Animal model research: The apples and oranges quandary

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals

Volumn 32, Issue SUPPL. 1B, 2004, Pages 405-409

  Shapiro, Kenneth J ^a  

^a Psychologists Ethical Treatm Anim   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal models; Evaluation; Validation

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL WELFARE; CONFERENCE PAPER; HUMAN VERSUS ANIMAL COMPARISON; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 3042616214     PISSN: 02611929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/026119290403201s66     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. Shapiro, K.J. (2000). Evaluation of animal model research. In Progress in the Reduction, Refinement, and Replacement of Animal Experimentation (ed. M. Balls, A-M. van Zeller & M.E. Halder), pp. 1541-1551. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V.
2. Dagg, A.I. (1999). Responsible animal-based research: three "Flags" to consider. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 2, 337-346.
3. Shapiro, K.J. (1998). Animal Models of Human Psychology: Critique of Science, Ethics, and Policy, 328pp. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe and Huber.
4. Singer, P. (1975). Animal Liberation: A New Ethic for our Treatment of Animals, 297pp. New York, USA: Avon.
5. American Medical Association (March 1988). Use of Animals in Biomedical Research: The Challenge and Response. Washington, DC, USA: Author.
6. LaFollette H. & Shanks, N. (1996). Brute Science, 286pp. London, UK: Routledge.
7. Dagg, A.I. (2000). Animal experimentation in cancer research: a citation analysis. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 3, 239-251.