Optimal timing of the Ross procedure in the management of chronic aortic incompetence in the young

Cardiology in the Young

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 253-257

  Cheung, Michael M H ^a   Sullivan, Ian D ^a   de Leval, Marc R ^a   Tsang, Victor T ^a   Redington, Andrew N ^a  

^a GREAT ORMOND STREET HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aortic regurgitation; Pulmonary autograft; Ventricular function

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AORTA SURGERY; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; AORTA WALL; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; FOLLOW UP; HEART CONTRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HUMAN; M MODE ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AORTIC VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CHRONIC DISEASE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 3042546030     PISSN: 10479511     EISSN: 14671107     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1047951103000490     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Fioretti P, Roelandt D, Bos R. Echocardiography in chronic: Aortic insufficiency: Is valve replacement too late when left ventricular end-systolic dimension reaches 55 mm? Circulation 1983; 67: 216-221.
2. Daniel WG, Flood WP Jr, Siart A, et al. Chronic aortic regurgitation: Reassessment of the prognostic value of preoperative left ventricular end-systolic dimension and fractional shortening. Circulation 1985; 71: 669-680.
3. Kumpuris AG, Quinones MA, Waggoner AD, Kanon DJ, Nelson JG, Miller RR. Importance of preoperative hypertrophy, wall stress and end-systolic dimension as echocardiographic predictors of normalization of left ventricular dilatation after valve replacement in chronic: Aortic insufficiency. Am J Cardiol 1982; 49: 1091-1100.
4. Stone PH, Clark RD, Goldschlager N, Selzer A, Cohn K. Determinants of prognosis of patients with aortic regurgitation who undergo aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 3: 1118-1126.
5. Henry WL, Bonow RO, Rosing DR, Epstein SE. Observations on the optimum time for operative intervention for aortic regurgitation. II. Serial echocardiographic evaluation of asymptomatic patients. Circulation 1980; 61: 484-492.
6. Gaasch WH, Andrias CW, Levine HJ. Chronic aortic regurgitation: The effect of aortic valve replacement on left ventricular volume, mass and function. Circulation 1978; 58: 825-836.
7. Ross DN. Replacement of the aortic valve and mitral valves with a pulmonary autograft. Lancet 1967; 2: 956-958.
8. Savoye C, Auffray JL, Hubert E, et al. Echocardiographic follow-up after Ross procedure in 100 patients. Am J Cardiol 2000; 185: 854-857.
9. Santangelo K, Elkins RC, Stelzer P, et al. Normal left ventricular function following pulmonary autograft replacement of the aortic valve in children. J Card Surg 1991; 6 (Suppl 4): 633-637.
10. Rubay JE, Shango P, Clement S, et al. Ross procedure in congenital patients: Results and left ventricular function. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997; 11: 92-99.
11. Hokken RB, Cromme-Dijkhuis AH, Bogers AJ, et al. Clinical outcome and left ventricular function after pulmonary autograft implantation in children. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63: 1713-1717.
12. Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: Results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements Circulation 1978; 58: 1072-1083.
13. Nidorf SM, Picard MH, Triulzi MO, et al. New perspectives in the assessment of cardiac chamber dimensions during development and adulthood. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 983-988.
14. St John Sutton MG, Marier DL, Oldershaw PJ, Sacchetti R, Gibson DG. Effect of age related changes in chamber size, wall thickness, and heart rate on left ventricular function in normal children. Br Heart J 1982; 48: 342-351.
15. Tarasoutchi F, Grinberg M, Filho JP, et al. Symptoms, left ventricular function, and timing of valve replacement surgery in patients with aortic regurgitation. Am Heart J 1999; 138 (3 Pt 1): 477-485.
16. Elkins R, Lane M, McCue C. Pulmonary autograft reoperation: Incidence and management. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 62: 450-455.
17. Bonow RO, Carabello B, de Leon AC Jr, et al. Guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: Executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease). Circulation 1998; 98: 1949-1984.
18. Kasegawa H, Kawazoe K, Fujita T, Nakajima N, Masuda Y, Park YD. Assessment of relationship between the pattern of hypertrophy and the function of left ventricle in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. Jpn Circ J 1990; 54: 161-174.
19. Gaasch WH. Left ventricular radius to wall thickness ratio. Am J Cardiol 1979; 43: 1189-1194.
20. Ford L. Heart size. Circ Res 1976; 39: 291-303.
21. St John Sutton M, Oldershaw P, Kotler M. Textbook of echocardiography and Doppler in adults and children, 2nd edn. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, 1996.
22. Collinson J, Henein M, Flather M, Pepper JR, Gibson DG. Valve replacement for aortic stenosis in patients with poor left ventricular function: Comparison of early changes with stented and stentless valves. Circulation 1999; 100 (Suppl 19): II1-II5.
23. Sutton M, Plappert T, Spiegel A, et al. Early postoperative changes in left ventricular chamber size, architecture, and function in aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation and their relation to intraoperative changes in afterload: A prospective two-dimensional echocardiographic study. Circulation 1987; 76: 77-89.