Regarding "safety of gadolinium contrast angiography in patients with chronic renal insufficiency" [1] (multiple letters)

Journal of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 204-

  Nyman, Ulf ^a   Golman, Klaes ^b   Morasch, Mark D ^c   Pereles, F Scott ^c   Sam II, Albert D ^c   Collins, Jeremy ^c   Song, Gina ^c   Chen, Richard ^c  

^a Department of Radiology ^*  (Sweden)

^b Amersham Health RandD AB   (Sweden)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ANGIOGRAPHY; CHRONIC KIDNEY FAILURE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTRAST RADIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; HYPEROSMOLARITY; KIDNEY DYSFUNCTION; LETTER; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAFETY; UREMIA;

EID: 3042657315     PISSN: 07415214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.03.041     Document Type: Letter

References (2)

1. U Nyman B Elmståhl P Leander M Nilsson K Golman T Almén Are gadolinium-based contrast media really safer than iodinated media for digital subtraction angiography in patients with azotemia Radiology 223 2002 311 318
2. B Elmståhl P Leander U Nyman C.M Chai T Almén B Frennby Nephrotoxicity after renal angiography using iodine and gadolinium contrast media in pigs with renal damage Acad Radiol 9 Suppl 2 2002 S531 534