The role of genetics and environment in lifting force and isometric trunk extensor endurance

Physical Therapy

Volumn 84, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 608-621

  Ropponen, Annina ^a,b   Levälahti, Esko ^c   Videman, Tapio ^d   Kaprio, Jaakko ^c   Battié, Michele C ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Back muscle performance; Endurance; Environment; Genetics; Muscle force

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BACK MUSCLE; BIOMECHANICS; DATA ANALYSIS; DIZYGOTIC TWINS; ENDURANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; HUMAN; HUMAN GENETICS; ISOKINETIC EXERCISE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MONOZYGOTIC TWINS; MUSCLE FORCE; MUSCLE FUNCTION; MUSCLE ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; SAMPLING; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 3042526151     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/84.7.608     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Mayer TG, Gatchel R, Betancur J, Bovasso E. Trunk muscle endurance measurement: isometric contrasted to isokinetic testing in normal subjects. Spine. 1995;20:920-927.
2. Mandell PJ, Weitz E, Bernstein JI, et al. Isokinetic trunk strength and lifting strength measures: differences and similarities between low-back-injured and noninjured workers. Spine. 1993;18:2491-2501.
3. Gibbons LE, Videman T, Battié MC. Determinants of isokinetic and psychophysical lifting strength and static back muscle endurance: a study of male monozygotic twins. Spine. 1997;22:2983-2990.
4. Hupli M, Sainio P, Hurri H, Alaranta H. Comparison of trunk strength measurements between two different isokinetic devices used at clinical settings. J Spinal Disord. 1997;10:391-397.
5. Latikka P, Battié MC, Videman T, Gibbons LE. Correlations of isokinetic and psychophysical back lift and static back endurance tests in men. Clin Biomech. 1995;10:325-330.
6. Smith SS, Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Becker TJ. Quantification of lumbar function, part 1: isometric and multispeed isokinetic trunk strength measures in sagittal and axial planes in normal subjects. Spine. 1985; 10:757-764.
7. Troup JD, Foreman TK, Baxter CE, Brown D. The perception of back pain and the role of psychophysical tests of lifting capacity. Spine. 1987;12:645-657.
8. Keller A, Johansen JG, Hellesnes J, Brox JI. Predictors of isokinetic back muscle strength in patients with low back pain. Spine. 1999;24: 275-280.
9. Mostardi RA, Noe DA, Kovacik MW, Porterfield JA. Isokinetic lifting strength and occupational injury: a prospective study. Spine. 1992;17: 189-193.
10. Holmström E, Moritz U, Andersson M. Trunk muscle strength and back muscle endurance in construction workers with and without low back disorders. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1992;24:3-10.
11. Kankaanpää M, Laaksonen D, Taimela S, et al. Age, sex, and body mass index as determinants of back and hip extensor fatigue in the isometric Sörensen back endurance test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 79:1069-1075.
12. Battié MC, Bigos SJ, Fisher LD. Isometric lifting strength as a predictor of industrial back pain reports. Spine. 1989;14:851-856.
13. Estlander AM, Vanharanta H, Moneta GB, Kaivanto K. Anthropometric variables, self-efficacy beliefs and pain and disability ratings on the isokinetic performance on low back pain patients. Spine. 1994;19: 941-947.
14. Jerome JA, Hunter K, Gordon P, McKay N. A new robust index for measuring isokinetic trunk flexion and extension: outcome from a regional study. Spine. 1991;16:804-808.
15. Malchaire JB, Masset DF. Static and dynamic performances of the trunk and associated factors. Spine. 1995;20:1649-1656.
16. Bouchard C. Heredity and the path to overweight and obesity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991;23:285-291.
17. Taimela S, Kankaanpää M, Airaksinen O. A submaximal back extension endurance test utilizing subjective perception of low back fatigue. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1998;30:107-112.
18. Latimer J, Maher CG, Refshauge K, Colaco I. The reliability and validity of the Biering-Sorensen test in asymptomatic subjects and subjects reporting current or previous nonspecific low back pain. Spine. 1999;24:2085-2090.
19. Leino P, Aro S, Hasan J. Trunk muscle function and low back disorders: a ten-year follow-up study. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:289-296.
20. Luoto S, Heliävaara M, Hurri H, Alaranta H. Static back endurance and the risk of low-back pain. Clin Biomech. 1995;10:323-324.
21. Jörgensen K, Nicolaisen T. Trunk extensor endurance: determination and relation to low-back trouble. Ergonomics. 1987;30:259-267.
22. Suni J, Oja P, Miilunpalo S, et al. Health-related fitness test battery for adults: associations with perceived health, mobility, and back function and symptoms. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:559-569.
