasion: Evidence for different types of involvement," Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 27:64-78.
16. Maio, G. R., and J. M. Olson (1995b). "Relations between values, attitudes, and behavioral intentions: The moderating role of attitude functions," Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31:266-285.
17. Marsh, K. L. (1986). Functional attitude theories revisited: An ecological perspective on attitude change. Unpublished master's thesis, Texas A & M University, College Station.
18. Marsh, K. L. and D. L. Julka (2000). "A Motivational Approach to Experimental Tests of Attitude Functions Theory." In G. R. Maio and J. M. Olson (Eds.), Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes (pp.271-294). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Petty, R. E., and J. T. Cacioppo (1986). "The Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion." In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). New York: Academic Press.
20. Rogers, R. W. (1983). "Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation." In J. T. Cacioppo and R. E. Petty (Eds.), Social psychophysiology: A sourcebook (pp. 153-176). NY: Guilford Press.
21. Rosenberg, M. J. (1956). "Cognitive structure and attitudinal affect," Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53:367-372.
22. Sarnoff, D., and D. Katz (1954). "The motivational bases of attitude change," Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49:115-124.
23. Schwartz, S. (1986). Classic studies in psychology (pp. 128-130). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
24. Shavitt, S. (1989). "Operationalizing functional theories of attitude." In A. R Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler and A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 311-338). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Shavitt, S. (1990). "The role of attitude objects in attitude functions." Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26:124-148.
26. Shavitt, S., and R. H. Fazio (1991). "Effects of attribute salience on the consistency between attitudes and behavior predictions." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17:507-516.
27. Shavitt, S., T. M. Lowrey, and S. Han (1992). "Attitude functions in advertising: The interactive role of products and self-monitoring," Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1:337-364.
28. Shavitt, S., S. Swan, T. M. Lowrey, and M. Wanke (1994). "The interaction of endorser attractiveness and involvement in persuasion depends on the goal that guides message processing." Journal of Consumer Psychology, 3:137-162.
29. Smith, M. B., J. S. Bruner, and R. W. White (1956). Opinions and personality. New York: Wiley.
30. Snyder, M., and K. G. DeBono (1985). "Appeals to image and claims about quality: Understanding the psychology of advertising," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49:586-597.
31. Snyder, M., and K. G. DeBono (1989). "Understanding the functions of attitudes: Lessons from personality and social behavior." In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler and A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 339-359). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Snyder, M. and P. K. Miene (1994). "Stereotyping of the elderly: A functional approach," British Journal of Social Psychology, 33:63-82.
33. Steele, C. M. (1988). "The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self." In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261-302). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
34. Thibodeau, R., and E. Aronson (1992). "Taking a closer look: Reasserting the role of the self-concept in dissonance theory," Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18:591-602.
35. Young, J., C. J. Thomsen, E. Borgida, J. L. Sullivan, and J. H. Aldrich (1991). "When self-interest makes a difference: The role of construct accessibility in political reasoning," Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27:271-296.