The use of genetic tools for the evaluation of a potential migration barrier for the bullhead

Journal of Fish Biology

Volumn 64, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1737-1744

  Knaepkens, G ^a   Verheyen, E ^b   Galbusera, P ^a   Eens, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b ROYAL BELGIAN INSTITUTE OF NATURAL SCIENCES   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Conservation; Cottus gobio; Fragmentation; Genetic diversity; Microsatellite; Migration barrier

Indexed keywords

GENETIC ANALYSIS;

COTTUS; COTTUS GOBIO; GOBIO;

EID: 3042655191     PISSN: 00221112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00423.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aljanabi, S. M. & Martinez, I. (1997). Universal and rapid salt-extraction of high quality genomic DNA for PCR-based techniques. Nucleic Acids Research 25, 4692-4693.
2. e) reveals genetic compensation in steelhead trout. Molecular Ecology 12, 35-49.
3. Beerli, P. & Felsenstein, J. (1999). Maximum-likelihood estimation of migration rates and effective population numbers in two populations using a coalescent approach. Genetics 152, 763-773.
4. Belkhir, K., Borsa, P., Goudet, J. & Bonhomme, F. (1996). Genetix, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique de population. Laboratoire Génome et Populations. Montpellier: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UPR 9060, Université de Montpellier II.
5. Bellinger, M. R., Johnson, J. A., Toepfer, J. & Dunn, P. (2003). Loss of genetic variation in greater prairie chickens following a population bottleneck in Wisconsin, USA. Conservation Biology 17, 717-724.
6. Cowx, I. G. & Welcomme, R. L. (1998). Rehabilitation of Rivers for Fish. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
7. Downhower, J. F., Lejeune, P., Gaudin, P. & Brown, L. (1990). Movements of the chabot (Cottus gobio) in a small stream. Polskie Archiwum Hydrobiologii 37, 119-126.
8. England, P. R. & Osler, G. H. R. (2001). GENELOSS: a computer program for simulating the effects of population bottlenecks on genetic diversity. Molecular Ecology Notes 1, 111-113.
9. England, P. R., Osler, G. H. R., Woodworth, L. K. M., Montgomery, M. E., Briscoe, D. A. & Frankham, R. (2003). Effects of intense v. diffuse population bottlenecks on microsatellite genetic diversity and evolutionary potential. Conservation Genetics 4, 595-604.
10. Englbrecht, C. C., Largiadèr, C. R., Hänfling, B. & Tautz, D. (1999). Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci in the European bullhead Cottus gobio L. (Osteichthyes) and their applicability to related taxa. Molecular Ecology 8, 1957-1969.
11. Frankham, R. (1995). Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review. Genetical Research 66, 95-107.
12. Gaggiotti, O. E., Lange, O., Rassmann, K. & Gliddon, C. (1999). A comparison of two indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow using microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology 8, 1513-1519.
13. Goudet, J. (2001). FSTAT, a Program to Estimate and Test Gene Diversities and Fixation Indices. Lausanne: Institute of Ecology, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
14. Hänfling, B. & Brandi, R. (1998). Genetic differentiation of the bullhead Cottus gobio L. across watersheds in Central Europe: evidence for two taxa. Heredity 80, 110-117.
15. Hänfling, B., Hellemans, B., Volckaert, F. A. M. & Carvalho, G. R. (2002). Late glacial history of the cold-adapted freshwater fish Cottus gobio, revealed by microsatellites. Molecular Ecology 11, 1717-1729.
16. Jungwirth, M., Schmutz, S. & Weiss, S. (1998). Fish Migration and Fish Bypasses. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
17. Knaepkens, G., Knapen, D., Bervoets, L., Hänfling, B., Verheyen, E. & Eens, M. (2002). Genetic diversity and condition factor: a significant relationship in Flemish but not in German populations of the European bullhead (Cottus gobio L.). Heredity 89, 280-287.
18. Knaepkens, G., Bervoets, L., Verheyen, E. & Eens, M. (2004). Relationship between population size and genetic diversity in endangered populations of the European bullhead (Cottus gobio): implications for conservation. Biological Conservation 115, 403-410.
19. Knapen, D., Knaepkens, G., Bervoets, L., Taylor, M. I., Eens, M. & Verheyen, E. (2003). Conservation units based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA variation among European bullhead populations (Cottus gobio) from Flanders (Belgium). Conservation Genetics 4, 129-140.
20. Lelek, A. (1987). The Freshwater Fishes of Europe, Vol. 9. Wiesbaden: Aula-Verlag.
21. Lucas, L. C. & Baras, E. (2001). Migration of Freshwater Fishes. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
22. Marconato, A. & Bisazza, A. (1988). Mate choice, egg cannibalism and reproductive success in the river bullhead, Cottus gobio L. Journal of Fish Biology 33, 905-916.
23. Meffe, G. K. & Carroll, C. R. (1997). Principles of Conservation Biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
24. Mills, C. A. & Mann, R. H. K. (1983). The bullhead Cottus gobio, a versatile and successful fish. Annual Report of the Freshwater Biological Association 51, 76-88.
25. Morita, K. & Yamamoto, S. (2002). Effects of habitat fragmentation by damming on the persistence of stream-dwelling charr populations. Conservation Biology 16, 1318-1323.
26. Nielsen, J. L., Carpanzano, C., Fountain, M. C. & Gan, C. A. (1997). Mitochondrial DNA and nuclear microsatellite diversity in hatchery and wild Oncorhynchus mykiss from freshwater habitats in southern California. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 12, 397-417.
27. Nunney, L. (1993). The influence of mating system and overlapping generations on effective population size. Evolution 47, 1329-1341.
28. Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M. & Donnelly, P. (2000). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945-959.
29. Raymond, M. & Rousset, F. (1995). GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86, 248-249.
30. Riffel, M. & Schreiber, A. (1995). Coarse-grained population structure in Central European sculpin (Cottus gobio L.): secondary contact or ongoing genetic drift? Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 33, 173-184.
31. Robison, E. G., Mirati, A. & Allen, M. (1999). Oregon Road/Stream Crossing Restoration Guide. Salem, OR: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
32. Schneider, S., Roessli, D. & Excoffier, L. (2000). Arlequin, Version 2.0: A Software for Population Genetic Data Analysis. Geneva: Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
33. Shrimpton, M. J. & Heath, D. D. (2003). Census v. effective population size in chinook salmon: large- and small-scale environmental perturbation effects. Molecular Ecology 12, 2571-2583.
34. Smyly, W. J. P. (1957). The life history of the bullhead or Miller's thumb (Cottus gobio L.). Proceedings of the Zoological Society London 128, 431-453.
35. Utzinger, J., Roth, C. & Peter, A. (1998). Effects of environmental parameters on the distribution of bullhead Cottus gobio with particular consideration of the effects of obstructions. Journal of Applied Ecology 35, 882-892.
36. Vandelannoote, A., Yseboodt, R., Bruylants, B., Verheyen, R., Coeck, J., Maes, J., Belpaire, C., Van Thuyne, G., Denayer, B., Beyens, J., De Charleroy, D. & Vandenabeele, P. (1998). Atlas van de Vlaamse Beek- en Riviervissen. Antwerpen: W.E.L.
37. Vucetich, J. A., Waite, T. A. & Nunney, L. (1997). Fluctuating population size and the ratio of effective to census population size. Evolution 51, 2017-2021.
38. Williams, B. L., Brawn, J. D. & Paige, K. N. (2003). Landscape scale genetic effects of habitat fragmentation on a high gene flow species: Speyeria idalia (Nymphalidae). Molecular Ecology 12, 11-20.