Work stress and coping: Drawing together research and practice

British Journal of Guidance and Counselling

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 143-156

  Dewe, Philip ^a   Trenberth, Linda ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042536534     PISSN: 03069885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03069880410001692201     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. ABBOTT, A. (1990). Positivism and interpretation in sociology: lessons for sociologists from the history of stress research. Sociological Forum, 5, 435-458.
2. ALDWIN, C.M. (2000). Stress, Coping and Development: an Integrative Perspective. London: Guilford Press.
3. BEEHR, T.A. & McGRATH, J.E. (1996). The methodology of research on coping: conceptual, strategic, and operational-level issues. In M. ZEIDNER & N.S. ENDLER (Eds), Handbook of Coping: Theory, Research, Applications (65-82). New York: John Wiley.
4. BRIEF, A.P. & GEORGE, J.M. (1991). Psychological stress and the workplace: a brief comment on Lazarus' outlook. In P.L. PERREWÉ (Ed.), Handbook on job stress. Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 6, 15-20.
5. COSTA, P.T., SOMERFIELD, M.R. & McCRAE, R.R. (1996). Personality and coping: a reconceptualization. In M. ZEIDNER & N.M. ENDLER (Eds), Handbook of Coping: Theory, Research, Applications (pp. 44-61). New York: John Wiley.
6. COYNE, J.C. (1997). Improving coping research: raze the slum before any more building! Journal of Health Psychology, 2, 153-155.
7. COYNE, J.C. & GOTTLIEB, B.H. (1996). The mismeasure of coping by checklist. Journal of Personality, 64, 959-991.
8. COYNE, J.C. & RACIOPPO, M.W. (2000). Never the twain shall meet? Closing the gap between coping research and clinical intervention research. American Psychologist, 55, 655-664.
9. DEWE, P. (2001). Work stress, coping and well-being: implementing strategies to better understand the relationship. In: PERREWE, P.L. & GANSTER, D. (Eds), Exploring Theoretical Mechanisms and Perspectives Vol. 1 (pp. 63-96) Amsterdam: JAI-Elsevier Science.
10. DEWE, P. (2003). A closer examination of the patterns when coping with work-related stress: implications for measurement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 517-524.
11. DOUBLET, S. (2000). The Stress Myth. Freemans Reach, NSW. Australia: IPSILON Publishing.
12. FOLKMAN, S. & MOSKOWITZ, J.T. (2000). Positive affect and the other side of coping. American Psychologist, 55, 647-654.
13. KAHN, R.L., WOLFE, D.M., QUINN, R.P., SNOEK, J.D. & ROSENTHAL, R.A. (1964). Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity. New York: John Wiley.
14. Lazarus, R.S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. LAZARUS, R.S. (1990). Theory-based stress measurement. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 3-13.
16. LAZARUS, R.S. (1991). Psychological stress in the workplace. In PERREWÉ P.L. (Ed.), Handbook on job stress. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 1-13.
17. LAZARUS, R.S. (1999). Stress and Emotion: a New Synthesis. London: Free Association Books.
18. LAZARUS, R.S. (2000). Toward better research on stress and coping. American Psychologist, 55, 665-673.
19. LAZARUS, R.S. & COHEN-CHARASH, Y. (2001). Discrete emotions in organizational life. In: PAYNE, R.L. & COOPER, C.L. (Eds), Emotions at Work: Theory, Research and Applications for Management. Chichester: John Wiley.
20. LIDDLE, H.A. (1994). Contextualizing resiliency. In: WONG, M.C. & GORDON, E.W. (Eds), Educational Resilience in Inner City America (pp. 167-177). Hillsdale, NY: Earlbaum.
21. NEWTON, T. (1995). Managing Stress: Emotion and Power at Work. London: Sage.
22. NEWTON, T. (1999). Stress discourse and individualization. In: FELTHAM, C. (Ed.), Controversies in Psychotherapy and Counselling (pp. 241-251). London: Sage.
23. PAYNE, R., JICK, T.D. & BURKE, R.J. (1982). Whither stress research? An agenda for the 1980s. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 3, 131-145.
24. PEARLIN, L.I. (1991). The study of coping: an overview of problems and direction. In: ECKENRODE, J. (Ed.), The Social Context of Coping (261-276). New York: Plenum Press.
25. PERREWE, P.L. & ZELLARS, K.L. (1999). An examination of attributions and emotions in the transactional approach to the organizational stress process. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 739-752.
26. SCHAUBROECK, J. (1999). Should the subjective be the objective? On studying mental processes, coping behavior, and actual exposures in organizational stress research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 753-760.
27. SCHWARZER, R. & SCHWARZER, C. (1996). A critical survey of coping instruments. In: ZEIDNER, M. & ENDLER, N.S. (Eds), Handbook of Coping: Theory, Research, Applications. New York: John Wiley.
28. SNYDER, C.R. (1999). Coping: The Psychology of What Works. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. SOMERFIELD, M.R. & McCRAE, R.R. (2000). Stress and coping research: methodological challenges, theoretical advances. American Psychologist, 55, 620-625.
30. STONE, A.A. & KENNEDY-MOORE, E. (1991). Assessing situational coping: conceptual and methodological considerations. In: FRIEDMAN, H.S. (Ed.), Hostility Coping and Health. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
31. TENNEN, H., AFFLECK, G., ARMELI, S. & CARNEY, M.A. (2000). A daily process approach to coping. American Psychologist, 55, 626-636.
32. WAINWRIGHT, D. & CALNAN, M. (2002). Work Stress: the Making of a Modern Epidemic. Buckingham & Philadelphia: Open University Press.
33. WEBER, H. & LAUX, L. (1990). Bringing the person back into stress and coping measurement. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 37-40.
34. ZEIDNER, M. & SAKLOFSKE, D. (1996). Adaptive and maladaptive coping. In: ZEIDNER, M. & ENDLER., N.S. (Eds), Handbook of Coping: Theory, Research, Applications (pp. 505-531). New York: John Wiley.