High cost of general practitioners with special interests is a fallacy [18]

British Medical Journal

Volumn 332, Issue 7532, 2006, Pages 54-

  Crowley, Cornelius J ^a  

^a Queens Walk Surgery   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FOLLOW UP; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HUMAN; LETTER; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN DISEASE; SKIN SURGERY; COST; DERMATOLOGY; ECONOMICS; NOTE;

COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; DERMATOLOGY; FAMILY PRACTICE; HUMANS; SKIN DISEASES;

EID: 30344485157     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.332.7532.54-a     Document Type: Letter

References (2)

1. Salisbury C, Noble A, Horrocks S, Crosby Z, Harrison V, Coast C, et al. Evaluation of a general practitioner with special interest service for dermatology: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2005;331:1441-6. (17 December.)
2. Coast J, Noble S, Noble A, Horrocks S, Asim O, Peters TJ, et al. Economic evaluation of a general practitioner with special interest led dermatology service in primary care [with commentary by M Roland]. BMJ 2005;331:1444-9. (17 December.)