Configuration effects on texture transparency

Spatial Vision

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 187-200

  Kawabe, Takahiro ^a   Miura, Kayo ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Boundary assignment; Perceptual transparency; Texture segregation

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; DIFFRACTION GRATINGS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; LIGHT; SURFACE PROPERTIES; VISION;

BOUNDARY ASSIGNMENT; ORIENTATION-MODULATION GRATINGS (OMG); PERCEPTUAL TRANSPARENCY; TEXTURE SEGREGATION;

TEXTURES;

ARTICLE; HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHYSIOLOGY;

FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; SENSORY THRESHOLDS;

EID: 3042543653     PISSN: 01691015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/1568568041865971     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Adelson, E. H. (1993). Perceptual organization and the judgment of brightness, Science 262, 2042-2044.
2. Adelson, E. H. and Movshon, A. (1982). Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns, Nature 300, 523-525.
3. Beck, J., Prazny, K. and Ivry, R. (1984). The perception of transparency with achromatic colors, Perception and Psychophysics 35, 407-422.
4. Brown J. M. and Weisstein, N. (1988). A spatial frequency effect on perceived depth, Perception and Psychophysics 44, 157-166.
5. Campbell, F. W. and Robson, J. G. (1968). Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings, J. Physiol. 197, 551-566.
6. Caputo, G. (1998). Texture brightness filling-in, Vision Research 38, 841-851.
7. Kingdom, F. A. A. and Keeble, D. R. T. (2000). Luminance spatial frequency differences facilitate the segmentation of superimposed textures, Vision Research 40, 1077-1087.
8. Kingdom, F. A. A., Ziegler, L. R. and Hess, R. F. (2001). Luminance spatial scale facilitates stereoscopic depth segmentation, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A 18, 993-1002.
9. Legge, G. E. and Foley, J. M. (1980). Contrast masking in human vision, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 70, 1458-1470.
10. Metelli, F. (1974). The perception of transparency, Sci. Amer. 230, 90-98.
11. Metelli, F. (1985). Stimulation and perception of transparency, Psychol. Res. 47, 185-202.
12. Mitsudo, H. (2003). Information regarding structure and lightness based on phenomenal transparency influences the efficiency of visual search, Perception 32, 53-66.
13. Motoyoshi, I. (1999). Texture filling-in and texture segregation revealed by transient masking, Vision Research 39, 1285-1291.
14. Motoyoshi, I. and Nishida, S. (2001). Visual response saturation to orientation-based texture segregation, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A 18, 2209-2219.
15. Motoyoshi, I. and Nishida, S. (2002). Spatiotemporal interactions in detection of texture orientation modulations, Vision Research 42, 2829-2841.
16. Singh, M. and Anderson, B. L. (2002a). Perceptual assignment of opacity to translucent surfaces: the role of image blur, Perception 31, 532-552.
17. Singh, M. and Anderson, B. L. (2002b). Toward a perceptual theory of transparency, Psychol. Rev. 109, 492-519.
18. Spehar, B. and Zaidi, Q. (1997). New configurational effects on perceived contrast and brightness: second-order White's effects, Perception 26, 409-417.
19. Watanabe, T. and Cavanagh, P. (1992). The role of transparency in perceptual grouping and pattern recognition? Perception 21, 133-139.
20. Watanabe, T. and Cavanagh, P. (1996). Texture laciness: the texture equivalent of transparency? Perception 25, 293-303.