Vortex fluctuations in the critical casimir effect of superfluid and superconducting films

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 92, Issue 19, 2004, Pages

  Williams, Gary A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; DATA REDUCTION; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; FREE ENERGY; HIGH TEMPERATURE EFFECTS; INTEGRAL EQUATIONS; MAGNETOELECTRIC EFFECTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; PHASE TRANSITIONS; QUANTUM THEORY; SUPERCONDUCTING MATERIALS; SUPERFLUID HELIUM; THIN FILMS;

CASIMIR EFFECTS; FILM THICKNESS; VORTEX FLUCTUATIONS; VORTEX LOOP TRANSITIONS;

SUPERCONDUCTING FILMS;

EID: 3042560003     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.197003     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. R. Dionne and R. Hallock, in Quantum Fluids and Solids - 1989, edited by G. Ihas and Y. Takano, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 194 (AIP, New York, 1989), p. 199.
2. R. Garcia and M. Chan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1187 (1999).
3. M. Krech and S. Dietrich, Phys. Rev. A 46, 1886 (1992); 46, 1922 (1992); M. Krech, The Casimir Effect in Critical Systems (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994).
4. M. Krech and S. Dietrich, Phys. Rev. A 46, 1886 (1992); 46, 1922 (1992); M. Krech, The Casimir Effect in Critical Systems (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994).
5. M. Krech and S. Dietrich, Phys. Rev. A 46, 1886 (1992); 46, 1922 (1992); M. Krech, The Casimir Effect in Critical Systems (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994).
6. G. A. Williams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1201 (1999).
7. S. R. Shenoy, Phys. Rev. B 40, 5056 (1989).
8. G. A. Williams, J. Low Temp. Phys. 101, 415 (1995).
9. M. E. Fisher and P. G. DeGennes, C.R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 287, 207 (1978).
10. The difference between the loop and the ε-expansion values for Δ is within the 10%-20% uncertainty of each calculation: the expansion is only carried out to linear order in ε, while the Monte Carlo data used in the loop fit [6] had fairly high statistical errors.
11. G. A. Williams, J. Low Temp. Phys. 101, 463 (1995).
12. J.M. Kosterlitz, J. Phys. C 7, 1046 (1974).
13. V Ambegaokar, B. Halperin, D. Nelson, and E. Siggia, Phys. Rev. B 21, 1806 (1980).
14. B. Chattopadhyay and S.R. Shenoy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 400 (1994); S. R. Shenoy and B. Chattopadhyay, Phys. Rev. B 51, 9129 (1995).
15. B. Chattopadhyay and S.R. Shenoy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 400 (1994); S. R. Shenoy and B. Chattopadhyay, Phys. Rev. B 51, 9129 (1995).
16. A. Nguyen and A. Sudbø, Phys. Rev. B 60, 15 307 (1999); A. Junod, M. Roulin, B. Revaz, and A. Erb, Physica (Amsterdam) 280B, 214 (2000); J. Kötzler, D. Görlitz, S. Skwirblies, and A. Wriedt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 127005 (2001).
17. A. Nguyen and A. Sudbø, Phys. Rev. B 60, 15 307 (1999); A. Junod, M. Roulin, B. Revaz, and A. Erb, Physica (Amsterdam) 280B, 214 (2000); J. Kötzler, D. Görlitz, S. Skwirblies, and A. Wriedt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 127005 (2001).
18. A. Nguyen and A. Sudbø, Phys. Rev. B 60, 15 307 (1999); A. Junod, M. Roulin, B. Revaz, and A. Erb, Physica (Amsterdam) 280B, 214 (2000); J. Kötzler, D. Görlitz, S. Skwirblies, and A. Wriedt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 127005 (2001).
19. K. Osborn et al., Phys. Rev. B 68, 144516 (2003).
20. P. Hirschfeld and N. Goldenfeld, Phys. Rev. B 48, 4219 (1993); D. Bonn et al., Phys. Rev. B 50, 4051 (1994).
21. P. Hirschfeld and N. Goldenfeld, Phys. Rev. B 48, 4219 (1993); D. Bonn et al., Phys. Rev. B 50, 4051 (1994).
22. M. Moriya et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 11, 2700 (2001).
23. V. Kotsubo and G. A. Williams, Phys. Rev. B 33, 6106 (1986).
24. S. J. Turneare, T. R. Lemberger, and J. Graybeal, Phys. Rev. B 63, 174505 (2001).
25. C. Pethick and H. Smith, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 119, 133 (1979).
26. H. J. Mamin, J. Clarke, and D. J. Van Harlingen, Phys. Rev. B 29, 3881 (1984).