Immediate endometrial resection for menorrhagia was more effective in the long term than initial medical management

Evidence-based Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 126-127

  Cooper, K G ^b   Jack, S A ^b   Parkin, D E ^b   Grant, A M ^b   Abbott, Jason ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEVONORGESTREL;

ADULT; AMENORRHEA; CLINICAL TRIAL; DISEASE SEVERITY; ENDOMETRIUM; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MENORRHAGIA; METRORRHAGIA; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SHORT SURVEY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM; UTERUS SURGERY;

EID: 3042594490     PISSN: 1361259X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/ebog.2002.0068     Document Type: Short Survey

References (3)

1. Coulter A, Peto V, Jenkinson C. Quality of life and patient satisfaction following treatment for menorrhagia. Fam Pract 1994; 11: 394-401.
2. Overton C, Hargreaves J, Maresh M. A national survey of the complications of endometrial destruction for menstrual disorders: the MISTLETOE study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 1351-1359.
3. Garry R. Evidence and techniques in endometrial ablation: consensus. Gynecol Endoscopy 2002; 11: 5-17