Less is more in distance education. The contradictory relationship between rapid adoption and radical innovation

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 105-115

  Svensson, Lars ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY WEST   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Adoption; Diffusion; Innovation; Learning technologies; Technological frames

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042637610     PISSN: 14364522     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Atkins, N. E, & Vasu, E. S. (2000). Measuring Knowledge of Technology Usage and Stages of Concern About Computing. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8 (4), 279-302.
2. Bannon, L. J. (1995). Issues in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. In C. O'Malley (Ed.) Computer supported collaborative learning, New York: Springer-Verlag, 267-281.
3. Berg, G. A. (2000). Towards a learning theory for Educational Technology. Webnet Journal, 2 (1), 5-6.
4. Braa, K., Sørensen, C., & Dahlbom, B. (2000). The Planet Internet: Challenges Facing Informatics, Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
5. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a unified view of Working, Learning and Innovation. Organization Science, 2 (1), 40-57.
6. Ciborra, C. (2000). Drifting: From Control to Drift. In K. Braa, C. Sørensen & B. Dahlbom (Eds.) Planet Internet, Challenges Facing Informatics, Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur, 185-196.
7. Dahlbom, B., & Mathiassen, L. (1993). Computers in Context: Philosophy and Practice of Systems Design, Cambridge: Blackwell.
8. Farenga, S. J., & Joyce, B. A. (2001). Hardware versus Brainware: Where are Technology Dollars Being Invested? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9 (3), 313-319.
9. Fjuk, A. (1998). Computer Support for Distributed Collaborative Learning, Exploring a Complex Problem Area, Dr. Scient. Thesis 5, University of Oslo, Norway.
10. Gilbert, L. (1999). Some Valuable Lessons from the Teaching and Learning Technology Programme in the UK. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 10 (1), 67-85.
11. Giroux, S., Hotte, R., & Dao, K. (2000). Towards Adaptivity and Agility A Fractal view on Learning Environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research , 11 (3/4), 333-353.
12. Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social Presence Theory and Implications for Interaction and Collaborative Learning in Computer Conferences. International Journal of Telecommunications, 1 (2/3), 147-166.
13. Hara, N., & Kling, R. (1999). Students' Frustration with a web based distance education course. First Monday, http://firstmonday.org.
14. Henfridsson, O. (1999). IT-adaptation as sensemaking, Inventing new meaning for technology in organizations, Dr. Thesis, Department of Informatics, Umeå University, Sweden.
15. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Limayem, M., & Hirt, S. G. (2000). Internet-Based Teaching: How to Encourage University Students to Adopt Advanced Internet-Based Technologies? In R. H. Sprague Jr. (Ed.) Proceedings of the Thirty-third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, CD-ROM, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
17. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1984). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.) The experience of Learning, Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
18. Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behaviour, New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Moore, M. G. (1993). Three types of interaction. In K. Harry, M. John & D. Keegan (Eds.) Distance Education: New Perspectives, New York: Routledge, 12-24.
20. Motiwalla, L., & Tello, S. (2000). Distance Learning On the Internet: An Exploratory Study. The Internet and Higher Education, 2 (4), 253-264.
21. Nuldén, U. (1999). e-ducation, Gothenburg Studies in Informatics, Report 15, Doctoral thesis, Gothenburg University, Sweden.
22. Orlikowski, W. J. (1993). Learning from Notes: Organizational Issues in Groupware Implementation. Information Society, 9 (3), 237-250.
23. Orlikowski, W. (1996). Evolving with Notes, Organisational Change around Groupware Technology. In C. U. Ciborra (Eds.) Groupware & Teamwork, Chichester: John Wiley.
24. Orlikowski, W., & Gash, D. (1994). Technological Frames: Making Sense of Information Technology in Organizations. Transactions on Information Systems, 12 (2), 174-207.
25. Orlikowski, W., Yates, J., Okamura, K., & Fujimoto, M. (1995). Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use. Organisation Science, 6, 423-444.
26. Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education, London: Routledge.
27. Robertson, M., Sorensen, C., & Swan, J. (2001). The Survival of the leanest: Intensive knowledge work and groupware adaptation. Information Technology and People, 14 (4), 334-353.
28. Silverstone, R., & Haddon, L. (1996). Design and the Domestication of Information and Communication Technologies - Technical Change and Everyday Life. In Mansell, R. & Silverstone, R. (Eds.) Communication by Design: The Politics of Information and Communication Technologies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 44-74.
29. Stahl, G. (2002). Rediscovering CSCL. In G. Stahl (Ed.) Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2002), CD-ROM, Univ. Colorado Boulder, USA.
30. Svensson, L. (2002a). Interaction Repertoire in a Learning Community. In G. Stahl (Ed.) Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2002), CD-ROM, Univ. Colorado Boulder, USA.
31. Svensson, L. (2002b). Discursive Evaluation in a Distributed Learning Community. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 18 (3), 308-322.
32. Svensson, L., & Sørensen, C. (2002). Designing Community Atmosphere Barometers. In S. Wrycza (Ed.) Proceedings of ECIS 2002, Poland: University of Gdansk, 1353-1361.
33. Voß, A., Procter, R., & Williams, R. (2000). Innovation in Use: Interleaving day-to-day operation and systems development. Paper presented at the Participatory Design Conference, November 28 - December 1, 2000, New York, USA.
34. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations, CA: Sage Publications.
35. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity, New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Williams, D. L. (2001). The Virtual Classroom in Relation to Educational Models. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7 (1), 23-32.
37. Wolcott, L. L. (1995). The Distance Teacher as Reflective Practitioner. Educational Technology, Jan-Feb, 39-43.