An examination of the longitudinal effect of the Washington Assessment of Student Learning (WASL) on student achievement

Education Policy Analysis Archives

Volumn 11, Issue , 2003, Pages

  Orlich, Donald C ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042653316     PISSN: 10682341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Abbott, M. L. & Joireman, J. (2001, July). The relationships among achievement, low income, and ethnicity across six groups of Washington state students. Lynnwood, WA: Washington School Research Center, Technical Report #1.
2. Amrein, A. L. & Berliner, D. C. (2002a, March 28). High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(18). Retrieved April 10, 2002 from http://epasa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n18/
3. Amrein, A. L. & Berliner, D. C. (2002b, December). The impact of high-stakes tests on student academic performance: an analysis of NAEP results in states with high-stakes tests and ACT, SAT, and AP test results in states with high school graduation exams. Education Policy Research Unit, Education Policy Studies Laboratory, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ. (EPSL-0211-126-EPRU).
4. Amrein, A. L. & Beliner, D. C. (2002c, December). An analysis of some unintended and negative consequences of high-stakes testing. Education Policy Research Unit, Education Policy Studies Laboratory, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ. (EPSL-0211-125- EPRU).
5. Basarab, S. (2001, February). An overview of student assessment in Washington state. Unpublished Report. Citizens United for Responsible Education (CURE). Burien: WA. Web site of CURE is at: http://www.eskimo.com/~cure/
6. Bloom, B. S. et al. (1956) Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.
7. Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13 (6), 4-16.
8. Brown, D. (2001, May 17). Staffing paper: MEA for Mesa, Arizona trip. Olympia, WA: Office of State Superintendent of Public Instruction files.
9. Camara, W. J. & Powers, D. (1999, July). Coaching and the SAT. Society for Industrial Psychology Inc. Retrieved August 27, 2002, from http://stop.org/tip/backissues/tipjuly99/4camara.htm.
10. Campbell, J. R., Voelke, K. E., & Donahue, P. L. (1998, August). Report in brief: NAEP trends in academic progress, revised. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, (NCES no. 998-530).
11. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Contract No. 120-761. (2001, September 20). Riverside Publishing Contract with Superintendent of Public Instruction for WASL implementation.
13. Darling-Hammond, L. (2003). Standards and assessments: Where we are and what we need. Teachers College Record. Retrieved February 27, 2003 from http://www.tcrecord.org/Contentasp?ContentID=11109
14. Education Profile. State Superintendent of Public Instruction. Olympia, WA. Retrieved at http://www.k12.wa.us/edprofile/state
15. Epstein, H. T. (2002). Biopsychologicalaspects of memory and education. In S. P. Shohov, (Ed.). Advances in Psychology Research, vol. 11. New York: Nova, 181-186.
16. Fouts, J. T. (2002, April). The power of early success: A longitudinal study of student performance on the Washington assessment of student learning, 1998-2001. Lynnwood, WA: Washington School Research Center, Research Report #1.
17. Glass, G. V. (1980). Summarizing effect sizes. In R. Rosenthal, (Ed.). New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science: Quantitative assessment of research domain. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Keim, W. G. (2002). School accountability and fairness: A policy study of the 2000 Washington state school accountability criteria. Pullman, WA: Washington State University, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.
19. Linn, R. L., Baker, E. V., & Betebenner, D. W. Accountability systems: Implications of requirements of the no child left behind act of 2001. Educational Researcher, 31 (6), 3-16.
20. Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
21. Orlich, D. C. (2000). A critical analysis of the grade four Washington assessment of student learning. Curriculum In Context, 27 (2), 10-14
22. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Public Law No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
23. SRI International. (2002, November 30). A review of the Washington assessment of student learning in mathematics: Grades 7 and 10. Final Report. SRI Project Number: P12089. Olympia, WA: The Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
24. Taylor, C. S. & Lee, Y. (2001, October 18). Washington assessment of student learning grade 4, 2000 technical report. Olympia, WA: Office of the State Superintendent of Public Instruction.
25. Walberg, H. J. (1999). Productive teaching. In H. C. Waxman and H. J. Walberg, (Eds.), New directions for teaching practice and research (pp. 75-104). Berkeley: CA: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.