Ethical evaluation of research proposals by ethics panels advising the European Commission

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals

Volumn 32, Issue SUPPL. 1B, 2004, Pages 429-439

  Kolar, Roman ^a  

^a Animal Welfare Academy   (Germany)

Author keywords

Animal experiment; Ethical committees; Ethics; Fifth Research Framework Programme of the European Commission; Legislation

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL WELFARE; CONFERENCE PAPER; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EUROPEAN UNION; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LAW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH ETHICS; VOLUNTEER; WORKLOAD;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 3042521588     PISSN: 02611929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/026119290403201s69     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Anon. (2002). Ethical Review Under The Quality Of Life Programme. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
2. Anon. (1997). Treaty of Amsterdam amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and certain related acts - Protocol annexed to the Treaty of the European Community - Protocol on protection and welfare of animals. Official Journal of the European Communities C340, 110. http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/ aw/aw_legislation/general/ jc340_en.pdf.
3. Anon. (1986). Council Directive 86/609/EEC of 24 November 1986 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. Official Journal of the European Communities L358, 1-13. http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/aw/aw_legislation/scientific/86-609-eec_en. pdf.
4. Anon. (1998). Council Decision of 23 March 1998 concerning the conclusion by the Community of the European Convention for the protection of vertebrate animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes (1999/575/EC). Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/ dat/1999/1_222/1_22219990824en00290037.pdf.
5. Anon. (1998). Fifth Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (1998-2002). Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. http:// europa.eu.int/comm/research/fp5/ fp5-intro_en.html.
6. Anon. (1999). Decision No 182/1999/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 December 1998 concerning the Fifth Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (1998-2002). Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
7. Archer, L. & Hottois, G. (rapporteurs) (1997). Opinion of The Group of Advisers on the Ethical Implications of Biotechnology to the European Commission; no. 10; 11 December 1997 Reference: Opinion requested by the European Commission on 24 February 1997. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. http://europa.eu.int/ comm/european_group_ethics/index_en.htm.
8. Anon. (2000). The Fifth Framework Programme 1998-2002; Guide for Proposers, Part 1, Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources, Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. ftp://ftp.cordis.lu/pub/documents_r5/ natdir0000001/s_1578005_20010221_112429_5QUG001402en.pdf.
9. Anon. (2000). Vade Mecum for Experts Taking Part in Proposal Evaluation in the Quality of Life & Management of Living Resources Programme. 4th Edition 2000, updated version for the evaluation of proposals submitted from the 11 October 2000 deadline onwards. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
10. Delpire, V.C., Mepham, B. & Balls, M. (1999). A proposal for a new ethical scheme addressing the use of laboratory animals for biomedical purposes. ATLA 27, 869-881.
11. Anon. (2002). The Process of Addressing the Ethical Dimension of Animal Experimentation and Implementing the Principle of the Three Rs under the "Quality of Life" Programme. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.