Effect of time on bond strength in indirect bonding

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 245-250

  Klocke, Arndt ^a,c   Shi, Jianmin ^a   Vaziri, Farhad ^b   Kahl Nieke, Bärbel ^a   Bismayer, Ulrich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^b Kieferorthopaedie ^*

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bond strength; Debonding time; In vitro; Indirect bonding; Transfer tray removal

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; SEALANT; STAINLESS STEEL; CUSTOM I.Q. SEALANT; MAXIMUM CURE; RELIANCE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SONDHI INDIRECT BONDING RESIN; TRANSBOND XT;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL BOND; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; IN VITRO STUDY; INCISOR; MEASUREMENT; NONHUMAN; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; CATTLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL DEBONDING; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RANDOMIZATION; SHEAR STRENGTH; SURVIVAL; TIME;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CATTLE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL DEBONDING; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; MATERIALS TESTING; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RESIN CEMENTS; SHEAR STRENGTH; STAINLESS STEEL; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 3042534269     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Silverman E, Cohen M, Gianelly AA, Dietz VS. A universal direct bonding system for both metal and plastic brackets. Am J Orthod. 1972;62:236-244.
2. Thomas RG. Indirect bonding, simplicity in action. J Clin Orthod. 1979;13:93-105.
3. Shiau JY, Rasmussen ST, Phelps AE, Enlow DH, Wolf GR. Bond strength of aged composites found in brackets placed by an indirect technique. Angle Orthod. 1993;63:213-220.
4. Shiau JY, Rasmussen ST, Phelps AE, Enlow DH, Wolf GR. Analysis of the "shear" bond strength of pretreated aged composites used in some indirect bonding techniques. J Dent Res. 1993;72:1291-1297.
5. Hocevar RA, Vincent HF. Indirect versus direct bonding: bond strength and failure location. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;94:367-371.
6. White LW. A new and improved indirect bonding technique. J Clin Orthod. 1999;33:17-23.
7. Read MJF, Pearson AI. A method for light-cured indirect bonding. J Clin Orthod. 1998;32:502-503.
8. Fox NA, McCabe JF, Buckley JG. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthod. 1994;21:33-43.
9. Chamda RA, Stein E. Time-related bond strengths of light-cured and chemically cured bonding systems: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:378-382.
10. Ching E, Cook PA, Bubb NL, Wood DJ. The effect of early static loading on the in vitro shear/peel bond strength of a 'no mix' orthodontic adhesive. Eur J Orthod. 2000;22:555-559.
11. Read MJF, O'Brien KD. A clinical trial of an indirect bonding technique with a visible light-cured adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;98:259-262.
12. Reichheld SJ, Ritucci RA, Gianelly AA. An indirect bonding technique. J Clin Orthod. 1990;24:21-24.
13. Hodge TM, Dhopatkar AA, Rock WP, Spary DJ. The Burton approach to indirect bonding. J Orthod. 2001;28:267-270.
14. Hickham JH. Predictable indirect bonding. J Clin Orthod. 1993;27:215-217.
15. Sinha PK, Nanda RS, Ghosh J. A thermal-cured, fluoride-releasing indirect bonding system. J Clin Orthod. 1995;29:97-100.
16. Horowitz EM, Knight LD, Sheridan JJ, Esmay T, Tovilo K. A new look at indirect bonding. J Clin Orthod. 1996;30:277-281.
17. Kalange JT. Ideal appliance placement with APC brackets and indirect bonding. J Clin Orthod. 1999;33:516-526.
18. Sondhi A. Efficient and effective indirect bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:352-359.
19. Klocke A, Shi J, Kahl-Nieke B, Bismayer U. Bond strength with custom base indirect bonding techniques. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:176-180.
20. Oesterle LJ, Shellhart WC, Belanger GK. The use of bovine enamel in bonding studies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:514-519.
21. Nakamichi I, Iwaku M, Fusayama T. Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test. J Dent Res. 1983;62:1076-1081.
22. Spitzer D, Ten Bosch JJ. The total luminescence of bovine and human dental enamel. Calcif Tissue Res. 1976;20:201-208.
23. Putt MS, Kleber CJ, Muhler JC. A comparison of the polishing properties of human and bovine enamel. J Dent Res. 1980;59:1177.
24. Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:333-340.
25. Bulman JS, Osborn JF. Significance tests. Part 3. Br Dent J. 1989;166:261-264.
26. Sheats RD, Pankratz VS. Common statistical tests. Semin Orthod. 2002;8:77-86.
27. Tavas MA, Watts DC. A visible light-activated direct bonding material: an in vitro comparative study. Br J Orthod. 1984;11:33-37.
28. Graenlaw R, Way DC, Galil KA. An in vitro evaluation of a visible light-cured resin as an alternative to conventional resin bonding systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;96:214-220.
29. Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Davidson CL. Stiffness increase during the setting of dental composite resins. J Dent Res. 1987;66:1713-1716.
30. McCabe JF, Walls AWG. The treatment of results for tensile bond strength testing. J Dent. 1986;14:165-168.
31. Sargison AE, McCabe JF, Gordon PH. An ex vivo study of self-, light-, and dual-cured composites for orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1995;22:319-323.
32. Littlewood SJ, Mitchell L, Greenwood DC. A randomized controlled trial to investigate brackets bonded with a hydrophilic primer. J Orthod. 2001;28:301-305.
33. Eliades T, Brantley WA. The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols. Eur J Orthod. 2000;22:13-23.
34. Hara AT, Pimenta LAF, Rodrigues AL. Influence of cross-head speed on resin-dentin shear bond strength. Dent Mater. 2001;17:165-169.