A molecular phylogeny of the Percidae (Teleostei, Perciformes) based on mitochondrial DNA sequence

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 545-562

  Sloss, Brian L ^a   Billington, Neil ^b   Burr, Brooks M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN STEVENS POINT   (United States)

^b TROY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

12S rRNA; Cytochrome b; Mitochondrial DNA; Percidae; Phylogenetics; Systematics

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME B; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; RIBOSOME RNA; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 12S;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PERCH; PHYLOGENY;

ANIMALS; CYTOCHROMES B; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; PERCHES; PHYLOGENY; RNA, RIBOSOMAL;

AMMOCRYPTA; ANHINGIDAE; CRYSTALLARIA; ETHEOSTOMA; GYMNOCEPHALUS; PERCA; PERCIDAE; PERCIFORMES; PERCINA; PISCES; ROMANICHTHYS; TELEOSTEI; ZINGEL;

EID: 3042545213     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2004.01.011     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr. 19:1974;716-723
2. Alves-Gomez J.A., Ortí G., Haygood M., Heiligenberg W., Meyer A. Phylogenetic analysis of the South American electric fishes (Order: Gymnotiformes) and the evolution of their electrogenic system: A synthesis based on morphology, electrophysiology and mitochondrial sequence data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:1995;298-318
3. Bailey R.M., Etnier D.A. Comments on the subgenera of darters (Percidae) with descriptions of two new species of Etheostoma (Ulocentra) from Southeastern United States. Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan. 175:1988;1-48
4. Bailey R.M., Gosline W.A. Variation and systematic significance of vertebral counts in the American fishes of the family percidae. Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan. 93:1955;1-44
5. Billington N., Danzmann R., Hebert P., Ward R. Phylogenetic relationships among four members of Stizostedion (Percidae) determined by mitochondrial DNA and allozyme analysis. J. Fish Biol. 39:1991;251-258
6. Bull J.J., Huelsenbeck J.P., Cunningham C.W., Swofford D.L., Waddell P.J. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:1993;384-397
7. Chang Y.S., Huang F.L., Lo T.B. The complete nucleotide sequence and gene organization of carp (Cyprinus carpio) mitochondrial genome. J. Mol. Evol. 38:1994;138-155
8. Coburn M.M., Gaglione J.I. A comparative study of percid scales (Teleostei: Perciformes). Copeia. 1992:1992;986-1001
9. Collette B.B. The subfamilies, tribes and genera of the Percidae (Teleostei). Copeia. 1963:1963;615-623
10. Collette B.B., Banarescu P. Systematics and zoogeography of the fishes of the family Percidae. J. Fish. Res. Board Canada. 34:1977;1450-1463
11. Craig J. Percid Fishes: Systematics, Ecology and Exploitation. 2000;Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, UK
12. Cunningham C.W. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:1997;733-740
13. de Queiroz A. For consensus (sometimes). Syst. Biol. 42:1993;368-372
14. de Quieroz A., Donoghue M.J., Kim J. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26:1995;647-681
15. Dixon M.T., Hillis D.M. Ribosomal RNA secondary structure: compensatory mutations and implications for phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1993;256-267
16. Dumitrescu M., Banarescu P., Stoica N. Romanichthys valsanicola nov. gen. nov. sp. (Pisces, Percidae). Trav. Mus. Hist. Natur. "Grigore Antipa" 1:1957;225-244
17. Farris J.S., Källersjö M., Kluge A.G., Bult C. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst. Biol. 51:1995;19-31
18. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:1981;368-376
19. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 13:1985;93-104
20. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package) version 3.5. 1993;University of Washington, Seattle
21. Fitch W.M. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst. Zool. 20:1971;406-416
