Predictive models of safety belt use: A regression analysis of MVOSS data

Traffic Injury Prevention

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 137-143

  Chaudhary, Neil K ^a,b   Northrup, Veronika Shabanova ^a  

^a Preusser Research Group Inc   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Demography; Regression Analysis; Safety Belts

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; DEMOGRAPHY; DRIVING ABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAW; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MALE; MARRIAGE; MODEL; POPULATION DENSITY; PREDICTION; SEATBELT; SOCIOECONOMICS; TRAFFIC SAFETY; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SAFETY; SEAT BELTS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 3042590005     PISSN: 15389588     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15389580490435123     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Block A. (November 2001a) 2000 Motor Vehicle Occupant Safety Survey, Volume 1: Methods, NHTSA Technical Report, DOT HS 809 389.
2. Block A. (November 2001b) 2000 Motor Vehicle Occupant Safety Survey, Volume 2: Seat Belt Report, NHTSA Technical Report, DOT HS 809 389.
3. Calisir F, Lehto MR. (2002) Young drivers' decision making and safety belt use, Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 34, pp. 793-805.
4. Chaudhary NK, Solomon MG, Cosgrove LA. (in press) The relationship between perceived risk of being ticketed on self-reported seat belt use. Journal of Safety Research.
5. Eby DW, Vivoda JM, Fordyce TA. (2002) The effects of standard enforcement on Michigan safety belt use. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 34, pp. 815-823.
6. Geary L. (2003) 2002 Seat Belt Use in Connecticut. Connecticut Department of Transportation Division of Highway Safety. Under Review.
7. Glassbrenner D. (May 2003) Safety Belt Use in 2002-US Rates in States and Territories. NHTSA Research Note, DOT HS 809 587.
8. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. (IIHS; January 2003) Status Report 38 (1).
9. NHTSA. (2001) Occupant Safety. NHTSA Traffic Safety Facts 2001, DOT HS 809 474.
10. Ola S, Baruch F, MacGregor D. (1985) Perceived driving safety and seatbelt usage, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 17(2), pp. 119-133.
11. Preusser DF, Williams AF, Lund AK. (1991) Characteristics of belted and unbelted drivers, Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 23, pp. 475-482.
12. Shin D, Hong L, Waldron I. (1999) Possible causes of socioeconomic and ethnic differences in seat belt use among high school students, Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 31, pp. 485-496.
13. Stasson M, Fishbein M. (1990) The relation between perceived risk and preventive action: A within-subject analysis of perceived driving risk and intentions to wear seatbelts, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 20(19-1), pp. 1541-1557.
14. Ulmer RG, Preusser DF, Preusser CW, Cosgrove LA. (1995) Evaluation of California's safety belt law change from secondary to primary enforcement, Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 26, pp. 213-220.