A use-case based model for learning resources in educational mediators

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 149-163

  Quemada, Juan ^a   Simon, Bernd ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Austria)

Author keywords

Brokerage; Educational mediators; Interoperability; Learning object metadata; Learning resource reuse; Modelling; Standards

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042641857     PISSN: 14364522     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Allert, H., Dhraief, H., & Nejdl, W. (2002). How are learning objects used in learning processes. Instructional roles of learning objects in LOM. In Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2002. Denver, USA.
2. Anido, L. E., Fernández, M. J., Caeiro, M., Santos, J. M., Rodríguez, J. S., & Llamas, M. (2002). Educational metadata and brokerage for learning resources. Computers & Education, 38(2002), 351-374.
3. Barritt, C., & Lewis, D. (2000). Reusable learning object strategy - definition, creation process, and guidelines building. Retrieved November 12, 2001, from http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/elearning/implement/ rlo_strategy_v3-1.pdf
4. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The semantic web. Scientific American, 284(5), 34-43.
5. Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1999). Contextual design. ACM Interactions, 6(1), 30-42.
6. Bieber, M., Engelbart, D., Furuta, R., Hiltz, S. R., John, N., Preece, J., et al. (2002). Toward virtual community knowledge evolution. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(4), 11-35.
7. Brantner, S., Enzi, T., Guth, S., Neumann, G., & Simon, B. (2001). UNIVERSAL - Design and implementation of a highly flexible e-market place of learning resources. In R. Hartley, Kinshuk, T. Okamoto & J. P. Klus (Eds.), Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 215-218). Madison, USA: IEEE Computer Society.
8. (2002). Dublin core metadata initiative. Retrieved October 4, 2003, from http://dublincore.org/
9. Duval, E., Forte, E., Cardinaels, K., Verhoeven, B., Van Durm, R., Hendrix, K., et al. (2001). The Ariadne knowledge pool system. Communications of the ACM, 44(5), 73-78.
10. Duval, E., Hodgins, W., Sutton, S. A., & Weibel, S. L. (2002). Metadata principles and practicalities. D-Lib Magazine, 8(4), retrieved October 4, 2003, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april02/weibel/04weibel.html
11. Duval, E., & Hodgins, W. (2003). A LOM research agenda. In Proceedings of the 12th World Wide Web Conference. Budapest.
12. EducaNext. (2003). EducaNext: A service for knowledge sharing. Retrieved October 4, 2003, from http://www.educanext.org/whitepaper.pdf
13. El Saddik, A., Fischer, S., & Steinmetz, R. (2001). Reusable multimedia content in web-based learning systems. IEEE Multimedia, 8(3), 30-38.
14. Farance, F. (2003). IEEE LOM standard not yet ready for "prime time". Learning Technology Newsletter, 5(1).
15. Friesen, N., Roberts, A., & Fisher, S. (2002). CanCore: metadata for learning objects. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 28(3), 43-53.
16. Garrido, J. S. (2003). Two scenarios using metadata. Learning Technology Newsletter, 5(1).
17. Guth, S., Neumann, G., & Simon, B. (2001). UNIVERSAL - Design spaces for learning media. In R. H. Sprague (Ed.), Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Maui, USA: IEEE.
18. Hämäläinen, M., Whinston, A. B., & Vishik, S. (1996). Electronic markets for learning: education brokerage on the internet. Communications of the ACM, 39(6), 51-58.
19. Hatala, M., & Richards, G. (2002). Global vs. community metadata standards: Empowering users for knowledge exchange. In Proceedings of the 1st International Semantic Web Conference (pp. 292-306). Sardinia: Springer, LNCS 2342.
20. Hermans, H. J. H., Koper, E. J. R., Loeffen, A., Manderveld, J. M., & Rusman, E. M. (2000). Reference manual for Edubox-EML/XML binding 1.0/1.0 (Beta version). Heerlen: Open University of the Netherlands.
21. IEEE. (2002). Draft 6.4 of the Learning Object Metadata (LOM). Piscataway, USA: IEEE, retrieved March 15, 2002, from http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/index.html
22. Ip, A., Morrison, I., & Currie, M. (2001). What is a learning object, technically? In Proceedings of WebNet 2001. Orlando, USA.
23. Koper, R., Olivier, B., & Anderson, T. (2003). IMS learning design information model. Retrieved October 4, 2003, from http://www.imsproject.org/learningdesign/index.cfm
24. Lamminaho, V., & Magerkurth, S. (2001). Unifying descriptions of higher education courses across Europe - Metadata specification in the CUBER Project. In Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Open Learning and Distance Education. Düsseldorf, Germany.
25. Nejdl, W., Wolf, B., Qu, C., Decker, S., Sintek, M., Ambjörn, N., Nilsson, M., Palmer, M., Risch, T. (2002). Edutella: A P2P networking infrastructure based on RDF. In Proceedings of the 11th International World Wide Web Conference. Hawaii, USA.
26. Nilsson, M., Palmér, M., & Naeve, A. (2002). Semantic web metadata for e-learning - Some architectural guidelines. In Proceedings of the 11th International World Wide Web Conference. Hawaii, USA.
27. Paquette, G., & Rosca, I. (2002). Organic aggregation of knowledge objects in educational systems. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 28(3), 11-26.
28. Pawlowski, J. M., & Adelsberger, H. (2002). Electronic business and education. In H. Adelsberger, B. Collis & J. M. Pawlowski (Eds.), Handbook on Information Technologies for Education and Training (pp. 653-670). Berlin: Springer.
29. Richards, G. (2002). Editorial: The challenges of the learning object paradigm. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 28(3), 3-9.
30. Simon, B., & Brantner, S. (2003). System interface framework for building educational brokerage networks. Vienna, Graz. Retrieved October 4, 2003, from http://nm.wu-wien.ac.at/e-learning/interoperability/
31. Simon, B., Haghirian, P., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (2002). Case study teaching via collaborative information technology. In S. Wrycza (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Information Systems. Gdanks, Poland.
32. Simon, B., Miklós, Z., Sintek, M., & Salvachua, J. (2003). Smart space for learning: A mediation infrastructure for learning services. In Proceedings of the 12th World Wide Web Conference. Budapest.
33. Simon, B., & Quemada, J. (2002). A critical reflection of metadata standards based on usage scenarios. In G. Bachmann, O. Haefeli & M. Kindt (Eds.), Campus 2002: Die virtuelle Hochschule in der Konsolidierungsphase. Münster: Waxmann.
34. Simon, B., Retalis, S., & Brantner, S. (2003). Building interoperability among learning content management systems. In Proceedings of the 12th World Wide Web Conference. Budapest.
35. Suthers, D. D. (2001). Evaluating the learning object metadata for K-12 educational resources. In T. Okamoto, R. Hartley, Kinshuk & J. P. Klus (Eds.), Advanced Learning Technologies - Issues, Achievements, and Challenges (pp. 371-374). Madison: IEEE Computer Society.
36. Sutton, S. A. (1998). Gateway to Educational Materials (GEM): Metadata for networked information discovery and retrieval. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30, 691-693.
37. Synytsya, K. (2003). Learning object metadata: Implementations and open issues - Introduction to the special issue. Learning Technology Newsletter, 5(1).
38. Wiederhold, G. (1992). Mediators in the architecture of future information systems. IEEE Computer, 25(2), 38-49.
39. Wiley, D. A. (2001). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In D. A. Wiley (Ed.), The Instructional Use of Learning Objects. Retrieved November 11, 2001, from http://reusability.org/read/