Subnational determinants of national multipartism in Latin America

Legislative Studies Quarterly

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 179-201

  Moreno, Erika ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042571695     PISSN: 03629805     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3162/036298003x200854     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Ames, Barry. 1994. "The Reverse Coattails Effect: Local Party Organization in the 1989 Brazilian Election." American Political Science Review 88:95-111.
2. Ames, Barry. 1995. "Electoral Strategy under Open List Proportional Representation." American Journal of Political Science 39:406-33.
3. Archer, Ronald, and Matthew S. Shugart. 1997. "The Unrealized Potential of Presidential Dominance in Colombia." In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Scott Mainwaring and Matthew Soberg Shugart. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Campbell, James. 1991. "The Presidential Surge and its Midterm Decline in Congressional Elections, 1868-1988." Journal of Politics 53:477-87.
5. Campbell, James. 1997. The Presidential Pulse of Congressional Elections. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
6. Campbell, James, and Joe A. Sumner. 1990. "Presidential Coattails in Senate Elections." American Political Science Review 84:513-24.
7. Carey, John, and Matthew S. Shugart. 1995. "Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas." Electoral Studies 14:417-39.
8. Cohen, Jacob, and Patricia Cohen. 1983. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2d edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Cox, Gary. 1990. "Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems." American Journal of Political Science 34:903-35.
10. Cox, Gary. 1997, Making Votes Count: Strategic Cooperation in the World's Electoral Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Dietz, Henry, and Gil Shidlo. 1997. Urban Elections in Democratic Latin America. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.
12. Dixon, William J., and Stephen Gaardner. 1992. "Presidential Succession and the Cold War: An Analysis of Soviet-American Relations, 1948-1988." Journal of Politics 54:156-75.
13. Duverger, M. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Methuen.
14. Escobar-Lemmon, Maria C. 2000. Causes and Process of Decentralization in Latin America. Ph.D. diss. University of Arizona.
15. Gujarati, Damodar. 1978. Basic Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Grofman, Bernard, and Arend Lijphart, eds. 1986. Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences. New York: Agathon.
17. Hoskin, Gary. 1998. "Urban Electoral Behavior in Colombia." In Urban Elections in Democratic Latin America, ed. Henry Dietz and Gil Shidlo. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.
18. Inter American Development Bank. 1997. Economic and Social Progress in Latin America, 1997 Report: Latin America after a Decade of Reforms. Washington: Inter American Development Bank.
19. Jones, Mark. 1993. "The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws in Latin America and the Caribbean." Electoral Studies 12:59-75.
20. Jones, Mark. 1994. "Presidential Election Laws and Multipartism in Latin America." Political Research Quarterly 47:41-57.
21. Jones, Mark. 1995. Electoral Laws and the Survival of Presidential Democracies. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
22. Jones, Mark. 1997a. "Evaluating Argentina's Presidential Democracy, 1983-1995." In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Scott Mainwaring and Matthew S. Shugart. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Jones, Mark. 1997b. "Federalism and the Number of Parties in Argentine Congressional Elections." Journal of Politics 59:538-49.
24. Katz, R. 1980. A Theory of Parties and Electoral Systems. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
25. Keesings Contemporary Archives. London: Keesings Ltd.
26. Kennedy, Peter. 1998. A Guide to Econometrics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Laakso, M., and R. Taagepera. 1979. "Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe." Comparative Political Studies 12:3-27.
28. Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29. Lijphart, Arend. 1990. "The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws, 1945-1985." American Political Science Review 84:481-96.
30. Linz, Juan. 1994. "Presidential or Parlimentary Democracy: Does It Make a Difference?" In The Failure of Presidential Democracy, ed. Juan Linz and Arturo Valenzuela. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
31. Mainwaring, Scott. 1993. "Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination." Comparative Political Studies 26:198-228.
32. Mainwaring, Scott. 1997. Presidentialism in Brazil: The Impact of Strong Constitutional Powers, Weak Partisan Powers, and Robust Federalism. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center.
33. Mainwaring, Scott, and Matthew S. Shugart. 1997. "Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America: Rethinking the Terms of the Debate." In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Scott Mainwaring and Matthew S. Shugart. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Manglesdorf, Karen Ruffing. 1988. "Administrative Decentralization and Development: Some Conflicting Evidence from Ecuador." International Review of Administrative Sciences 54:67-88.
35. McDonald, Ronald. 1971. Party Systems and Elections in Latin America. Chicago, IL: Markham.
36. Moreno, Erika. 2001. Small Parties in Latin America. Ph.D. diss. University of Arizona.
37. Noblen, Dieter. 1993a. Enciclopedia Electoral Latinoamerican y del Caribe. San Jose, Costa Rica: Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos.
38. Nohlen, Dieter. 1993b. Los Sistemas Electorales en America Latino y el Debate sobre Reforma Electoral. Mexico: UNAM.
39. Ordeshook, Peter, and Olga Shvetsova. 1994. "Ethnic Heterogeneity, District Magnitude and the Number of Parties." American Journal of Political Science 38:100-23.
40. Piereson, James. 1975. "Presidential Popularity and Midterm Voting at Different Levels." American Journal of Political Science 19:683-94.
41. Rae, Douglas. 1967. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
42. Riker, William. R. 1986. "Duverger's Law Revisited." In Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences, ed. Bernard Grofman and Arend Lijphart, New York: Agathon.
43. Samuels, David. 2000. "The Gubernatorial Coattails Effect: Federalism and Congressional Elections in Brazil." Journal of Politics 62:240-53.
44. Sayrs, Lois. 1989. Pooled Time Series Analysis. Sage University Press Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills and London: Sage Publications.
45. Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1995. "The Electoral Cycle and Institutional Sources of Divided Presidential Government." American Political Science Review 89:327-43.
46. Shugart, Matthew S., and John Carey. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Simon, Dennis. 1984. "Presidents, Governors, and Electoral Accountability." Journal of Politics 51:286-304.
48. Simon, Dennis, Charles W. Ostrom, Jr., and Robert F. Marra. 1991. "The President, Refendum Voting, and Subnational Elections in the U.S." American Political Science Review 85:1177-92.
49. Stein, Robert. 1990. "Economic Voting for Governor and U.S. Senators: The Electoral Consequences of Federalism." Journal of Politics 52:29-53.
50. Taagepera, Rein. 1997. "Effective Number of Parties for Incomplete Data." Electoral Studies 16:145-51.
51. Taagepera, Rein, and Matthew S. Shugart. 1993. "Predicting the Number of Parties: A Quantitative Model of Duverger's Mechanical Effect." American Political Science Review 87:455-64.
52. Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1945. Democracy in America. New York: Knopf.
53. Weisner, Eduardo. 1994. Fiscal Decentralization and Social Spending in Latin America: The Search for Efficiency and Equity. Washington, DC: World Bank Working Paper Series 199.