Reduction by well-defined objectives

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals

Volumn 32, Issue SUPPL. 1A, 2004, Pages 241-244

  Fry, Derek ^a  

^a Home Office Central Research Establishment   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Experimental design; Objectives; Research strategy

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TESTING REDUCTION; ANIMAL TESTING REFINEMENT; ANIMAL USE; CONFERENCE PAPER; DECISION MAKING; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 3042519585     PISSN: 02611929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/026119290403201s40     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Home Office (2000). Guidance on the Operation of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, Appendix A, p. 56. London, UK: HMSO.
2. Home Office (2000). Guidance on the Operation of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, Appendix D, p. 78. London, UK: HMSO.
3. Fry, D. & Morton, D. (1999). Non-statistical experimental design as an aid to refinement. In Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation (ed. M. Balls, A-M. van Zeller & M.E. Halder), pp. 1687-1690. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V.
4. Fry, D.J. (1998). Relating criteria for humane end-points to objectives. In Humane Endpoints in Animal Experiments for Biomedical Research (ed. C.F.M. Hendriksen & D. Morton), pp. 54-57. London, UK: Royal Society of Medicine Press Limited.
5. Shaw, R., Festing, M., Peers, I. & Furlong, L. (2002). Use of factorial designs to optimize animal experiments and reduce animal use. ILAR Journal 43, 223-232.
6. Festing, M.F.W., Overend, P., Gaines Das, R., Cortina Borja, M. & Berdoy, M. (2002). The Design of Animal Experiments: Reducing the Use of Animals in Research Through Better Experimental Design, p. 39. London, UK: Royal Society of Medicine Press Limited.