Research utilization and the impact of health promotion policy

Sozial- und Praventivmedizin

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 185-197

  von Lengerke, Thomas ^a   Rutten, Alfred ^b   Vinck, Jan ^c   Abel, Thomas ^d   Kannas, Lasse ^e   Lüschen, Günther ^f   Rodríguez Diaz, Josep A ^g   van der Zee, Jouke ^h  

^a INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^c HASSELT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^h NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Health policy models; Health promotion; Policy impact; Public health; Research utilization; Science policy relationship

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY; BELGIUM; BREAST CANCER; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; EUROPE; FINLAND; GERMANY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NETHERLANDS; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SMOKING CESSATION; SOCIAL ASPECT; SPAIN; SWITZERLAND; WORK ENVIRONMENT;

CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; EUROPE; FORECASTING; HEALTH PLAN IMPLEMENTATION; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; RESEARCH;

EID: 3042579796     PISSN: 03038408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00038-004-3110-2     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Alwin DF, Braun M, Harkness J, Scott J (1994). Measurement in multi-national surveys. In: Borg I, Mohler PP, eds. Trends and perspectives in empirical social research. Berlin: de Gruyter: 26-39.
2. Atwood K, Colditz GA, Kawachi I (1997). From public health science to prevention policy: placing science in its social and political contexts. Am J Public Health 87: 1603-6.
3. Babbie E (1992). The practice of social research. 6th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth.
4. Berridge V, Stanton J (1999). Science and policy: historical insights. Soc Sci Med 49: 1133-8.
5. Bryant T (2002). Role of knowledge in public health and health promotion policy change. Health Promotion Int 17: 89-98.
6. Caplan N, Morrison A, Stambaugh RJ (1975). The use of social science knowledge in policy decisions at the national level. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.
7. Dexter LA (1970). Elite and specialized interviewing. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
8. Dillman DA (1978). Mail and telephone surveys. New York: Wiley.
9. Innvœr S, Vist G, Trommald M, Oxman A (2002). Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy 7: 239-44.
10. Habermas J (1968). Technik und Wissenschaft als "Ideologie". Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp [in German].
11. Habermas J (1971). Toward a rational society. London: Heineman.
12. Hoppe R (2002). Van flipperkast naar grensverkeer: veranderende visies op de relatie tussen wetenschap en beleid. The Hague: Adviesraad voor het Wetenschaps- en Technologiebeleid [in Dutch].
13. Lindblom CE (1968). The policy-making process. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
14. Richmond JB, Kotelchuck M (1983). Political influences: rethinking national health policy. In: McGuire CH, Foley RP, Gorr A, Richards RW, eds. Handbook of health professions education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass: 386-404.
15. Rütten A, Lüschen G, von Lengerke T, et al. (2000). Health promotion policy in Europe: rationality, impact, and evaluation. München: Oldenbourg.
16. Rütten A, Lüschen G, von Lengerke T, et al. (2003a). Determinants of health policy impact: a theoretical framework for policy analysis. Soz Praventiv Med 48: 293-300.
17. Rütten A, Lüschen G, von Lengerke T, et al. (2003b). Determinants of health policy impact: comparative results of a European policymaker study. Soz Praventiv Med 48: 379-91.
18. Sager F (2004). Verwaltung, Politik und Wissenschaft in der kantonalen Alkoholprävention. Soz Praventiv Med 49: 208-15 [in German].
19. Schneider Jamner M (2001). Introduction: new frontiers for research, practice, and policy. In: Schneider Jamner M, Stokols D, eds. Promoting human wellness: new frontiers for research, practice, and policy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press: 1-15.
20. von Lengerke T (2001). Health behaviour and health promotion in a public health psychology: theoretical issues and empirical findings. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.