Educational performance and charter school authorizers: The accountability bind

Education Policy Analysis Archives

Volumn 9, Issue , 2001, Pages

  Bulkley, Katrina ^a,b,c  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Rutgers Graduate School of Education   (United States)

^c RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042525128     PISSN: 10682341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Adams, J., & Kirst, M. (1999). New demands and concepts for educational accountability: Striving for results in an era of excellence. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration: Second edition . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Arsen, D., Plank, D., & Sykes, G. (1999). School choice policies in Michigan: The rules matter . East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
3. Buechler, M. (1996, July). Charter Schools: Legislation and Results after Four Years (PR-B13). Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana Education Policy Center.
4. Bulkley, K. (1999a). Charter school authorizers: A new governance mechanism? Educational Policy, 13(5).
5. Bulkley, K. (1999b). Telling Stories: The Political Construction of Charter Schools. Unpublished Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
6. Bulkley, K. (1999c). Understanding the charter school concept in legislation: The cases of Arizona, Michigan and Georgia. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec.
7. Center for Education Reform. (2000). Charter schools today: Changing the face of American education . Washington, D.C.: author.
8. Clayton Foundation. (1999). 1998 Colorado charter schools evaluation study . Denver, Colorado: Colorado Department of Education.
9. Education Week. (1999). Quality Counts '99: Demanding Results . Washington, DC: Education Week.
10. Elmore, R. (1995). How schools construct accountability (Working paper ). New Brunswick, NJ: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
11. Elmore, R., Abelmann, C., & Fuhrman, S. (1996). The "New Accountability". In H. Ladd (Ed.), Holding Schools Accountable : Performance-Based Reform in Education . Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
12. Finn, C. E., Manno, B. V., & Vanourek, G. (2000). Charter schools in action: Renewing public education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Garn, G. (1998). The Accountability System for Arizona Charter Schools. Unpublished Dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
14. Hannaway, J. (1999). Contracting as a mechanism for managing education services (Policy Brief RB-28). Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
15. Henig, J. R., Moser, M., Holyoke, T. T., & Lacireno-Paquet, N. (1999). Making a choice, making a difference? An evaluation of charter schools in the District of Columbia . Washington, DC: Center for Washington Area Studies, George Washington University.
16. Hill, P., Lake, R., Celio, M. B., Campell, C., Herdman, P., & Bulkley, K. (2001). A study of charter school accountability . Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education, University of Washington.
17. Hill, P., Pierce, L., & Guthrie, J. (1997). Reinventing Public Education : How Contracting Can Transform America's Schools (RAND Research Study). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Horn, J., & Miron, G. (1998). First annual report of the evaluation of the charter schools and the charter school initiative in the state of Connecticut . Kalamazoo, MI: The Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University.
19. Horn, J., & Miron, G. (1999). Evaluation of the Michigan Public School Academy initiative . Kalamazoo, Michigan: The Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University.
20. Kolderie, T. (1990). Beyond Choice to New Public Schools: Withdrawing the Exclusive Franchise in Public Education (8). Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute.
21. Lake, R. J., & Millot, M. D. (1998). Accountability for Charter Schools: A Comparative Assessment of Charter School Laws . Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education.
22. Millot, M.D. (1996). Autonomy, accountability and the values of public education. Seattle, WA: Institute for Public Policy and Management, University of Washington/RAND.
23. Mulholland, L. (1996). Charter schools: The reform and the research . Tempe, Arizona: Morrison Institute for Public Policy.
24. Nathan, J. (1996). Charter schools: Creating hope and opportunity for American education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25. Public Sector Consultants, & MAXIMUS. (1999). Michigan's charter school initiative: From theory to practice . Lansing, MI: author.
26. RPP International. (1999). The state of charter schools, third year report: National Study of Charter Schools . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
27. RPP International. (2000). The state of charter schools: 2000 . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
28. Smith, M., & O'Day, J. (1991). Putting the pieces together: Systemic school reform . New Brunswick, NJ: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
29. SRI International. (1997). Evaluation of charter school effectiveness . Menlo Park, CA: Author.
30. SRI International. (2000). Evaluation of the public charter schools program: Year one evaluation report . Washington, DC: SRI International.
31. Tyack, D. (1993). School governance in the United States: Historical Puzzles and Anomalies. In J. Hannaway & M. Carnoy (Eds.), Decentralization and School Improvement . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32. Vergari, S. (2000). The regulatory styles of statewide charter school authorizers: Arizona, Massachusetts, and Michigan. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(5), 730-757.
33. Wells, A. S., & others. (1998). Beyond the rhetoric of charter school reform: A study of ten California school districts . Los Angeles: UCLA Charter School Study.
34. Wohlstetter, P., & Griffin, N. (1998). Creating and Sustaining Learning Communities: Early Lessons from Charter Schools (OP-03). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.