Elective cesarean delivery

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 103, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1135-1136

  Queenan, John T ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CESAREAN SECTION; DECISION MAKING; EDITORIAL; ELECTIVE SURGERY; MEDICAL ETHICS; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; TREATMENT INDICATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; NOTE; PREGNANCY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

CESAREAN SECTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, ELECTIVE;

EID: 3042580358     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000128268.04368.1c     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. Harer WB. Quo vadis cesarean delivery? Obstet Gynecol Surv 2002;57:61-4.
2. Minkoff H, Chervenak FA. Elective primary cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2003;348:946-50.
3. Nygaard I, Cruikshank DP. Should all women be offered elective cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:217-9.
4. Belizan JM, Althabe F, Barros FC, Alexander S. Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study. BMJ 1999;319:1397-400.
5. Surgery and patient choice: the ethics of decision making. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 289. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102:1101-6.
6. Kalish RB, McCullough L, Gupta M, Thaler HT, Chervenak FA. Intrapartum elective cesarean delivery: a previously unrecognized clinical entity. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103:1137-41.