The research programme of SCAAT

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals

Volumn 32, Issue SUPPL. 1B, 2004, Pages 679-682

  De Silva, Odile ^a,b   Basketter, David ^a  

^a European Cosmetic Toiletry and Perfumery Association COLIPA   (Belgium)

^b L ORÉAL RECHERCHE   (France)

Author keywords

3D models; Alternative methods; COLIPA; Cosmetic; Eye irritation; Genomics; Research; SCAAT; Skin allergy; Skin irritation; Validation

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVE; CHEMICAL INJURY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CORNEA; DENDRITIC CELL; EUROPE; EYE IRRITATION; GENE CONTROL; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN IRRITATION; SKIN SENSITIZATION; SKIN TOXICITY; TOXICITY TESTING; UPREGULATION;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 3042662795     PISSN: 02611929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/026119290403201s112     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. de Silva, O. (2000). The contributions of the European cosmetics industry to the development of alternatives to animal testing: dialogue with ECVAM and future challenges. ATLA 30, Suppl. 2, 189-193.
2. Bagley, D.M., Bruner, L.H., de Silva, O., Cottin, M., O'Brien, K.A.F., Uttley, M. & Walker, A.P. (1992). An evaluation of five potential alternatives in vitro to the rabbit eye irritation test in vivo. Toxicology in Vitro 6, 275-284.
3. Bruner, L.H., de Silva, O., Earl, L.K., Easty, D.L., Pape, W. & Spielmann, H. (1998). Report on the COLIPA workshop on mechanisms of eye irritation. ATLA 26, 811-820.
4. Balls, M., Berg, N., Bruner, L.H., Curren, R.D., de Silva, O., Earl, L.K., Esdaile, D.J., Fentem, J.H., Liebsch, M., Ohno, Y., Prinsen, M.K., Spielmann, H. & Worth, A.P. (1999). Eye irritation testing: the way forward. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 34. ATLA 27, 53-77.
5. van de Sandt, H., Roguet, R., Cohen, C., Esdaile, D., Ponec, M., Corsini, E., Barker, C., Fusenig, N., Liebsch, M., Benford, D., de Brugerolle de Fraissinette, A. & Fartasch, M. (1999). The use of human keratinocytes and human skin models for predicting skin irritation. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 38. ATLA 27, 723-743.
6. Fentem, J.H., Briggs, D., Chesné, C., Elliott, G.R., Harbell, J.W., Keyling, J.R., Portes, P., Roguet, R., van de Sandt, H. & Botham, P. (2001). A prevalidation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation: results and evaluation by the management team. Toxicology in Vitro 15, 57-93.
7. Zuang, V., Balls, M., Botham, P., Coquette, A., Corsini, E., Curren, R.D., Elliott, G.R., Fentem, J.H., Heylings, J.R., Liebsch, M., Medina, J., Roguet, R., van de Sandt, H., Wiemann, C. & Worth, A.P. (2002). Follow up to the ECVAM prevalidation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation. ECVAM Skin Irritation Task Force Report 2. ATLA 30, 109-129.
8. de Silva, O., Basketter, D.A., Barrat, M.D., Corsini, E., Cronin, M.T.D., Das, P.K., Degwert, J., Enk, A., Garrigue, J.L., Hauser, C., Kimber, I., Lepoittevin, J.P., Peguet, J. & Ponec, M. (1996). Alternative methods for skin sensitisation testing. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 19. ATLA 24, 683-705.
9. Pichowski, J.S., Cumberbatch, M., Dearman, R.J., Basketter, D.A. & Kimber, I. (2000). Investigation of induced changes in interleukin 1β mRNA expression by cultured human dentritic cells as an in vitro approach to skin sensitisation testing. Toxicology in Vitro 14, 351-360.
10. Smith, C. & Hotchkiss, S. (2001). Allergic Contact Dermatitis. Chemical and Metabolic Mechanisms, 344pp. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
11. Rousset, F., Verda, D., Arrighi, J.F., Péguet-Navarro, J. & Cottin, M. (2000). A strategy for the prediction of skin sensitisation: an alternative to animal testing. In Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation (ed. M. Balls, A-M. van Zeller & M.E. Halder), pp. 635-642. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V.