23. Hupli M, Hurri H, Luoto S, et al. Isokinetic performance capacity of trunk muscles, part I: the effect of repetition on measurement of isokinetic performance capacity of trunk muscles among healthy controls and two different groups of low back pain patients. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1996;28:201-206.
24. Rantanen P. Physical measurements and questionnaires as diagnostic tools in chronic low back pain. J Rehabil Med. 2001;33:31-35.
25. Lindström I, Öhlund C, Nachemson A. Physical performance, pain, pain behavior and subjective disability in patients with subacute low back pain. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1995;27:153-160.
26. Lethem J, Slade PD, Troup JDG, Bentley G. Outline of a fear-avoidance model of exaggerated pain perception: I. Behav Res Ther. 1983;21:401-408.
27. Slade PD, Troup JDG, Lethem J, Bentley G. The fear-avoidance model of exaggerated pain perception, II: preliminary studies of coping strategies for pain. Behav Res Ther. 1983;21:409-416.
28. Crombez G, Vervaet L, Lysens R, et al. Avoidance and confrontation of painful, back-straining movements in chronic back pain patients. Behav Modif. 1998;22:62-77.
29. Rissanen A, Alaranta H, Sainio P, Härkönen H. Isokinetic and non-dynamometric tests in low back pain patients related to pain and disability index. Spine. 1994;19:1963-1967.
30. Lackner JM, Carosella AM. The relative influence of perceived pain control, anxiety, and functional self-efficacy on spinal function among patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. 1999;24:2254-2261.
31. Grönblad M, Hurri H, Kouri JP. Relationship between spinal mobility, physical performance tests, pain intensity and disability assessments in chronic low back pain patients. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1997;29:17-24.
32. Beunen GP, Thomis MAI. Genetic determinants of sports participation and daily physical activity. Int J Obes. 1999;23:S55-S63.
33. Hazard RG, Reeves VM, Fenwick JW, et al. Test-retest variation in lifting capacity and indices of subject effort. Clin Biomech. 1993;8: 20-24.
34. Kaprio J, Sarna S, Koskenvuo M, Rantasalo I. The Finnish Twin Registry: formation and compilation, questionnaire study, zygosity determination procedures, and research program. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1978;24(pt B):179-184.
35. Battié MC, Videman T, Gibbons LE, et al. Determinants of lumbar disc degeneration: a study relating lifetime exposures and MRI findings in identical twins. Spine. 1995:21;2601-2612.
36. Ropponen A, Levälahti E, Simonen R, et al. Repeatability of lifetime exercise reporting. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2001;11:185-192.
37. Dvir Z. Clinical applicability of isokinetics: a review. Clin Biomech. 1991;6:133-144.
38. Foreman TK, Baxter CE, Troup JDG. Ratings of acceptable load and maximal isometric lifting strengths: the effects of repetition. Ergonomics. 1984;27:1283-1288.
39. Alaranta H, Soukka A, Harju R, Heliövaara M. Developing the Techniques Used for Diagnosing Musculoskeletal Diseases [in Finnish]. Helsinki, Finland: Finnish National Social Insurance Institution; 1990: 45-47.
40. Van Loan MD. Bioelectrical impedance analysis to determine fat-free mass, total body water and body fat. Sports Med. 1990;10: 205-217.
41. Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Baumgartner RN, Ross R. Estimation of skeletal muscle mass by bioelectric impedance analysis. J Appl Physiol. 2000;89:465-471.
42. Broeder CE, Burrhus KA, Svanevik LS, et al. Assessing body composition before and after resistance or endurance training. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 1997;29:705-712.
43. Ravaglia G, Forti P, Maioli F, Boschi F, et al. Measurement of body fat in healthy elderly men: a comparison of methods. J Gerontol, A Biol Sci Med Sci 1999;54;M70-M76.
44. Stata Statistical Software: Release 6.0. College Station, Tex: Stata Corp; 1999.
45. Rao JNK, Scott AJ. The analysis of categorical data from complex sample surveys: chi-squared tests for goodness of fit and independence in two-way tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1981;76: 221-230.
46. Neale MC. Mx: Statistical Modeling. 2nd ed. Richmond, Va: Department of Human Genetics, Medical College of Virginia; 1994.
47. Simoneau J, Bouchard C. Genetic determinism of fiber type proportion in human skeletal muscle. FASEB J. 1995;9:1091-1095.
48. Neale MC, Cardon LR. Methodology for Genetic Studies of Twins and Families. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic; 1992.
49. Lauderdale DS, Fabsitz R, Meyer JM, et al. Familial determinants of moderate and intense physical activity: a twin study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;29:1062-1068.