Labour market theories and distance education: A response

Open Learning

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 47-52

  Rumble, Greville ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042653383     PISSN: 02680513     EISSN: 14699958     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0268051960110208     Document Type: Note

References (30)

1. BOURDIEU, P., PASSERON, J‐C, and SAINT MARTIN, M. de. 1994. Academic discourse. Linguistic misunderstanding and professorial power, Cambridge: Polity Press.
2. CAMPION, M., JARVIS, P., and PETERS, O., 1996. Responses to Labour Market Theories and Distance Education. Open Learning, 11(1): 41–54.
3. CAMPION, M., and RENNER, W., 1992. The supposed demise of Fordism: implications for distance education and higher education. Distance Education, 13(1): 7–28.
4. CAMPION, M., and RENNER, W., 1995. “ Goal setting, domestication and academia: the beginnings of an analysis ”. In Academic work. The changing labour process in higher education, Edited by: SMYTH, J., Buckingham: Society of Research into Higher Education and Open University Press. 1995
5. CHILD, J., 1984. Organisation. A guide to problems and practice, (2nd.edn.), London: Paul Chapman.
6. DRUCKER, P.F., 1993. Post‐capitalist society, London: Butterworth‐Heinemann.
7. FARNES, N., 1993. Modes of production: Fordism and distance education. Open Learning, 8(1): 10–20.
8. FLEW, A., ed. 1984. A dictionary of philosophy, London: Pan Books.
9. GARRAHAN, P., and STEWART, P., 1992. The Nissan enigma. Flexibility at work in a local economy, London: Mansell Publishing Ltd.
10. GRINT, K., 1991. The sociology of work. An introduction, London: Macmillan.
11. HAMILTON, D., 1989. Towards a theory of schooling, London: The Falmer Press.
12. HOLLWAY, W., 1991. Work psychology and organizational behaviour. Managing the individual at work, Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
13. HUTTON, W., 1995. The state we're in, London: Jonathan Cape.
14. LAIDLAW, B., and LAYARD, R., 1974. Traditional versus Open University teaching methods: a cost comparison. Higher Education, 3: 439–68.
15. LITTLER, C., 1982. The development of the labour process in capitalist societies. A comparative study of the transformation of work organisation in Britain, Japan and the USA, Aldershot: Gower.
16. MATHEWS, J., 1989. The age of democracy: the politics of post‐Fordism, Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
17. MINTZBERG, H., 1979. The structuring of organizations, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice‐Hall.
18. NEWTON, T., HANDY, J., and FINEMAN, S., 1995. Managing stress. Emotion and power at work, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.
19. PERRY, W., 1976. The Open University. A personal account by the first Vice‐Chancellor, Milton Keynes: W Open University Press.
20. PETERS, O., 1983. “ Distance teaching and industrial production. A comparative interpretation in outline ”. In Distance education: international perspectives, Edited by: SEWART, D., KEEGAN, D., and HOLM‐BERG, B., London: Croom Helm.
21. POLLERT, A., 1991. “ The orthodoxy of flexibility ”. In Farewell to flexibility?, Edited by: POLLERT, A., Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 1991
22. RAGGATT, P., 1993. Post‐Fordism and distance education ‐ a flexible strategy for change. Open Learning, 8(1): 21–31.
23. RITZER, G., 1993. The McDonaldization of society, Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
24. RUMBLE, G., 1987. Why distance education can be cheaper than conventional education. Distance Education, 8(1): 72–94.
25. RUMBLE, G., 1995a. Labour market theories and distance education I: Industrialisation and distance education. Open Learning, 10(1): 10–20.
26. RUMBLE, G., 1995b. Labour market theories and distance education II: How Fordist is distance education?. Open Learning, 10(2): 12–28.
27. RUMBLE, G., 1995c. Labour market theories and distance education II: Post‐Fordism ‐ the way forward?. Open Learning, 10(3): 25–42.
28. SEWART, D., 1993. Student support services in distance education. Open Learning, 8(3): 3–12.
29. TAIT, A., 1994. The end of innocence: Critical approaches to open and distance learning. Open Learning, 9(3): 27–36.
30. WATKINS, P., 1994. “ The Fordist/post‐Fordist debate: The educational implications ”. In Economising education: The Post‐Fordist directions, Edited by: KENWAY, J., Geelong: Deakin University Press. 1994