Longitudinal efficacy comparisons of three levels of developmentally appropriate practice for former head start children

Current Issues in Education

Volumn 3, Issue , 2000, Pages

  Stafford, Mary E ^a   Van Rensburg, Polly Whitman ^b,d,e   Greene, Andrea ^a,c,f  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Scottsdale Public Schools ^*  (United States)

^c Mesa Community College   (United States)

^d Scottsdale Public Schools   (United States)

^e Morrison Institute   (United States)

^f Arizona Hd Start Pub Sch T   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042605195     PISSN: 1099839X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abbott-Shim, M., & Sibley, A. (1992). Assessment profile for early childhood programs: Research manual. Atlanta, GA: Quality Assist, Inc.
2. Aldridge, J. (1992). Issues in developmentally appropriate practice and individual differences. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 19, 71-78.
3. Bredekamp, S. (Ed). (1987). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (Expanded ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
4. Bredekamp, S. (1993). Myths about developmentally appropriate practice: A response to Fowell and Lawton. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 8, 117-119.
5. Bredekamp, S., & Copple, C. (Eds.). (1997). Developmentally appropriate practice for early childhood programs (Revised ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
6. Bredekamp, S., & Rosegrant, T. (Eds.). (1992). Reaching potentials: Appropriate curriculum and assessment for young children (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
7. Burts, D.C., Hart, C.H., Charlesworth, R., DeWolf, D. M., Ray, J., Manuel, K., & Fleege, P.O. (1993). Developmental appropriateness of kindergarten programs and academic outcomes in first grade. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 8, 23-31.
8. Charlesworth, R., Hart, C.H., Burts, D.C., & DeWolf, M. (1993). The LSU studies: Building a research base for developmentally appropriate practice. Advances in Early Education and Day Care, 5, 3-28.
9. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Free Press.
10. Dewey, J. (1956). The child and the curriculum. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1902).
11. Doyle, W. J., Hancock, G., & Kifer, E. (1972). Teachers' perceptions: Do they make a difference? Journal of the Association for the Study of Perception, 7(2), 21-30.
12. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
13. Elkind, D. (1989). Developmentally appropriate practice: Philosophical and practical implications. Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 113-117.
14. Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development. (1994). The teacher training project: Study of the implementation of developmentally appropriate practice in classrooms and schools. Final report. San Francisco, CA: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 379 085).
15. Fowell, N., & Lawton, J. (1992). An alternative view of appropriate practice in early childhood education. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 7, 53-73.
16. Fowell, N., & Lawton, J. (1993). Beyond polar descriptions of developmentally appropriate practice: A reply to Bredekamp. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 8, 121-124.
17. Galen, H. (1994). Developmentally appropriate practice: Myths and facts. Principal, 73 (5), 20-22.
18. Gestwicki, C. (1995). Developmentally appropriate practice: Curriculum and development in early education. Albany, NY: Delmar Publishers.
19. Greene, A., Mulholland, L., & Ahern, P. W. (1994). Head Start goes to school: 1993-94 evaluation report. (Morrison Institute for Public Policy). Phoenix, AZ: Southwest Human Development, Inc.
20. Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). Social skills rating system manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
21. Johnson, J. E., & Johnson, K. M. (1992). Clarifying the developmental perspective in response to Carta, Schwartz, Atwater, and McConnell. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 439-457.
22. Kessler, S. A. (1991). Alternative perspectives on early childhood education. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 6, 183-197.
23. National Association for the Education of Young Children. (1987). Standardized testing of young children 3 through 8 years of age: Summary of NAEYC position statement. [On-line]. Available: http://www.america-tomorrow.com/naeyc/position/pstestin.htm.
24. Piaget, J. (1959). The language and thought of the child. In M. Gabain (Trans.), The language and thought of the child by Jean Piaget. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd. (Original work published 1926)
25. Rieber, R. W., & Wollock, J. (Eds.), Van Der Veer, R. (Trans.). (1997). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Volume 3, Problems of the theory and history of psychology. NY: Plenum Press.
26. Schweinhart, L. J. (1993). Observing young children in action: The key to early childhood assessment. Young Children, 48 (5), 29-33.
27. Sweet, A. P., & Guthrie, J. T. (1994). Teacher perceptions of students' motivation to read. (Reading Research Report No. 29). Athens, GA: National Reading Research Center; College Park, MD: National Reading Research Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 378563)
28. Teale, W. H. (1988). Developmentally appropriate assessment of reading and writing in the early childhood classroom. The Elementary School Journal, 89, 172-183.
29. Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and word. In E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar (Eds. and Trans.), Thought and language. Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press. (Original work published in 1934).
30. Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised. Chicago, IL: The Riverside Publishing Co.