Origin of magnetic and magnetoelastic tweedlike precursor modulations in ferroic materials

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 92, Issue 19, 2004, Pages

  Saxena, A ^a,b   Castan T ^a   Planes, A ^a   Porta, M ^a   Kishi, Y ^c   Lograsso, T A ^d   Viehland, D ^e   Wuttig, M ^c   De Graef, M ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^d IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e State University   (United States)

^f CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COBALT ALLOYS; CRYSTAL SYMMETRY; ELASTICITY; ELECTRON DIFFRACTION; FERROMAGNETISM; FREE ENERGY; MAGNETIC ANISOTROPY; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MAGNETIZATION; MAGNETORESISTANCE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PHASE TRANSITIONS; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

LONG RANGE INTERACTIONS; MAGNETIC TWEEDS; MAGNETOELASTIC TWEEDS; STRUCTURAL TRANSITION TEMPERATURE;

MAGNETIC MATERIALS;

EID: 3042658603     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.197203     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Y. Imry and M. Wortis, Phys. Rev. B 19, 3580 (1979).
2. S. Kartha et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3630 (1991); Phys. Rev. B 52, 803 (1995), and references therein.
3. S. Kartha et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3630 (1991); Phys. Rev. B 52, 803 (1995), and references therein.
4. The origin of the term tweed [L. E. Tanner, Philos. Mag. 14, 111 (1966)] comes from the striations observed in bright-field TEM.
5. S.M. Shapiro et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 3199 (1986).
6. R. D. Gomez, in Experimental Methods in the Physical Sciences, edited by M. De Graef and Y. Zhu (Academic, San Diego, 2001), Vol. 36, p. 69.
7. M. De Graef, in Experimental Methods in the Physical Sciences (Ref. [5]), p. 27.
8. Z. Xu et al., Philos. Mag. A 74, 395 (1996).
9. S. R. Shenoy et al., Phys. Rev. B 60, R12537 (1999).
10. Short-range anisotropy such as magnetocrystalline and magnetostriction, although relevant in other contexts, is not essential here. See, e.g., G. Bertotti, Hysteresis in Magnetism (Academic, San Diego, 1998).
11. Y. Murakami et al., Acta Mater. 50, 2173 (2002).
12. Y. Kishi et al., I Phys. IV (France) 112, 1021 (2003).
13. H.S. Park et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 3752 (2003).
14. M. De Graef, Introduction to Conventional Transmission Electron Microscopy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003), Chap. 10.
15. A. Planes et al, Phys. Rev. Lett 79, 3926 (1997).
16. A. N. Vasil'ev et al., Phys. Rev. B 59, 1113 (1999).
17. B. P. Stojković et al., Phys. Rev. B 62, 4353 (2000).
18. G. R. Barsch and J. A Krumhansl, Phys. Rev. Lett 53, 1069 (1984).
19. For the dyadic notation, see, e.g., K.R. Symon, Mechanics (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 1971).
20. 3) provided we redefine the dipole vector.
21. O. Tikhomirov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 147601 (2002).
22. L. Yiping et al., Phys. Rev. B 54, 3033 (1996).
23. S. Sergeenkov and M. Ausloos, Phys. Rev. B 52, 3614 (1995).