Experimental design: Computer simulation for improving the precision of an experiment

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals

Volumn 32, Issue SUPPL. 1B, 2004, Pages 607-611

  Van Wilgenburg, Henk ^a   Van Schaick Zillesen, Piet G ^b   Krulichova, Iva ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b VAN HALL LARENSTEIN UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^c CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Animal reduction; CAL; Computer simulation; Experimental design; Sample size

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TESTING REDUCTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; EDUCATION PROGRAM; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; SAMPLING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 3042651961     PISSN: 02611929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/026119290403201s102     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Russell, W.M.S. & Burch, R.L. (1959). The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, 238pp. London, UK: Methuen (reprinted by the Universities Federation for Animal Welfare, South Mimms. Potters Bar, Herts, UK).
2. Fisher, R.A. (1935). The Design of Experiments, 1st. edition. Edinburgh, UK: Oliver and Boyd.
3. Clarke, G.M. & Kempson R.E. (1997). Introduction to the Design and Analysis of Experiments. London, UK: Arnold.
4. Cox, D.R. (1958). Planning Experiments. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley and Sons.
5. Mead, R. (1988). The Design of Experiments, 620pp. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Montgomery, D.C. (1997). Design and Analysis of Experiments, 4th edition. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
7. Chapman, P.F., Crane, M., Wile, J.A., Noppert, F. & Mclndoe, E.C. (1996). Asking the Right Questions: Ecotoxicology and Statistics. Workshop report. Brussels, Belgium: SETAC Europe.
8. Prentice, R.L. & Gloeckler, L.A. (1978). Regression analysis of grouped survival data with application to breast cancer data. Biometrics 34, 57-67.
9. Festing, M.F.W. (1995). Reduction of animal use and experimental design. In World Congress on Alternatives and Animal use in the Life Sciences: Education, Research, Testing (ed. A.M. Goldberg & L.F.M. van Zutphen) pp. 43-49. Larchmont, NY, USA: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
10. Festing, M.F.W. (1994). Reduction of animal use: experimental design and quality of experiments. Laboratory Animals 28, 212-221.
11. Festing M.F.W. (2000). Reduction, model development and efficient experimental design. In Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation (ed. M. Balls, A-M. van Zeller & M.E. Halder), pp. 721-727. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V.
12. Van Wilgenburg, H. (1995). Simulated animal preparations in pharmacology teaching. In World Congress on Alternatives and Animal use in the Life Sciences: Education, Research, Testing (ed. A.M. Goldberg & L.F.M. van Zutphen), pp. 559-565. Larchmont, NY, USA: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
13. Festing, M.F.W. (2000). Common errors in the statistical analysis of experimental data. In Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation (ed. M. Balls, A-M. van Zeller & M.E. Halder), pp. 753-758. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V.
14. Festing, M.F.W. (1996). Are animal experiments in toxicological research the "right" size? In Statistics in Toxicology (ed. B.J.T. Morgan), pp. 3-11. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
15. Finney, D.J. (1991). Probit Analysis, 3rd edition, 333pp. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Van Wilgenburg, H. (1997). Computer simulations in education. In Animal Alternatives, Welfare and Ethics (ed. L.F.M. Van Zutphen & M. Balls), pp. 467-476. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V.