Constructing identity: The post Keynesians and the capital controversies

Journal of the History of Economic Thought

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 241-259

  Mata, Tiago ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042516986     PISSN: 10538372     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1042771042000219055     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (70)

1. Ahmad, S. 1986. "A Pasinetti Theory of Relative Profit Share for the Anti-Pasinetti Case." Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 9 (Fall): 149-58.
2. Arena, R. 1987. "L'école internationale d'été de Trieste (1981-1985): vers une synthèse classico-keynésienne? " Économies et sociétés n 7 (Mars): 205-38.
3. Asimakopulos, A. 1969. "A Robinsonian Growth Model in One-sector Notation." Australian Economic Papers 8 (June): 41-58.
4. Baldone, S. 1984. "From Surrogate to Pseudo Production Functions." Cambridge Journal of Economics 8 (September): 271-89.
5. Bernstein, M. A. 1985. "The Methodological Resolution of the Cambridge Capital Controversies: A Comment." Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 7 (Summer): 607-11.
6. Blaug, M. 1974. The Cambridge Revolution, Success or Failure? A Critical Analysis of Cambridge Theories of Value and Distribution, London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
7. Birner, J. 1996. "Cambridge Histories True and False." In M. C. Marcuzzo, L. L. Pasinetti, and A. Roncaglia, eds., The Economics of Joan Robinson. London: Routledge.
8. Bruno, M., Burmeister, E. & Sheshinski, E. 1966. "Nature and Implications of the Reswitching of Techniques." Quarterly Journal of Economics 80 (November): 526-53.
9. Champernowne, D. G. 1953-54. "The Production Function and the Theory of Capital: Comment." Review of Economic Studies 21 (2): 112-35.
10. Cohen, A. J. 1984. "The Methodological Resolution of the Cambridge Controversies." Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 6 (Summer): 614-29.
11. Cohen, A. J. 1985. "Issues in the Cambridge Controversies." Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 7 (Summer): 612-15.
12. Cohen, A. J. & Harcourt, G. C. 2003. "Whatever Happened to the Cambridge Capital Controversies?" Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (Winter): 199-214.
13. Davidson, P. 1968. "The Demand and Supply of Securities and Economic Growth and its Implications for the Kaldor-Pasinetti Versus Samuelson-Modigliani Controversy." American Economic Review 58 (May): 252-69.
14. Davidson, P. 1972. Money and the Real World. London: Macmillan.
15. Davis, J. B. 1987. "Three Principles of Post Keynesian Methodology." Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 9 (Summer): 552-64.
16. Deane, P. 1989. "A Bibliographical Memoir." In Ingrid H. Rima, ed., The Joan Robinson Legacy. New York: ME Sharpe.
17. Dow, S. 1980. "Methodological Morality in the Cambridge Controversies." Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 2 (Spring): 368-80.
18. Dow, S. 1982. "Neoclassical Tautologies and the Cambridge Capital Controversies: Reply." Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 5 (Fall): 132-34.
19. Dow, S. 2002. "History of Economic Thought in the Post Keynesian Tradition." In E. Roy Weintraub, ed., The Future of the History of Economics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
20. Eichner, A. S. & Kregel, J. A. 1975. "An Essay on Post-Keynesian Theory: A New Paradigm in Economics." Journal of Economic Literature 13 (December): 1293-314.
21. Fazi, E. & Salvadori, N. 1985. "The Existence of a Two-class Economy in a General Cambridge Model of Growth and Distribution." Cambridge Journal of Economics 9 (June): 155-64.
22. Fleck, F. H. & Domenghino, C.-M. 1987. "Cambridge (U.K.) versus Cambridge (Mass.): A Keynesian Solution of 'Pasinetti's Paradox'." Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 10 (Fall): 22-36.
23. Garegnani, P. 1966. "Switching of Techniques." Quarterly Journal of Economics 80 (November): 555-67.
24. Halevi, J. 1985. "Switching and Employment." Eastern Economic Journal 11 (July-September): 229-34.
25. Harcourt, G. C. 1969. "Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital." Journal of Economic Literature 1 (June): 369-405.
26. Harcourt, G. C. 1972. Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital. London: Cambridge University Press.
27. Harcourt, G. C. 1975a. "Capital Theory: Much Ado About Something." Thames Papers in Political Economy (Autumn): 1-16.
28. Harcourt, G. C. 1975b. "The Cambridge Controversies: The Afterglow." In M. Parkin and A. R. Nobay, eds., Contemporary Issues in Economics. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
29. Harcourt, G. C. 1976. "The Cambridge Controversies: Old Ways and New Horizons-Or Dead End?" Oxford Economic Papers 28 (March): 25-65.
30. Harcourt, G. C. 1999. '"Horses for Courses': The Making of a Post-Keynesian Economist." In Arnold Heertje, ed., The Makers of Modern Economics Vol. 4. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
31. Harcourt, G. C. 2000. "Harcourt, Geoff Collin." In P. Arestis and M. Sawyer, eds., A Biographical Dictionary of Dissenting Economists. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
