Propelling young women into the cyber age: Gender considerations in the evaluation of web-based information

School Library Media Research

Volumn 4, Issue , 2001, Pages

  Agosto, Denise E ^a  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042618961     PISSN: 15234320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Agosto, D. E. 2001. Sound, color, and action: Young people's evaluation of world wide Web sites. Unpublished Ph.d. diss., Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick.
2. American Association of University Women. 1999. Gender gaps: Where schools still fail our children. New York: Marlowe.
3. Brunner, C., D. Bennett, and M. Honey. 1998. Girl games and technological desire. In From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and computer games, ed. J. Cassell and H. Jenkins. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Pr., 72-88.
4. Burdick, T. A. 1996. Success and diversity in information seeking: Gender and the information search styles model. School Library Media Quarterly 25: 19-27.
5. Cassell, J. and H. Jenkins. 1998. Chess for girls? Feminism and computer games. In From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and computer games, ed. J. Cassell and H. Jenkins. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Pr., 2-45.
6. Comber, C., A. Colley, and D. J. Hargreaves. 1997. The effects of age, gender, and computer experience upon computer attitudes. Educational Research 39: 123-133.
7. DeRemer, M. 1989. The computer gender gap in elementary school. Computers in the schools 6: 39-49.
8. Dorman, S. M. 1998. Technology and the gender gap. The Journal of School Health 68: 165-166.
9. Druin, A. 1999. Beginning a discussion about kids, technology, and design. In The design of children's technology, ed. A. Druin. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, xiii-xxiii.
10. Fidel, R., R. K. Davies, M. H. Douglass, J. K. Holder, C. J. Hopkins, E. J. Kushner, B. K. Miyagishima, and C. D. Toney. 1999. A visit to the information mall: Web searching behavior of high school students. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50: 24-37.
11. Frey, J. H. 1991. The group interview in social research. Social Science Journal 28: 175-187.
12. Gorriz, C. M. and C. Medina. 2000. Engaging girls with computers through software games.Communications of the ACM 43: 42-49.
13. Gross, M. 1999. Imposed queries in the school library media center: A descriptive study. Library and Information Science Research 21(4): 501-521.
14. Gross, M. 1997. Pilot study on the prevalence of imposed queries in a school library media center. School Library Media Quarterly 25: 157-166.
15. Harding, S. G. 1991. Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University.
16. Honey, M., B. Moeller, C. Brunner, D. Bennett, P. Clements, and J. Hawkins. 1991. Girls and design: Exploring the question of technological imagination. Center for Technology in Education Technical Report No. 17, 1-12.
17. Kafai, Y. and M. J. Bates. 1997. Internet web-searching instruction in the elementary classroom: Building a foundation for information literacy. School Library Media Quarterly 25: 103-111.
18. Lage, M. J. and M. Treglia. 1998. Gender and active learning. In Teaching economics to undergraduates: Alternatives to chalk and talk, ed. W. E. Becker and M. Watts. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar, 35-480.
19. Laurel, B. 1990. Introduction. In The art of human-computer interface design, ed. B. Laurel. Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley, 1-12.
20. Martin, S. 1998. Internet use in the classroom: The impact of gender. Social Science Computer Review 16: 411-418.
21. Mayberry, M. 1999. Reproductive and resistant pedagogies: The comparative roles of collaborative learning and feminist pedagogy in science education. In Meeting the challenge: Innovative feminist pedagogies in action, ed. M. Mayberry and E. C. Rose. London: Routledge, 2-22.
22. Miles, M. B. and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2d ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
23. Miller, L., M. Chaika, and L. Groppe. 1996. Girls' preferences in software design: Insights from a focus group. Interpersonal computing and technology: An electronic journal for the twenty-first century, 4: 27-36. Accessed February 19, 2000, www.helsinki.fi/science/optek/1996/n2/miller.txt.
24. Opie, C. 1998. Whose turn next? Gender issues in information technology. In Gender in the secondary curriculum: Balancing the books, ed. A. Clark and E. Millard. London: Routledge, 80-95.
25. Roychoudhury, A., D. Tippins, and K. Scantlebury. 1995. Gender-inclusive science teaching: A feminist-constructivist approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32: 897-924.
26. Scaife, J. 1998. Science education for all? Towards more equitable science education. In Gender in the secondary curriculum: Balancing the books, ed. A. Clark and E. Millard. London: Routledge, 60-79.
27. Schofield, J. W. 1995. Computers and classroom culture. New York: Cambridge.
28. Seidman, I. E. 1991. Interviewing as qualitative research. New York: Columbia Teachers College.
29. Seymour, E. and N. M. Hewitt. 1997. Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.
30. Subrahmanyam, K. and P. M. Greenfield. 1998. Computer games for girls: What makes them play? In From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and computer games, ed. J. Cassell and H. Jenkins. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 46-71.
31. Turkle, S. 1988. Computational reticence: Why women fear the intimate machine. In Technology and women's voices: Keeping in touch, ed. C. Kramarae. New York: Routledge, 41-61.
32. Walford, G. 1981. Do chemistry textbooks present a sex-biased image? Education in Chemistry 18, no. 1 : 1.
33. Wester, F. 1996. The analysis of qualitative interviews. In The deliberate dialogue, ed. I. Maso and F. Wester. Brussels: VUB University Pr.
34. Wolcott, M. S. 1998. Information seeking and the world wide web: A qualitative study of seventh grade students' search behavior during an inquiry activity. Unpublished Ph.d. diss., University of San Francisco.