22. Froese, R., Pauly, D., 2003. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication, version 16, www.fishbase.org
23. Grewe P.M., Kreuger C.C., Aquadro C.F., Bermingham E., Kincaid H.L., May B. Mitochondrial DNA variation among lake trout strains stocked into Lake Ontario. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50:1993;2397-2403
24. Gutell R.R. Collection of small subunit (16S- and 16S-like) ribosomal RNA structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:1994;3502-3507
25. Hasegawa M., Hashimoto T. Ribosomal RNA trees misleading? Nature. 361:1993;23
26. Higgins D.G., Bleasby A.J., Fuchs R. CLUSTAL W: improved software for multiple sequence alignment. CABIOS. 8:1992;189-191
27. Hillis D.M., Dixon M.T. Ribosomal DNA: molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference. Quart. Rev. Biol. 66:1991;411-453
28. Huelsenbeck J.P. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Distributed by author. 2000;Department of Biology, University of Rochester
29. Huelsenbeck J.P., Ronquist F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics. 17:2001;754-755
30. IUCN, 2003. 2003 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Available from 〈www.redlist.org〉
31. Kishino H., Hasegawa M. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29:1989;170-179
32. Kocher T.D., Thomas W.K., Meyer A., Edwards S.V., Pääbo S., Vilablanca F.X., Wilson A.C. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in mammals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 86:1989;6196-6200
33. Krajewski C., Blacket M., Buckley L., Westerman M. A multigene assessment of phylogenetic relationships within the dasyurid marsupial subfamily Sminthopsinae. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 8:1997;236-248
34. Krajewski C.K., Fain M.G., Buckley L., King D.G. Dynamically heterogenous partitions and phylogenetic inference: an evaluation of analytical strategies with cytochrome. b and ND6 gene sequences in cranes, Mol Phylogenet. Evol. 13:1999;302-313
35. Kumar S., Tamura K., Nei M. MEGA: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis, version 1.01. 1993;Penn. State University, University Park, PA
36. Lanyon S.M. The stochastic mode of molecular evolution: what consequences for systematic investigations. Auk. 105:1988;565-573
37. Larget B., Simon D.L. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1999;750-759
38. Lockhart P.J., Howe C.J., Bryant D.A., Beanland T.J., Larkum A.W.D. Substitutional bias confounds inference of cyanelle origins from sequence data. J. Mol. Evol. 34:1992;153-162
39. Lydeard C., Roe K.J. The phylogenetic utility of the mitochondrial cytochrome. b gene for inferring relationships among actinopterygian fishes Kocher T.D., Stepien C.A. Molecular Systematics of Fishes. 1997;285-303 Academic Press, San Diego
40. Maddison W.P., Maddison D.R. MacClade analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 3. 1992;Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
41. Mau B., Newton M.A., Larget B. Bayesian phylogenetic inference via Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Biometrics. 55:1999;1-12
42. McCully H.H. The relationship of the Percidae and Centrarchidae to the Serranidae as shown by the anatomy of their scales. Amer. Zool. 2:1962;430
43. Meyer A. Evolution of mitochondrial DNA of fishes. Hochachka P.W., Mommsen P. The Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Fishes. Vol. 2:1993;1-38 Elsevier, Amsterdam
44. Miyamoto M.M., Fitch W.M. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst. Biol. 44:1995;64-76
45. Near T.J. Phylogenetic relationships of Percina (Percidae: Etheostomatinae). Copeia. 2002:2002;1-14
46. Near T.J., Porterfield J.C., Page L.M. Evolution of cytochrome. b and the molecular systematics of Ammocrypta (Percidae: Etheostomatinae) Copeia. 2000:2000;701-711
47. Nelson J.S. Fishes of the World. second ed. 1984;Wiley, New York
48. Ortí G., Petry P., Porto J.I.R., Jegu M., Meyer A. Patterns of nucleotide change in mitochondrial ribosomal RNA genes and the phylogeny of piranhas. J. Mol. Evol. 42:1996;169-182
