Avoiding holes in holistic evaluation

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 75-84

  Shaw, Malcolm ^a   Corazzi, Suzanne ^a  

^a LEEDS METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Holistic evaluation; Organisation management of evaluation; Project evaluation; Triangulation in evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042618968     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Breen, R., Jenkins, A., Lindsay, R. & Smith, P. (1998). Insights through Triangulation. In Oliver, M. (Ed.) Innovation in the Evaluation of Learning Technology. London: University of North London, 151-168.
2. INUSE (1996). http://www.npl.co.uk/inuse (information on usability standards and design now found at http://www.usability.serco.com/).
3. Johnson, P. (1992). Human Computer Interaction: psychology, task analysis, and software, Maidenhead: McGraw Hill.
4. Oliver, M. & Conole, G. (1998). The Evaluation of Learning Technology - an overview. In Oliver, M. (Ed.) Innovation in the Evaluation of Learning Technology. London: University of North London, 5-22.
5. Parlett, M. R. & Hamilton, D. F. (1972). Evaluation as Illumination, Occasional paper No. 9, Edinburgh, UK: University of Edinburgh, Centre for Research in Educational Sciences.
6. Pawson, R. & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic Evaluation, London: Sage.
7. Ravden, S. J & Johnson, G. I. (1989). Evaluating Usability of Human-Computer Interfaces - a Practical Method, Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
8. Tessmer, M. (1993). Planning and Conducting Formative Evaluations, London: Kogan Page.
9. Thorpe, M. (1993). Evaluating Open and Distance Learning, Harlow: Longman.