Time response of interstitial fluid pressure measurements in cervix cancer

Microvascular Research

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 63-70

  Khosravani, Houman ^a   Chugh, Brige ^b   Milosevic, Michael F ^c,d   Norwich, Kenneth H ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biophysics; Cervical cancer; Interstitial fluid pressure; Mathematical model

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CULTURE MEDIUM; DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; POROSITY; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SAMPLE; TISSUE PRESSURE; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

BIOPHYSICS; DISEASE PROGRESSION; EXTRACELLULAR FLUID; EXTRACELLULAR SPACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICROCIRCULATION; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; OXYGEN; PRESSURE; TIME FACTORS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 3042662349     PISSN: 00262862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mvr.2004.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aukland K., Reed R.K. Interstitial-lymphatic mechanisms in the control of extracellular fluid volume. Physiol. Rev. 73:1993;1-78
2. Baxter L.T., Jain R.K. Transport of fluid and macromolecules in tumors I: role of interstitial pressure and convection. Microvasc. Res. 37:1989;77-104
3. Boucher Y., Baxter L.T., Jain R.K. Interstitial pressure gradients in isolated tissue and subcutaneous tumors: implications for therapy. Cancer Res. 50:1990;4478-4484
4. Boucher Y., Jain R.K. Microvascular pressure is the principal driving force for interstitial hypertension in solid tumors: implications for vascular collapse. Cancer Res. 52(18):1992;5110-5114
5. Boucher Y., Brekken C., Netti P.A., Baxter L.T., Jain R.K. Intratumoral infusion of fluid: estimation of hydraulic conductivity and implications for the delivery of therapeutic agents. Br. J. Cancer. 78(11):1998;1442-1448
6. DiResta G.R., Lee J., Larson S.M., Arbit E. Characterization of neuroblastoma xenograft in rat flank: I. Growth, interstitial fluid pressure, and interstitial fluid velocity distribution profiles. Microvasc. Res. 46(2):1993;158-177
7. Eskey C.J., Koretsky A.P., Domach M.M., Jain R.K. H-Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of tumor blood flow: spatial and temporal heterogeneity in tissue-isolated mammary adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 52:1992;6010-6019
8. Fadnes H.O., Reed R.K., Aukland K. Interstitial fluid pressure in rats measured with a modified wick technique. Microvasc. Res. 14:1977;27-36
9. Guyton A.C., Hall J.E. Textbook of Medical Physiology. tenth ed. 2000;W.B. Saunders, London
10. Guyton A.C., Scheel K., Murphree D. Interstitial fluid pressure III. Its effect on resistance to tissue fluid mobility. Circ. Res. 19:1966;412-419
11. Jain R.K. Transport of molecules in the tumor interstitium: a review. Cancer Res. 47(12):1987;3039-3051
12. Jain R.K. Determinants of tumor blood flow: a review. Cancer Res. 48(10):1988;2641-2658
13. Jain R.K. Physiological barriers to delivery of monoclonal antibodies and other macromolecules in tumors. Cancer Res. 50:1990;814-819
14. Jain R.K., Baxter L.T. Mechanisms of heterogeneous distribution of monoclonal antibodies and other macromolecules in tumors: significance of elevated interstitial pressure. Cancer Res. 48(24 Pt 1):1988;7022-7032
15. Khosravani, H., Milosevic, M.F., Norwich, K.H., 2003. Bench-top experiments using a water column as a steady pressure source, an albumin laden SDS-PAGE gel as a model of a tissue-like porous medium, and identical IFP measurement needle were used to approximate the amount of fluid flow over 15 s interval for a pressure source of 30 mm Hg. To the water ink was added to allow for visualization of fluid distribution entering the gel (unpublished observations).
16. Leu A.J., Berk D.A., Lymboussaki A., Alitalo K., Jain R.K. Absence of functional lymphatics within a murine sarcoma: a molecular and functional evaluation. Cancer Res. 60(16):2000;4324-4327
17. Milnor W.R. Hemodynamics. second ed. 1989;312 Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore
18. Milosevic M.F., Fyles A.W., Wong R., Pintilie M., Kavanagh M.C., Levin W., Manchul L.A., Keane T.J., Hill R.P. Interstitial fluid pressure in cervical carcinoma: within tumor heterogeneity, and relation to oxygen tension. Cancer. 82(12):1998;2418-2426
19. Milosevic M., Fyles A., Hedley D., Pintilie M., Levin W., Manchul L., Hill R. Interstitial fluid pressure predicts survival in patients with cervix cancer independent of clinical prognostic factors and tumor oxygen measurements. Cancer Res. 61(17):2001;6400-6405
20. Mollica F., Netti P.A., Jain R.K. A model for temporal heterogeneities of tumor blood flow. Microvasc. Res. 65:2003;56-60
21. Netti P.A., Baxter L.T., Boucher Y., Skalak R., Jain R.K. Time dependent behavior of interstitial fluid pressure in solid tumors: implications for drug delivery. Cancer Res. 55(22):1995;5451-5458
22. Press W.H., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T., Flannery B.P. Numerical Recipes in C++: The Art of Scientific Computing. 2002;Cambridge Univ. Press, New York
23. Scheidegger A.E. The Physics of Flow Through Porous Media. 1974;University of Toronto Press, Toronto
24. Stohrer M., Boucher Y., Stangassinger M., Jain R.K. Oncotic pressure in solid tumors is elevated. Cancer Res. 60(15):2000;4251-4255
25. Swabb E.A., Wei J., Gullino P.M. Diffusion and convection in normal and neoplastic tissues. Cancer Res. 34:1974;2814-2822