49. Page L.M. The lateralis system of darters (Etheostomatini). Copeia. 1977:1977;472-475
50. Page L.M. The genera and subgenera of darters (Percidae, Etheostomatini). Occ. Papers KS Mus. Nat. Hist. 90:1981;1-69
51. Page L.M. Handbook of Darters. 1983;T.F.H. Publications, Neptune City, NJ
52. Page L.M. Evolution of reproductive behaviors in percid fishes. IL Nat. Hist. Surv. Bull. 33:1985;275-295
53. Page L.M. Etheostomatinae. Craig J.F. Percid Fishes: Systematics, Ecology, and Exploitation. 2000;225-253 Blackwell Science, Oxford
54. Page L.M., Swofford D.L. Morphological correlates to ecological specialization in darters. Env. Biol. Fish. 11:1984;139-159
55. Page L.M., Whitt G.S. Lactate dehydrogenase isozymes, malate dehydrogenase isozymes and tetrazolium oxidase mobilities of darters (Etheostomatini). Comp. Biochem. Phys. 44B:1973;611-623
56. Page L.M., Whitt G.S. Lactate dehydrogenase isozymes of darters and the inclusiveness of the genus Percina. IL Nat. Hist. Surv. Bull. Notes. 82:1973;1-7
57. Porterfield J.C., Page L.M., Near T.J. Phylogenetic relationships among fantail darters (Percidae: Etheostoma: Catonotus): total evidence analysis of morphological and molecular data. Copeia. 1999:1999;551-564
58. Posada D., Crandall K.A. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics. 14:1998;817-818
59. Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:1987;406-425
60. Shimodaira H., Hasegawa M. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1999;1114-1116
61. Sidow A., Wilson A.C. Compositional statistics: an improvement of evolutionary parsimony and its deep branches in the tree of life. J. Mol. Evol. 31:1990;51-68
62. Simon C., Frati F., Beckenbach A., Crespi B., Liu H., Flook P. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87:1994;651-701
63. Simons A.M. Phylogenetic relationships of the Boleosoma species group (Percidae: Etheostoma). Mayden R.L. Systematics, Historical Ecology, and North American Freshwater Fishes. 1992;268-292 Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA
64. Song C.B., Near T.J., Page L.M. Phylogenetic relations among Percid fishes as inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome. b DNA sequence data Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 10:1998;343-353
65. Springer M.S., Douzery E. Secondary structure and patterns of evolution among mammalian mitochondrial 12S rRNA molecules. J. Mol. Evol. 43:1996;357-373
66. Springer M.S., Hollar L.J., Burke A. Compensatory substitutions and the evolution of the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene in mammals. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:1995;1138-1150
67. Stepien C.A., Dillon A.K., Brooks M.J., Chase K.L., Hubers A.N. The evolution of Blennioid fishes based. Kocher T.D., Stepien C.A. Molecular Systematics of Fishes. 1997;245-270 Academic Press, San Diego
68. Sumida M., Ogata M., Nishioka M. Molecular phylogenetic relationships of pond frogs distributed in the palearctic region inferred from DNA sequences of mitochondrial 12S ribosomal RNA and cytochrome. b genes Mol. Phylogenent. Evol. 16:2000;278-285
69. Swofford D.L. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods) 4.0. 2002;Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA
70. Templeton A.R. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the humans and apes. Evolution. 37:1983;221-244
71. Turner T.F. Mitochondrial control region sequences and phylogenetic systematics of darters (Teleostei: Percidae). Copeia. 1997:1997;319-338
72. Wiley E.O. Phylogenetic relationships of the Percidae (Teleostei: Perciformes): A preliminary hypothesis. Mayden R.L. Systematics, Historical Ecology, and North American Freshwater Fishes. 1992;247-267 Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA
73. Wood R.M., Mayden R.L. Phylogenetic relationships of selected darter subgenera (Teleostei: Percidae) as inferred from analysis of allozymes. Copeia. 1997:1997;265-274