The development of a multi-media portfolio for enhancing learning and assessment in a K-8 science methods class

Journal of Science Teacher Education

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 335-344

  Glasson, George E ^a   McKenzie, Woodrow L ^b  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LYNCHBURG COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042620770     PISSN: 1046560X     EISSN: 15731847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1009470928837     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Barrett, H. C. (1994). Technology-Supported Assessment Portfolios. The Computing Teacher, 21(6), 9-12.
2. Bonk, C.J., Medary, P.V., & Reynolds, T.H. (1994). Cooperative hypermedia: The marriage of collaborative writing and mediated environments. In Reed, W.M., Burton, J.K, & Liu, M. (Ed.) Multimedia and megachange: New roles for educational computing. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
3. Champagne, A. B., & Newell, S. T. (1992). Directions for Research and Development: Alternative Methods of Assessing Scientific Literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(8), 841-860.
4. Collins, A. (1991b). Portfolios for assessing student learning in science: A new name for a familiar idea. In G. Klum & S.M. Malcom (Eds.), Science assessment in the service of reform (pp. 291-300). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
5. Dana, T.M., Lorsbach, A.W., Hook., & Briscoe, C. (1991). Students showing what they know: A look at alternative assessment. In G. Klum & S.M. Malcom (Eds.), Science assessment in the service of reform (pp. 331-337). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
6. D'Ignazio, F. (1994). The Classroom as Knowledge Theme Park. The Computing Teacher, 21(7), 35-37.
7. Ferry, B. (1996). Probing understanding: The use of a computer-based tool to help preservice teachers map concepts. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 7(4), 283-293.
8. Glasson, G. E. & Lalik, R. V. (1993). Reinterpreting the learning cycle from a social constructivist perspective: A qualitative study of teachers' beliefs and practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2), 187-207.
9. Keys, C. W. & Golley, P. S. (1996). The power of a partner: Using collaborative reflection to support constructivist practice in middle grades science and mathematics. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 7(4) 229, 246.
10. Kuhn, G. & Stuessy, C. (1991). Assessment in science and mathematics education reform. In G. Klum & S.M. Malcom (Eds.), Science assessment in the service of reform (pp. 71-87). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
11. Murphy, N. (1994). Helping preservice teachers master authentic assessment for the learning cycle model. In L.E. Schafer (Ed.), Behind the methods class door: Educating elementary and middle school science teachers. Columbus, OH: Eric Clearinghouse for Science Mathematics and Environmental Education.
12. O'Brien, G. E. & Korth, W. (1991). Videotaping: A tool for enhancing the teacher's understanding of cognitive science and teacher self-development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2(4), 90-93.
13. Shymansky, J. A. & Kyle, W.C. (1992). Establishing a research agenda: Critical issues of science curriculum reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(8), 749-778.
14. Western Regional Environmental Education Council. (1992). Aquatic Wild. Boulder, CO: Author.
15. Wiggins, G. (1993). Assessment: authenticity, context, and validity. Phi Delta Kappan, 75, 200-214.