XML-based adaptation framework for psychological-driven E-learning systems

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 18-29

  Rumetshofer, Hildegard ^a   Wöß, Wolfram ^a  

^a JOHANNES KEPLER UNIVERSITY LINZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

Cognitive styles; Digital learning environment; Intelligent learning environment; Learning technologies; Metadata for education; Personalized learning objects; XML; XSLT

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042551359     PISSN: 14364522     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ayersman, D., Minden, A. (1995). Individual differences, computers, and instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 20 (10), 1-20.
2. Barba, R. (1993). The effects of embedding an instructional map in hypermedia courseware. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25 (4), 405-412.
3. Bostock, S. (1998). Learning Styles, Keele University Home, http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/cs/Stephen_Bostock/docs/LearningStyles.htm.
4. Brusilovsky, P. (2001). Adaptive Hypermedia, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11, 87-110.
5. CHI (Computer Human Interaction) (2001). Notes From E-learning Special Interest Group (SIG) Discussion, http://elearnmag.org/.
6. Conner, M., Wright, E., Devries, L., Curry, K., Zeider, C., Wilmsmeyer, D., and Forman, D. (1996). Learning: The Critical Technology, Wave Technologies International, Inc.
7. Dufresne, A., and Turcotte, S. (1997). Cognitive style and its implications for navigation strategies, World Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education, AI-ED'97.
8. Hambrecht & Co, (2001). eLearning - A key strategy for maximizing human capital in the knowledge economy, PrimeLearning Inc., http://www.astd.org.
9. Hsiao, Y. (1997). The Effects of Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies in a Hypermedia Environment: A Review of Literature, http://www.edb.utexas.edu/mmresearch/Students97/Hsiao/index.html.
10. IEEE (2002). Learning Object Metadata, http://ltsc.ieee.org/doc/wg12/LOM_WD6_4.pdf.
11. Jacobsen, Peder (2001). Reusable Learning Objects - What does the future hold?, e-learning Magazine, November 2001.
12. Jonassen, D. H. (1988). Integrating learning strategies into courseware to facilitate deeper processing. In Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware, D. Jonassen, Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 151-181.
13. nd Edition, Programmers Reference, Wrox Press Ltd., Canada.
14. Kearsley, G. (2002). Explorations in Learning & Instruction: The Theory Into Practice Database, http://tip.psychology.org.
15. Kogan, N. (1971). Educational Implications of Cognitive Style. In Psychology and Educational Practice, G. S. Lesser, Ed. Glenview, Ill: Scott Foresman and Co, 242-292.
16. Liu, M., Reed, W. M. (1994). The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 10 (4), 419-434.
17. McGreal, R., and Roberts, T. (2001). A Primer on Metadata for Learning Objects, http://www.elearningmag.com/issues/Oct01/learningobjects.asp.
18. Orr, K. L., Davidson, G. V. (1992). The effects of group computer-based instruction and learning style on achievement and attitude. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 1, 781-792.
19. Preece, J., Davies, G. (1992). Multimedia: Some Promises, Some Problems and Some Issues in Human-Systems Interaction. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 1, 259-366.
20. Souto, M. A. M., Verdin, R., Beschoren K., Zanella, R., Nicolao, M., Madeira, M., Viccari, R. M., Palazzo de Oliveira, J. (2002). Web Adaptive Training System based on Cognitive Student Style, In Proceedings of the 17th IFIP World Computer Congress, Kluwer, Montréal, Canada.
21. Thornburg, D., Pea, R. (1991). Synthesizing instructional technologies and educational culture: Exploring cognition and metacognition in the social studies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7 (2), 121-164.
22. Witkin, H., Moore, C., Goodenough, D., Cox, P. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47 (1), 1-64.
23. XML, (2001). Extensible Markup Language 1.0 (Second Edition), W3C Recommendation, http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml.html, November 2001.
24. XSLT, (1999). XSL Transformations 1.0, W3C Recommendation, http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt.htm, April 2001.