32. Harcourt, G. C. & Hamouda, O. F. 1988. "Post-Keynesianism: From Criticism to Coherence?" Bulletin of Economic Research 40 (January): 1-33.
33. Harris, D. J. 1973. "Capital, Distribution, and the Aggregate Production Function." American Economic Review 63 (March): 100-13.
34. Harris, D. J. 1978. Capital Accumulation and Income Distribution. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
35. Hicks, J. 1974. "Perspectives in Twentieth Century Economic Theory: Capital Controversies, Ancient and Modern." American Economic Review 64 (May): 307-16.
36. Hodgson, G. 1997. "The Fate of the Cambridge Capital Controversy." In P. Arestis and M. C. Sawyer, eds., Capital Controversy, Post Keynesian Economics and the History of Economics: Essays in Honour of Geoff Harcourt. London: Routledge.
37. Isserman, M. & Kazin, M. 2000. America Divided: The Civil War of the 1960s. New York: Oxford University Press.
38. King, J. E. 1994. Conversations with Post Keynesians. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
39. King, J. E. 2002. A History of Post Keynesian Economics Since 1936. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
40. Kregel, J. A. 1971. Rate of Profit, Distribution and Growth: Two Views. London: Macmillan.
41. Kregel, J. A. 1973. The Reconstruction of Political Economy: An Introduction to Post-Keynesian Economics. London: Macmillan.
42. Laibman, D. & Nell, E. J. 1977. "Reswitching, Wicksell Effects and the Neoclassical Production Function." American Economic Review 67 (December): 878-88.
43. Lee, F. S. 2000a. "Alfred S. Eichner, Joan Robinson and the Founding of Post Keynesian Economics." In W. J. Samuels, ed., Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 18c, pp. 9-40.
44. Lee, F. S. 2000b. "The Organizational History of Post Keynesian Economics in America, 1971-1995." Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 23 (Fall): 141-62.
45. Levhari, D. 1965. "A Non-substitution Theorem and Switching of Techniques." Quarterly Journal of Economics 79 (February): 98-105.
46. Mata, T. 2002. "How Important are Labels? The Label of Post Keynesian Economics." History of Economics Society Annual Meeting 2002 (July). Davis, CA. Unpublished.
47. Morishima, M. 1966. "Refutation of the Non-Switching Theorem." Quarterly Journal of Economics 80 (November): 520-25.
48. Nell, E. J. 1967a. "Theories of Growth and Theories of Value." Economic Development, Cultural Change 16 (October): 15-26.
49. Nell, E. J. 1967b. "Wicksell's Theory of Circulation." Journal of Political Economy 75 (August): 386-96.
50. Pasinetti, L. L. 1966. "Changes in the Rate of Profit and Switches of Techniques." Quarterly Journal of Economics 80 (November): 503-17.
51. Robinson, J. 1953-54. "The Production Function and the Theory of Capital." Review of Economic Studies 21 (2): 81-106.
52. Robinson, J. 1956. The Accumulation of Capital. London: Macmillan.
53. Robinson, J. 1971. "The Measure of Capital: The End of the Controversy." Economic Journal 81 (September): 597-602.
54. Robinson, J. 1975. "The Unimportance of Reswitching." Quarterly Journal of Economics 89 (February): 32-39.
55. Salanti, A. 1982. "Neoclassical Tautologies and the Cambridge Capital Controversies." Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 5 (Fall): 128-31.
56. Sale, K. 1974. Students for a Democratic Society. New York: Random House.
57. Samuelson, P. A. 1962. "Parable and Realism in Capital Theory: The Surrogate Production Function." Review of Economic Studies 39 (June): 193-206.
58. Samuelson, P. A. 1966. "Summing Up." Quarterly Journal of Economics 80 (November): 568-83.
59. Samuelson, P. A. 1975. "Steady-State and Transient Relations: A Reply on Reswitching." Quarterly Journal of Economics 89 (February): 40-47.
60. Samuelson, P. A. & Levhari, D. 1966. "The Non Switching Theorem is False." Quarterly Journal of Economics 80 (November): 518-19.
61. Students for a Democratic Society. 1962. The Port Huron Statement. Port Huron, MI: SDS.
62. Sraffa, P. 1960. The Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63. Solow, R. M. 1955-56. "The Production Function and the Theory of Capital." Review of Economic Studies 23 (2): 101-18.
64. Solow, R. M. 1963. Capital Theory and the Rate of Return. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.
65. Solow, R. M. 1975. "Brief Comments." Quarterly Journal of Economics 89 (February): 48-52.
66. Stiglitz, J. E. 1974. "The Cambridge-Cambridge Controversy in the Theory of Capital: A View from New Haven: A Review Article." Journal of Political Economy 82 (July-August): 893-903.
67. Swan, T. W. 1956. "Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation." Economic Record 32 (63): 334-61.
68. Turner, M. 1989. Joan Robinson and the Americans. London: M. E. Sharpe.
69. Watts, M. J. & Gaston, N. J. 1982-83. "The "Reswitching" of Consumption Bundles: A Parallel to the Capital Controversies?" Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 5 (Winter): 281-88.
70. Weintraub, E. R. 1991. Stabilizing Dynamics: Constructing Economic Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.