The effects of cut-off length on surface roughness parameters and their correlation with transition friction

Safety Science

Volumn 42, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 755-769

  Chang, Wen Ruey ^a   Hirvonen, Mikko ^b   Grönqvist, Raoul ^b  

^a LIBERTY MUTUAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR SAFETY   (United States)

^b FINNISH INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH   (Finland)

Author keywords

Cut off length; Surface roughness; Transition friction

Indexed keywords

CONTAMINATION; CORRELATION METHODS; FRICTION; MATERIALS TESTING; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; QUARRIES; TILE;

CUT-OFF LENGTHS; NEOLITE;

SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

GLYCEROL; WATER;

BUILDING; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; FILTRATION; FRICTION; OCCUPATIONAL ACCIDENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SURFACE PROPERTY;

EID: 3042656789     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2004.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 1996. Surface texture (surface roughness, waviness, and lay), ASME B46.1-1995. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York
2. Chang W.R. The effect of surface roughness on dynamic friction between neolite and quarry tile. Safety Science. 29(2):1998;89-105
3. Chang W.R. The effect of surface roughness on the measurements of slip resistance. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 24(3):1999;299-313
4. Chang W.R. The effect of filtering process on surface parameters and their correlation with the measured friction. Part II: Porcelain tile. Safety Science. 36(1):2000;35-47
5. Chang W.R. The effect of surface roughness and contaminant on the dynamic friction of porcelain tile. Applied Ergonomics. 32(2):2001;173-184
6. Chang W.R. The effects of surface roughness and contaminants on the dynamic friction between porcelain tile and vulcanized rubber. Safety Science. 40(7-8):2002;577-591
7. Chang W.R., Matz S. The effect of filtering process on surface parameters and their correlation with the measured friction. Part I: Quarry tile. Safety Science. 36(1):2000;19-33
8. Chang W.R., Kim I.J., Manning D., Bunterngchit Y. The role of surface roughness in the measurement of slipperiness. Ergonomics. 44(13):2001;1200-1216
9. Chang W.R., Grönqvist R., Leclercq S., Myung R., Makkonen L., Strandberg L., Brungraber R., Mattke U., Thorpe S. The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness. Part 1: Friction mechanisms and definition of test conditions. Ergonomics. 44(13):2001;1217-1232
10. Courtney T.K., Sorock G.S., Manning D.P., Collins J.W., Holbein-Jenny M.A. Occupational slip, trip, and fall-related injuries - can the contribution of slipperiness be isolated. Ergonomics. 44(13):2001;1118-1137
11. Grönqvist, R., 1995. A dynamic method for assessing pedestrian slip resistance, People and Work. Research reports 2. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, p. 156
12. Grönqvist R., Roine J., Järvinen E., Korhonen E. An apparatus and a method for determining the slip resistance of shoes and floors by simulation of human foot motions. Ergonomics. 32(8):1989;979-995
13. Grönqvist R., Roine J., Korhonen E., Rahikainen A. Slip resistance versus surface roughness of deck and other underfoot surfaces in ships. Journal of Occupational Accidents. 13:1990;291-302
14. Harris G.W., Shaw S.R. Slip resistance of floors: users' opinions, Tortus instrument readings and roughness measurement. Journal of Occupational Accidents. 9:1988;287-298
15. International Organization of Standardization (ISO), 1996. Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) - Surface Texture: Profile Method - Rules and Procedures for the Assessment of Surface Texture. ISO 4288. International Organization of Standardization, Switzerland, 1996
16. Kim I.J., Smith R. Observation of the floor surface topography changes in pedestrian slip resistance measurements. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 26:2000;581-601
17. Leamon T.B., Murphy P.L. Occupational slips and falls: more than a trivial problem. Ergonomics. 38:1995;487-498
18. Lloyd D.G., Stevenson M.G. An investigation of floor surface profile characteristics that will reduce the incidence of slips and falls. Mechanical Engineering Transactions, Institute of Engineers, Australia. ME17(2):1992;99-105
19. Manning D.P., Jones C. The superior slip-resistance of footwear soling compound T66/103. Safety Science. 18:1994;45-60
20. Manning D.P., Jones C., Bruce M. Proof of shoe slip-resistance by a walking traction test. Journal of Occupational Accidents. 12:1990;255-270
21. Proctor T.D., Coleman V. Slipping, tripping and falling accidents in Great Britain - present and future. Journal of Occupational Accidents. 9:1988;269-285
22. Rank Taylor Hobson Limited, 1996. The Form Talysurf Series 2 Operator's Handbook. Publication Number K505/9, Leicester, UK
23. Stevenson M.G., Hoang K., Bunterngchit Y., Lloyd D.G. Measurement of slip resistance of shoes on floor surfaces. Part 1: Methods. Journal of Occupational Health Safety - Aust NZ. 5(2):1989;115-120
24. Whitehouse D.J. Handbook of Surface Metrology. 1994;Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, UK