An acquisitional view on optionality

Lingua

Volumn 114, Issue 9-10, 2004, Pages 1133-1146

  van Kampen, Jacqueline ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Acquisition; Blocking; Dutch; Learnability; Long reflexives; Optionality; Pied piping

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042588004     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2003.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Chomsky N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris, Dordrecht.
2. Clahsen H. Constraints on parameter setting a grammatical analysis of some acquisition stages in German child language Lang. Acquisit. 1.4 1991 361-391
3. Corver N.F.M. 1990. The Syntax of Left-Branch Extractions. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Tilburg.
4. DiScullio A.-M. Williams E. 1987. On the Definition of Word. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Everaert M. 1986. The Syntax of Reflexivization. Foris, Dordrecht.
6. Evers A. 1988. Morphology Class Lectures.
7. Evers A. Kampen J. van 2001. E-language, I-language and the order of parameter setting. Submitted paper. http://www.let.uu.nl/~Jacqueline.vanKampen/personal/downloadables.htm.
8. Grimshaw J. 2000. Extended projection and locality. In: Coopmans, P., Everaert, M., Grimshaw, J. (Eds.), Lexical Specification and Insertion. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. 115-133.
9. Hoekstra T. Hyams N. 1995. The syntax and interpretation of dropped categories in child language: a unified account. In: Camacho, J., Choueiri, L., Watanabe, M. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL). CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 123-136.
10. Hoekstra T. Jordens P. 1994. From adjunct to head. In: Hoekstra, T., Schwartz, B.D. (Eds.), Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. 119-149.
11. Kampen J. van 1992. Underspecification of functional features. The acquisition of root wh-questions in Dutch and English', in: Paper Presented at the Boston University Conference on Language Development, 23-27 October, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
12. Kampen J. van 1994. The learnability of the Left Branch Condition. In: Bok-Bennema, R., Cremers, C. (Eds.), Linguistics in The Netherlands. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. 83-94.
13. Kampen J. van 1996. PF/LF convergence in acquisition. In: Kusumoto, K. (Ed.), Proceedings of NELS 26, 23-27 October 1995, pp. 149-163.
14. Kampen, J. van 1997. First Steps in Wh-movement. Eburon, Delft.
15. Kampen J. van 2000. Left-branch extraction as operator movement. In: Powers, S.M., Hamann, C. (Eds.), The Acquisition of Scrambling and Cliticization. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 479-503.
16. Kroch A. Reflexes of grammar patterns of language change J. Lang. Variat. Change 1.3 1989 199-244
17. Lebeaux D. 1988. Language Acquisition and the Form of Grammar. Ph.D. Dissertation University of Massachusetts.
18. Lightfoot D. 1999. The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change and Evolution. Blackwell, Malden, MA.
19. Mathieu E. 2002. Split DP syntax and dethematized nominals: a view on the syntax-discourse interface. Ms. University College London.
20. Reinhart T. Reuland E.Reflexivity Linguistic Inquiry 24 1993 657-720
21. Reuland E. Primitives of Binding Linguistic Inquiry 32 2001 439-492
22. Roeper T.Universal bilingualism Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2 3 1999 169-186
23. Ross J.R. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.
24. Rothstein S. 1983. The Syntactic Forms of Predication. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.
25. Williams E. Blocking and anaphora Linguistic Inquiry 28-4 1997 577-628
26. Yang Ch. 2002. Knowledge and Variation in Natural Language. Oxford University Press, Oxford.